Ranchers.net Bull Session

 

Log in Register Ranchers.net Ranchers.net's Bull Session Forum Index FAQ Memberlist Search


Hanta Yo- What you think of this?
Goto page Previous  1, 2
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Ranchers.net's Bull Session Forum Index -> Political Bull
Author Message
Oldtimer
Rancher
Rancher


Joined: 10 Feb 2005
Posts: 24734
Location: Northeast Montana

PostPosted: Sun Oct 12, 2008 3:15 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hanta Yo wrote:
Quote:
© 2008 Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.


Naughty, naughty, naughty OT. Looks like I have to follow you around to keep you honest Wink

I went there and read it. You needed to post the whole story, not just the first part. I was going to until I read the very bottom, of which I just posted.


First, Sarah is running for VP, not president. Why are you giving her so much power? Second, it looks like this is the only dirt they can dig up on Palin?

You wrote:

Quote:
If I remember right you were the one screaming the loudest about our Governors brother being in the Capitol Building too much- and working with the Governor...And being involved in state business...

So then is this now condoned by you


I was just finding more things to convince everyone that Schweitzer is evil. He has soooooo many secrets and he keeps his henchmen in line by bullying. The Billings Gazoo would never print anything about Schweitzer that wouldn't help him. So, someone has to be the carrier of the truth.

I don't condone relatives doing the job I should be doing - especially if taxpayers pay my wage. There, you happy OT?

Bullhauler wrote:

Quote:
But you see OT this is different because there are Republicans invloved and you know that Republicans are doing the Lord's work so anything is excusable.


I expect that kind of comment from you.


Hanta you need to look at the copyright laws and all the exceptions for using articles or portions of publications-- which include about 30 instances including for educational purposes , group discussions, book reviews, etc. etc. etc. as long as you give credit for where it originated- and then it is not considered plagerism or copyright violation...
If not- no school kid would even be able to take a current events clipping to school- or use a newspaper or book article for reference...


Back to top
Vision
Member
Member


Joined: 06 Oct 2008
Posts: 339
Location: Indiana

PostPosted: Sun Oct 12, 2008 8:17 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Oldtimer wrote:
Sandhusker wrote:
Oldtimer wrote:
Sandhusker wrote:
And what was Hillary doing when "we" were President?


Well we know what she wasn't doing with Bill- the reason he turned to Monica, and Gennifer, and the nose job gal and ?????-- but I'd gladly pay for all the cigars Bill needed, if we again had his National Debt and his economy in comparison to what we have today after 8 years of Bushenomics....


I'd kind of like to have Freddie and Fannie operating under the rules that McCain and other Republicans asked for a few years ago. Looks like they preticted what would happen pretty accurately, doesn't it? What was Obama's stand then?


The thing is- they are operating under those rules...The legislation was withdrawn when Fannie and Freddie consensually agreed to change from Title 33 reporting to Title 34 which is the same rules banks follow...
But you still have to have somebody looking at those reports- or all the reporting rules in the country are worthless...



They agreed but OFHEO has few teeth to enforce the agreement - hense a big problem.


Back to top
Vision
Member
Member


Joined: 06 Oct 2008
Posts: 339
Location: Indiana

PostPosted: Sun Oct 12, 2008 8:20 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Oldtimer wrote:
Mike wrote:
Oldtimer wrote:
Sandhusker wrote:
Oldtimer wrote:
Sandhusker wrote:
And what was Hillary doing when "we" were President?


Well we know what she wasn't doing with Bill- the reason he turned to Monica, and Gennifer, and the nose job gal and ?????-- but I'd gladly pay for all the cigars Bill needed, if we again had his National Debt and his economy in comparison to what we have today after 8 years of Bushenomics....


I'd kind of like to have Freddie and Fannie operating under the rules that McCain and other Republicans asked for a few years ago. Looks like they preticted what would happen pretty accurately, doesn't it? What was Obama's stand then?


The thing is- they are operating under those rules...The legislation was withdrawn when Fannie and Freddie consensually agreed to change from Title 33 reporting to Title 34 which is the same rules banks follow...
But you still have to have somebody looking at those reports- or all the reporting rules in the country are worthless...


Congress has the power of oversight. Barney said there was nothing wrong........ He even had an inside track with his "suck buddy"..... Rolling Eyes


What do we pay SEC regulators for? Why do we pay Banking regulators? They're supposed to do the oversight and report if their are problems....
Up to a little over a month ago I heard Cox, Paulson, Bush, and McSame all echoing to Congress and the public "The fundamentals of the economy are strong".....

You expect Congressmen to sit down and go over ever note that goes into Fannie or Freddie-- or thru Sandhusker Bank ? Say what? Rolling Eyes


The OFHEO warned Congress for years, they had hearing which I linked to in my articles.

OT those parts of the mortgage industry were exempt from SEC enforcement. The Treasury knew what was going on which is why they testified to Congress that it needed fixed, if they would have had the power to do it themselves they would have.

But guys seriously, OT never reads the evidence, he just goes on as if it doesnt exist... and to think that this man may own a gun.... frightening.


Back to top
Hanta Yo
Rancher
Rancher


Joined: 11 Feb 2005
Posts: 3641
Location: South Central Montana

PostPosted: Sun Oct 12, 2008 8:24 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Oldtimer wrote:
Hanta Yo wrote:
Quote:
© 2008 Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.


Naughty, naughty, naughty OT. Looks like I have to follow you around to keep you honest Wink

I went there and read it. You needed to post the whole story, not just the first part. I was going to until I read the very bottom, of which I just posted.


First, Sarah is running for VP, not president. Why are you giving her so much power? Second, it looks like this is the only dirt they can dig up on Palin?

You wrote:

Quote:
If I remember right you were the one screaming the loudest about our Governors brother being in the Capitol Building too much- and working with the Governor...And being involved in state business...

So then is this now condoned by you


I was just finding more things to convince everyone that Schweitzer is evil. He has soooooo many secrets and he keeps his henchmen in line by bullying. The Billings Gazoo would never print anything about Schweitzer that wouldn't help him. So, someone has to be the carrier of the truth.

I don't condone relatives doing the job I should be doing - especially if taxpayers pay my wage. There, you happy OT?

Bullhauler wrote:

Quote:
But you see OT this is different because there are Republicans invloved and you know that Republicans are doing the Lord's work so anything is excusable.


I expect that kind of comment from you.


Hanta you need to look at the copyright laws and all the exceptions for using articles or portions of publications-- which include about 30 instances including for educational purposes , group discussions, book reviews, etc. etc. etc. as long as you give credit for where it originated- and then it is not considered plagerism or copyright violation...
If not- no school kid would even be able to take a current events clipping to school- or use a newspaper or book article for reference...


I'm sure that the copyright laws aren't enforced....just couldn't resist giving you a little bit of crap... Razz


Back to top
hopalong
Rancher
Rancher


Joined: 12 Nov 2006
Posts: 5969
Location: Az.

PostPosted: Mon Oct 13, 2008 7:55 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hanta Yo wrote:
[

.just couldn't resist giving you a little bit of crap... Razz


Don't give him anymore crap!!!
He is already too full of it Very Happy Very Happy


Back to top
Hanta Yo
Rancher
Rancher


Joined: 11 Feb 2005
Posts: 3641
Location: South Central Montana

PostPosted: Mon Oct 13, 2008 8:14 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL Laugh


Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Ranchers.net's Bull Session Forum Index -> Political Bull All times are GMT - 6 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2
Page 2 of 2

 




Powered by phpBB
Copyright © 2001-2011 Ranchers.net
All times are GMT - 6 Hours