Ranchers.net Bull Session

 

Log in Register Ranchers.net Ranchers.net's Bull Session Forum Index FAQ Memberlist Search


The longest-ever recorded kill by a sniper in combat
Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Ranchers.net's Bull Session Forum Index -> Everything Else
Author Message
RoperAB
Rancher
Rancher


Joined: 11 Feb 2006
Posts: 1435
Location: Alberta

PostPosted: Fri Aug 11, 2006 3:18 pm    Post subject: The longest-ever recorded kill by a sniper in combat Reply with quote

Lying low beside the rifle, his stomach touching the ground, Cpl. Rob Furlong concentrated hard on his breathing. In, out. In, out. In, out. Deep, but not too deep. Slow, but not too slow. The tiniest twitch -- a heavy exhale, perhaps, or a breath held one second too long -- could jerk his weapon ever so slightly, turning a sure hit into a narrow miss. In the sniping world, where one shot should always equal one kill, steady breathing is just as crucial as steady aim.
On that March afternoon in 2002, Cpl. Furlong squinted through the scope of his McMillan Tac-50, a sleek bolt-action rifle almost as long as he is. In his crosshairs were three men, each lugging weapons toward an al-Qaeda mortar nest high in the mountains of eastern Afghanistan. Master Cpl. Tim McMeekin, hunkered behind his fellow sniper, saw the same trio through the lens of his Vector, a binocular-like device that uses a laser to pinpoint targets thousands of metres away. Speaking quietly, both soldiers agreed on the obvious: take out the biggest threat first, in this case the man in the middle carrying the RPK machine gun. According to the Vector, he was exactly 2,430 m away -- nearly 2 1/2 kilometres.
A Newfoundland boy with pale blue eyes and a chiselled frame, Furlong adjusted the elevation knob on his scope, the barrel of his gun pointing higher and higher with each turn. He knew the routine, had practised it a thousand times back at the base in Edmonton. The farther away the target, the higher the rifle should point. Wind blowing to the left? Aim slightly right. Most snipers will tell you it's not much different than a golfer and his caddie lining up a long putt. Calculation. Instinct. And a little bit of luck. "You can teach a certain amount of it," Furlong says. "But there is a large percentage that you must have naturally. A good shooter is born. You can't teach someone to be a good shot if they don't naturally have it."
The 26-year-old stared through the scope, his left finger tickling the trigger. In, out. In, out. Behind him, McMeekin gazed through his Vector, reconfirming the precise distance one last time. "Stand by," Furlong said.
The first shot missed. A second round missed too, but not by much. It pierced the man's backpack. "They had no fear," Furlong recalls of his target. "They didn't run. I guess they've just been engaged so many times." He immediately reloaded the chamber and lined up his rifle for a third try, checking to make sure his grip was flawless. Furlong knew exactly why that second shot missed; instead of following a perfectly straight line, he had squeezed the trigger a tiny smidgen to one side. Even a fraction of a millimetre can make a huge difference on the other end -- in this case, the difference between a man's knapsack and his heart.
"Stand by," Furlong said again. Another loud pop echoed through the valley, sending a .50-calibre shell -- rocket-shaped, almost as long as a beer bottle -- slicing through the Afghan sky. Four seconds later, it tore into the man's torso, ripping apart his insides.
By that point, Rob Furlong, Tim McMeekin and three other Canadian sharpshooters -- Graham Ragsdale, Arron Perry and Dennis Eason -- had spent nearly a week in the rugged terrain of Afghanistan's Shahikot Valley, reaching out and touching the enemy from distances even they had never trained for. But that shot was something special. Rob Furlong had just killed another human being from 2,430 m, the rough equivalent of standing at Toronto's CN Tower and hitting a target near Bloor Street. It was -- and still is -- the longest-ever recorded kill by a sniper in combat, surpassing the mark of 2,250 m set by U.S. Marine Gunnery Sgt. Carlos Hathcock during the Vietnam War.
http://www.macleans.ca/topstories/canada/article.jsp?content=20060515_126689_126689


Back to top
Mike
Rancher
Rancher


Joined: 10 Feb 2005
Posts: 16951
Location: Montgomery, Al

PostPosted: Fri Aug 11, 2006 6:16 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Those 50 BMG's are amazing. That sniper was amazing too. I figure that the bullet drop at that distance was over 1500 inches. He had to have the right scope - and enough clicks to get the bullet that high.

Couldn't have been much of a wind blowing either.
That shot was approx 1.5 miles.

Here's some supposedly 50 Cal action on the Taliban:

http://www.sdcrew.com/gallery/displayimage.php?album=5&pos=2


Back to top
Ben H
Rancher
Rancher


Joined: 20 Mar 2006
Posts: 1737
Location: Gorham, ME

PostPosted: Fri Aug 11, 2006 8:05 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

such a beautifull weapon, here's me with an M-107 in our tower.


Back to top
Mike
Rancher
Rancher


Joined: 10 Feb 2005
Posts: 16951
Location: Montgomery, Al

PostPosted: Fri Aug 11, 2006 8:17 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hey Ben. Is that a night vision scope?

What's that picture above your weapon? It's purpose?


Back to top
Ben H
Rancher
Rancher


Joined: 20 Mar 2006
Posts: 1737
Location: Gorham, ME

PostPosted: Fri Aug 11, 2006 8:30 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

actually it's a day and night sight, has a lever on the side to switch between. I think it's a PVS-10. It's really not a good fit for the Barrett. It's calibrated for a 7.62/.308. We ended up getting another day scope on it and at night mounted a universal night sight in front of it. The Universal night sight can mount in front of any scope or sight, I was told it costs about $10,000.

The pictures is sort of range cards. A surveryor took pictures and got the distance and direction to all sorts of land marks. The panoramics, as we call them, have buildings numbered with an azimuth and distance in meters. Makes it quick when we call something in. Like when we see a bomb go off near a building we refrence it on the panoramic, call it in. Notice the white lines under the weapon with the 300, that is also the azimuth in degrees. You have to stand in the center of the tower for accuracy.


Back to top
Mike
Rancher
Rancher


Joined: 10 Feb 2005
Posts: 16951
Location: Montgomery, Al

PostPosted: Sat Aug 12, 2006 8:50 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Ben H wrote:
actually it's a day and night sight, has a lever on the side to switch between. I think it's a PVS-10. It's really not a good fit for the Barrett. It's calibrated for a 7.62/.308. We ended up getting another day scope on it and at night mounted a universal night sight in front of it. The Universal night sight can mount in front of any scope or sight, I was told it costs about $10,000.

The pictures is sort of range cards. A surveryor took pictures and got the distance and direction to all sorts of land marks. The panoramics, as we call them, have buildings numbered with an azimuth and distance in meters. Makes it quick when we call something in. Like when we see a bomb go off near a building we refrence it on the panoramic, call it in. Notice the white lines under the weapon with the 300, that is also the azimuth in degrees. You have to stand in the center of the tower for accuracy.


Gotcha! That's kinda like in my big deer shooting house. I've got PVC pipe with a different colored ribbon driven in the ground every hundred yards out, up to 1000 yds. surrounding the house so that I don't have to grab a rangefinder for every shot.

Great idea, taking a picture and calculating distance to each landmark! I might try that this year. I just learned something new.

Knowing distance is a must, but wind is my main problem. Any Tips? Wink


Back to top
Northern Rancher
Rancher
Rancher


Joined: 10 Feb 2005
Posts: 12251
Location: saskatchewan

PostPosted: Sat Aug 12, 2006 9:23 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Just curious how far do you consider it to be an ethical shot at a deer. If wind is affecting you that much you must be reaching out aways. I like to stretch things out on varmints but I tend to like to 'hunt' deer till i get pretty close. Some of those hunting shows on OLN you might as well go shoot a steer out of your halfton. Ben have you ever shot a .338 Lupua-I was at Dakota Arms in Sturgis, South Dakota one time and they showed me a custom built one-it was truly a work of art.


Back to top
RoperAB
Rancher
Rancher


Joined: 11 Feb 2006
Posts: 1435
Location: Alberta

PostPosted: Sat Aug 12, 2006 9:35 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Mike wrote:


Knowing distance is a must, but wind is my main problem. Any Tips? Wink


I used to do a lot of shooting. I dont really have the time or the interest anymore. Well im interested but I dont have the time.
Your elevation to sea level<mountains>, humidity, outside temp as well as the wind sure make a big difference at a 1/4 mile<440 yards> or more.
Due to economics my rig is an old Ruger M77 in 300WM toped with a 4.5 to 12 power Leapold Mark 3 with a harris bi-pod. I did the bedding and trigger job myself.
Anyway assumeing you have a rig thats accurate enough your just going to have to spend an awful amount of time in the field in different weather conditions doing a lot of shooting.
When I was right into it I was averageing about 2000 rounds of full powered 30/06 ammo a year. This doesnt count 22 ammo, pistol practice or underpowered cast bullets that I was useing in other rifles for off hand target shooting.
When you get out past even 300 yards it just takes a lot of feel and experience to be able to make accurate first shots.
Where I live its one of the windiest parts in North America. The wind is just something you have to get used to. Just takes lots of experience.
The last Elk I connected with was on a calm day. I simple walked the bullets to him<there was enough time to recover from recoil to see the bullets hit> My Kentucky windage was 8 feet over his back and five feet in front of his nose. Thats with a 130 grain barnes x bullet at 3500fps.
A heavy bullet with a high ballistic coeficient makes things a lot easier. Also the shorter the time of flight the better! I sure would love a 50 cal! Like a 30/06 180grain sure gets tossed around in the wind. At a thousand yards it will just barely go through 3/8" plywood! You can pick up your bullets on the other side of your backstop and they are not deformed at all except for the rifling grooves!
I tell you what makes excellent practice. Have one rifle and shoot it a lot under different weather conditions in different field positions at different ranges. Also gophers, prairie dogs and yodel dogs make excellent practice.
Also besides load development, dont waste time shooting from a bench.
About the article
You know thats quite the thing that Cpl. Rob Furlong did. Gosh it must give him a feeling of "being in charge" knowing that he could take out anybody within a mile and a half!


Back to top
RoperAB
Rancher
Rancher


Joined: 11 Feb 2006
Posts: 1435
Location: Alberta

PostPosted: Sat Aug 12, 2006 9:49 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Also RT. Col. Jeff Cooper has some really good books. One of them is called "To Ride,Shoot Straight and Speak the Truth".
I leant my Cooper books out and they never where returned Sad


Back to top
Red Robin
Rancher
Rancher


Joined: 23 Apr 2005
Posts: 4386
Location: 8 mi S.E. of Harrison, Ar.

PostPosted: Sat Aug 12, 2006 9:54 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I don't care how the bullet gets there as long as it does.


Back to top
Northern Rancher
Rancher
Rancher


Joined: 10 Feb 2005
Posts: 12251
Location: saskatchewan

PostPosted: Sat Aug 12, 2006 9:58 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Shooters not hunters-my two bucks last year were shot at 8 and 10 yards in the bush-still hunted. Long range markensmanship is an admirable skill but 'walking' bullets to a bull elk isn't my cup of tea. Too many long cold days spent tracking and finding bucks after those kind of deals for it to turn my crank. Like I said shoot gophers in the next county all you want but you owe it to the big game to get close enough to hit it with a kill shot the first time.


Back to top
RoperAB
Rancher
Rancher


Joined: 11 Feb 2006
Posts: 1435
Location: Alberta

PostPosted: Sat Aug 12, 2006 9:58 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Northern Rancher wrote:
Just curious how far do you consider it to be an ethical shot at a deer. If wind is affecting you that much you must be reaching out aways. I like to stretch things out on varmints but I tend to like to 'hunt' deer till i get pretty close. Some of those hunting shows on OLN you might as well go shoot a steer out of your halfton. Ben have you ever shot a .338 Lupua-I was at Dakota Arms in Sturgis, South Dakota one time and they showed me a custom built one-it was truly a work of art.


It depends on the shooter. Also shooting game is different than shooting paper.
When I was guiding I would try to size up my clients. Man they could talk the talk. They could go on about balistics and gun culture. Talk about their shooting skills, etc.
Then I would call in a bull moose broadside to them at 20 yards and they would miss!!!!!!
You need the mindset, you have to be able to get in the zone. The military teaches this pretty good Wink


Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Ranchers.net's Bull Session Forum Index -> Everything Else All times are GMT - 6 Hours
Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
Page 1 of 5

 




Powered by phpBB
Copyright © 2001-2011 Ranchers.net
All times are GMT - 6 Hours