Ranchers.net Bull Session

 

Log in Register Ranchers.net Ranchers.net's Bull Session Forum Index FAQ Memberlist Search


McCain Concedes Colorado, Iowa, and New Mexico
Goto page Previous  1, 2
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Ranchers.net's Bull Session Forum Index -> Political Bull
Author Message
TexasBred
Rancher
Rancher


Joined: 03 Mar 2008
Posts: 2923
Location: Heart of Texas

PostPosted: Tue Oct 21, 2008 3:44 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

TSR wrote:
TexasBred wrote:
fff wrote:
TexasBred wrote:
fff wrote:
TexasBred wrote:
Oldtimer wrote:
kolanuraven wrote:
You gotta wonder why McCain bothers to waste fuel and spend more money...........just pack it in and go to one of the 13 homes.


He probably can't remember where they are Wink I just read an interesting article- McCain and his wife don't even live in the same house most of the time...She lives in the California beach mansion- and he lives in the Arizona desert mansion.... Shocked


Sounds like you and the old lady OT...here in the dog house and you in the $hit house.

But what the hell is wrong with owning more than one house if you can afford it? Kola brags about her Google Stock (which is a figment of her imagination), her air strip and her mansion. Nowhere does the law say we are restricted to one house.


You're right. There's nothing wrong with owning more than one house. Can you tell me why you think none of those houses are owned in their names: John and Cindy McCain?


Because it's not necessary. Plain and simple. One of my homes is in my name only. It was convenient.


Their homes aren't in either of their names. They're in trusts, business entities, etc. Why do you think they do that?


I betcha it saves them money. Very smart move. Seems John and Theresa Kerry did that with millions from Heinz recently to avoid taxes. Those things are in the tax laws to be used.


Seems like atleast for right now they are smarter at titling their homes than they are at politics doesn't it? Confused


Let's wait until after the election ok??


Back to top
fff
Rancher
Rancher


Joined: 04 Feb 2008
Posts: 1721

PostPosted: Tue Oct 21, 2008 3:48 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

TexasBred wrote:
fff wrote:
TexasBred wrote:
fff wrote:
TexasBred wrote:
Oldtimer wrote:
kolanuraven wrote:
You gotta wonder why McCain bothers to waste fuel and spend more money...........just pack it in and go to one of the 13 homes.


He probably can't remember where they are Wink I just read an interesting article- McCain and his wife don't even live in the same house most of the time...She lives in the California beach mansion- and he lives in the Arizona desert mansion.... Shocked


Sounds like you and the old lady OT...here in the dog house and you in the $hit house.

But what the hell is wrong with owning more than one house if you can afford it? Kola brags about her Google Stock (which is a figment of her imagination), her air strip and her mansion. Nowhere does the law say we are restricted to one house.


You're right. There's nothing wrong with owning more than one house. Can you tell me why you think none of those houses are owned in their names: John and Cindy McCain?


Because it's not necessary. Plain and simple. One of my homes is in my name only. It was convenient.


Their homes aren't in either of their names. They're in trusts, business entities, etc. Why do you think they do that?


I betcha it saves them money. Very smart move. Seems John and Theresa Kerry did that with millions from Heinz recently to avoid taxes. Those things are in the tax laws to be used.


Shocked Are you saying John and Cindy McCain, multi billionaires, don't pay the same taxes on their 8-10 homes as the rest of us? That they put those homes in trusts and names of their business TO AVOID TAXES? How can they do that? Could I start a trust and avoid or lower my tax bill? Or is only the rich who can do that?


Back to top
kolanuraven
Rancher
Rancher


Joined: 27 Jul 2005
Posts: 9981

PostPosted: Tue Oct 21, 2008 4:57 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

TexasBred wrote:
Oldtimer wrote:
kolanuraven wrote:
You gotta wonder why McCain bothers to waste fuel and spend more money...........just pack it in and go to one of the 13 homes.


He probably can't remember where they are Wink I just read an interesting article- McCain and his wife don't even live in the same house most of the time...She lives in the California beach mansion- and he lives in the Arizona desert mansion.... Shocked


Sounds like you and the old lady OT...here in the dog house and you in the $hit house.

But what the hell is wrong with owning more than one house if you can afford it? Kola brags about her Google Stock (which is a figment of her imagination), her air strip and her mansion. Nowhere does the law say we are restricted to one house.



I never said I had an airstrip nor a mansion.

I don't have to say a word as ya'll have created a wonderful fantasy world around me and about me ( excluding jigs of course). Laughing Laughing Laughing


I do know some things for certain and I'll share with you.

#1....you're an idiot

#2...I DO have Google stock

#3... I do have only ONE house.


Back to top
TSR
Rancher
Rancher


Joined: 27 Apr 2005
Posts: 1761

PostPosted: Wed Oct 22, 2008 7:04 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

TexasBred wrote:
TSR wrote:
TexasBred wrote:
fff wrote:
TexasBred wrote:
fff wrote:
TexasBred wrote:
Oldtimer wrote:
kolanuraven wrote:
You gotta wonder why McCain bothers to waste fuel and spend more money...........just pack it in and go to one of the 13 homes.


He probably can't remember where they are Wink I just read an interesting article- McCain and his wife don't even live in the same house most of the time...She lives in the California beach mansion- and he lives in the Arizona desert mansion.... Shocked


Sounds like you and the old lady OT...here in the dog house and you in the $hit house.

But what the hell is wrong with owning more than one house if you can afford it? Kola brags about her Google Stock (which is a figment of her imagination), her air strip and her mansion. Nowhere does the law say we are restricted to one house.


You're right. There's nothing wrong with owning more than one house. Can you tell me why you think none of those houses are owned in their names: John and Cindy McCain?


Because it's not necessary. Plain and simple. One of my homes is in my name only. It was convenient.


Their homes aren't in either of their names. They're in trusts, business entities, etc. Why do you think they do that?


I betcha it saves them money. Very smart move. Seems John and Theresa Kerry did that with millions from Heinz recently to avoid taxes. Those things are in the tax laws to be used.


Seems like atleast for right now they are smarter at titling their homes than they are at politics doesn't it? Confused


Let's wait until after the election ok??


Might want to give Aplus the same advice at this point.


Back to top
TexasBred
Rancher
Rancher


Joined: 03 Mar 2008
Posts: 2923
Location: Heart of Texas

PostPosted: Wed Oct 22, 2008 7:41 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

fff wrote:
TexasBred wrote:
fff wrote:
TexasBred wrote:
fff wrote:
TexasBred wrote:
Oldtimer wrote:
kolanuraven wrote:
You gotta wonder why McCain bothers to waste fuel and spend more money...........just pack it in and go to one of the 13 homes.


He probably can't remember where they are Wink I just read an interesting article- McCain and his wife don't even live in the same house most of the time...She lives in the California beach mansion- and he lives in the Arizona desert mansion.... Shocked


Sounds like you and the old lady OT...here in the dog house and you in the $hit house.

But what the hell is wrong with owning more than one house if you can afford it? Kola brags about her Google Stock (which is a figment of her imagination), her air strip and her mansion. Nowhere does the law say we are restricted to one house.


You're right. There's nothing wrong with owning more than one house. Can you tell me why you think none of those houses are owned in their names: John and Cindy McCain?


Because it's not necessary. Plain and simple. One of my homes is in my name only. It was convenient.


Their homes aren't in either of their names. They're in trusts, business entities, etc. Why do you think they do that?


I betcha it saves them money. Very smart move. Seems John and Theresa Kerry did that with millions from Heinz recently to avoid taxes. Those things are in the tax laws to be used.


Shocked Are you saying John and Cindy McCain, multi billionaires, don't pay the same taxes on their 8-10 homes as the rest of us? That they put those homes in trusts and names of their business TO AVOID TAXES? How can they do that? Could I start a trust and avoid or lower my tax bill? Or is only the rich who can do that?


fff...First off...they're multi-millionaires..not billionaires....and not to avoid taxes..All real estate is taxable. But there are other reasons as well. And yes if you were smart enough and had anything to put in a trust you might "save" some taxes....might even be rich someday, but wealth doesn't just fall out of the sky. (unless of course your name is Obama)
Why don't you google their tax return. I bet it shows you exactly how much they paid in real estate taxes.


Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Ranchers.net's Bull Session Forum Index -> Political Bull All times are GMT - 6 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2
Page 2 of 2

 




Powered by phpBB
Copyright © 2001-2011 Ranchers.net
All times are GMT - 6 Hours