Ranchers.net Bull Session

 

Log in Register Ranchers.net Ranchers.net's Bull Session Forum Index FAQ Memberlist Search


CCA to file in R-CALF suit

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Ranchers.net's Bull Session Forum Index -> Bull Session
Author Message
SASH
Member
Member


Joined: 10 Feb 2005
Posts: 567
Location: Southern Manitoba

PostPosted: Wed Feb 23, 2005 3:07 pm    Post subject: CCA to file in R-CALF suit Reply with quote

CCA Seeks Permission To Provide Info In R-Calf Suit




WINNIPEG, MB, Feb 23, 2005 (Resource News International via COMTEX) -- The Canadian Cattlemen's Association (CCA), on behalf of Canadian cattle producers, has filed for permission to provide information in the R-CALF vs. United States Department of Agriculture law suit, a release from the CCA said Wednesday.

Legal counsel representing CCA and Canadian cattle producers has filed an amicus curiae ("friend of the court") brief in the case being heard in the United States District Court in Billings, Montana, the release said.

Amicus briefs are legal documents filed by non-litigants in court cases which include additional information or arguments that those outside parties wish to have considered in that particular case.

The CCA brief focuses on the economics of re-opening the border to both live cattle and an expanded list of beef products, and argues that re-opening the border will not harm the U.S. beef industry, the release said. An amicus brief filed by the Government of Canada focuses on the scientific arguments for re-opening the border.

"The purpose of filing the amicus brief is to ensure that the judge hearing the case has all the relevant information needed to make an informed decision," said Dennis Laycraft, Executive Vice President of the CCA in the release. "The information being filed dispels the myth that there are vast numbers of cattle waiting to cross the border on March 7. It also points out that consumer confidence has remained high in both Canada and the U.S. and re-opening the border will not negatively impact that confidence."

The judge hearing the case will decide if the brief filed by CCA, and amicus briefs filed by other interested parties, will be accepted, the release said.


Back to top
SMS
Member
Member


Joined: 10 Feb 2005
Posts: 79
Location: Alberta

PostPosted: Wed Feb 23, 2005 4:14 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

ok boys, lets place the bets....2 to 1 the judge will not accept the briefs...after checking with Leo and Bullard.

I know i am being skeptic about the US legal system, but do you blame me, remember Rodney King and OJ. I wonder when this judge is up for re-election and who is donating to his election fund. I think me smells a rat...or is that a dead mad cow in Montana.... Shocked


Back to top
Oldtimer
Rancher
Rancher


Joined: 10 Feb 2005
Posts: 24734
Location: Northeast Montana

PostPosted: Wed Feb 23, 2005 4:17 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

SMS wrote:
I wonder when this judge is up for re-election and who is donating to his election fund.


The Judge is appointed for life- and it takes an impeachment act by Congress to remove him.......


Back to top
SMS
Member
Member


Joined: 10 Feb 2005
Posts: 79
Location: Alberta

PostPosted: Wed Feb 23, 2005 4:39 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

omg, does senile come to mind....lol j/k


Back to top
SMS
Member
Member


Joined: 10 Feb 2005
Posts: 79
Location: Alberta

PostPosted: Sun Mar 06, 2005 8:11 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I just had to bring this up, i quess i was right and the judge didnt allow the CCA to present its breif. Only listened to Leo and Bullard. Figures....


Back to top
Kato
Rancher
Rancher


Joined: 10 Feb 2005
Posts: 2560
Location: Manitoba - At the end of the road

PostPosted: Sun Mar 06, 2005 9:25 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Did anyone listen to the CTV National News last night?

Our American friends would not have heard this due to the fact that Canadian news is as scarce as hen's teeth south of the border.

According to them, Paul Martin and GW spoke on the phone last night, and GW assured him that he will veto any resolutions to keep the border closed.

He also told him .... there would be a panel of three judges appointed to hear the case. Shocked

I had all kinds of comments to add to this, but won't do it. Cool

I'll let you guys wade in on this one.


Back to top
rkaiser
Rancher
Rancher


Joined: 14 Feb 2005
Posts: 1953
Location: Ponoka Alberta

PostPosted: Sun Mar 06, 2005 10:20 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Very Happy I missed some of this one,,,,,,, who's briefs was the CCA pulling down and who's American ass was Laycraft trying to kiss this time? Rolling Eyes


Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Ranchers.net's Bull Session Forum Index -> Bull Session All times are GMT - 6 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 




Powered by phpBB
Copyright © 2001-2011 Ranchers.net
All times are GMT - 6 Hours