|
| Author |
Message |
PORKER Rancher

Joined: 02 Mar 2005 Posts: 4171 Location: Michigan-Florida
|
Posted: Sun Dec 13, 2009 8:43 pm Post subject: Wouldn't You know It ! |
|
|
Sunday, December 13, 2009
Climategate Revelations are but the Tip of a Giant Iceberg, says Atmospheric Scientist
Dr. William Gray, a renowned long range hurricane forecaster and Emeritus Professor of Atmospheric Science at Colorado State University wrote an op-ed for ClimateDepot.com.
Dr. William Gray. Image courtesy of the Colorado State University.
Gray states that the last century's global warming of about 1 degree F is not a consequence of human activities. This warming is primarily the result of a multi-century changes in the globe's deep ocean circulation.
The recent 'ClimateGate' revelations coming out of the UK University of East Anglia are but the tip of a giant iceberg of a well organized international climate warming conspiracy that has been gathering momentum for the last 25 years, according to Gray.
Other points that Gray makes.........
--There has been an unrelenting quarter century of one-sided indoctrination of the western world by the media and by various scientists and governments concerning a coming carbon dioxide (CO2) induced global warming disaster.
--Restricting CO_2 emissions from the present by as much as 20 percent by 2020 and 80 percent by 2050 (as being proposed in Copenhagen) would cause very large increases in our energy costs, a lowering of our standard of living, and do nothing of significance to improve our climate.
--The global climate models predicting large amounts of global warming for a doubling of CO2 are badly flawed.
Headline:::The website at the East Anglia University Climate Research Unit been taken down.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
PORKER Rancher

Joined: 02 Mar 2005 Posts: 4171 Location: Michigan-Florida
|
Posted: Wed Dec 16, 2009 4:41 pm Post subject: Duh! |
|
|
Climategate: Something’s Rotten in Denmark … and East Anglia, Asheville, and New York City
By meteorologist Joeseph D'Aleo
15 Dec 09 - "The smell in the air may be from the leftover caviar at the banquet tables, or perhaps from the exhaust of 140 private jets and 1200 limousines commissioned by the attendees when they discovered there was to be no global warming evident in Copenhagen.
Calgary beats cold record set in 1893 - 15 Dec 09
Record low temps in Saskatchewan (One goes back to 1885) - 13 Dec 09
Record low temps in Alberta (One goes back to 1904) - 13 Dec 09
http://www.iceagenow.com/Climategate-Something_is_Rotten_in_Denmark_and_East_Anglia_Asheville_and_New_York_City.htm
See Climategate: Something’s Rotten in Denmark … and East Anglia,
Asheville, and New York City
|
|
| Back to top |
|
per Rancher

Joined: 22 Dec 2007 Posts: 6090 Location: SW Alberta
|
|
| Back to top |
|
PORKER Rancher

Joined: 02 Mar 2005 Posts: 4171 Location: Michigan-Florida
|
|
| Back to top |
|
PORKER Rancher

Joined: 02 Mar 2005 Posts: 4171 Location: Michigan-Florida
|
|
| Back to top |
|
hypocritexposer Rancher

Joined: 12 Apr 2008 Posts: 16327 Location: real world
|
|
| Back to top |
|
PORKER Rancher

Joined: 02 Mar 2005 Posts: 4171 Location: Michigan-Florida
|
Posted: Fri Dec 25, 2009 3:49 pm Post subject: Ah , Nice and warm |
|
|
After 1337 miles , from Northern Michigan to Florida , I can thaw out! Our two trail horses love the warm Fl. air as the grass has a nice green tint. This wireless computer from ScoringAg has keep us out of the bad weather areas , while traveling South.
Just surfed the net and you should read this note to Al Gore.
This "Global Warming" fraud will prove to be the biggest jobs killer ever conceived; and, simply ship millions of America jobs overseas to countries such as China and India. The next time you hear the ranting of an Obamanite, ask them why there is "NO" statistical correlation between atmospheric CO2 levels and global temperatures (the latter which actually have slightly decreased over the last decade) -and- why the temperature trend lines on Mars tracks identically with that on earth. ((Hint: the Sun is the only common denominator.)) In brief: global temperature variations correlate precisely with Solar activity. As for the sustained hype over Ice Cap melting and sea level rise, Ice core drilling in the fast ice off Davis Station in East Antarctica shows that last year, the ice had a maximum thickness of 1.89m, its densest in 10 years. The average thickness of the ice at Davis since the 1950s is 1.67m. To emphasize the importance of these statistics, Antarctica contains 90% of the world's ice pack. Now you know why the inventor of the internet, Albert Gore, refuses to debate the issue. "If" the Global Warming enthusiasts were sincere in their intent to reduce manmade CO2 emissions, which constitute less than 0.00022 percent of the total naturally emitted from the earth s mantle, they would be actively promoting the significantly expanded use of Nuclear Power for America's electrical energy generation. An endeavor intended not only to rerduce CO2, which constitutes only about 0.037% of total atmosphere gases ; but, as well, to dramatically reduce our dependence on imported energy resources; and, to provide a distributed grid with dormant interconnectivity. The logic in this dilemma is exceedingly transparent, our Dictatorial Marxist, Barack Obama, simply wants more control over your activities ( Ranching and Farming) and lifestyle; and, the health of the American economy be dammed. It's essential that we clean house in the upcoming elections. Greg Neubeck
Check out this forecasting;
http://www.weatheraction.com/docs/WANews09No103.pdf
|
|
| Back to top |
|
PORKER Rancher

Joined: 02 Mar 2005 Posts: 4171 Location: Michigan-Florida
|
Posted: Fri Jan 01, 2010 7:03 pm Post subject: We Knew that! |
|
|
http://www.iceagenow.com/Burt_Rutan_calls_AGW_a_Fraud.htm
Burt Rutan calls Anthropogenic Global Warming (AGW) a Fraud and
26 Dec 09 - Dr. Gerhard Gerlich, a respected German physicist, counters the bogus theory of Anthropogenic Global Warming (AGW). He shows that the IPCC “consensus” atmospheric physics model tying CO2 to global warming is not only unverifiable, but actually violates basic laws of physics, i.e. the First and Second Law of Thermodynamics.
"Essentially, any machine which transfers heat from a low temperature reservoir to a high temperature reservoir without external work applied cannot exist. If it did it would be a “perpetual motion machine” – the realm of pure sci-fi.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
PORKER Rancher

Joined: 02 Mar 2005 Posts: 4171 Location: Michigan-Florida
|
|
| Back to top |
|
PORKER Rancher

Joined: 02 Mar 2005 Posts: 4171 Location: Michigan-Florida
|
|
| Back to top |
|
PORKER Rancher

Joined: 02 Mar 2005 Posts: 4171 Location: Michigan-Florida
|
Posted: Tue Jan 12, 2010 12:50 pm Post subject: Somebody is thinking |
|
|
Global warming theory called into question at Farm Bureau Convention
(Feedstuffs.com) – Much of current global warming theory is based on distortions of scientific evidence, blind devotion to simple notion and outright greed, according to a speaker at the American Farm Bureau's 91st annual meeting.
Christopher Horner, a fellow at the Competitive Enterprise Institute, contended that the theory suffers from problems with the measurement of the earth temperature and its interpretation. Comprehensive data collected since the Middle Ages reveal a natural process of fluctuation in average temperature. These data have been derived from studies of tree rings, ice cores and thermometer readings.
“The climate has always changed,” Horner said. “The question is, how does society respond to it—hysterically or rationally?”
Since the late 19th century the earth’s average temperature has increased by an average of one degree Fahrenheit.
“When it’s warm, there is more carbon dioxide in the atmosphere,” he said. Thus, the presence of higher concentrations of the gas, as detected in recent atmospheric samples, is not necessarily proof that the condition was created by human action.
Moreover, a careful assessment of late 20th century and early 21st Century temperature data contradicts global warming theory.
“There is no net warming,” Horner declared. “In fact, there has been a slight decline (in temperature) since 2001.”
The reliability of temperature data gathered during this period is, itself, subject to question according to Horner.
“Between 1985 and 2000 we had the hottest decade in history,” he pointed out. “But there was no measurement at Siberian temperature stations.” Much of the data collection was concentrated in urban locations in Europe and the United States. The resultant evidence shows an “urban heat island effect,” not a comprehensive portrait of the subject.
Late last year, the revelations of leaked e-mail correspondence from certain climate scientists posed the likelihood of a more sinister danger associated with global warming theory. The so-called “ClimateGate” episode, Horner claimed, showed that many scientists are more interested in garnering research dollars with little additional investigation than with engaging in independent investigations. The episode “warrants an immediate stay of further steps” in any public policy guided by the theory.
Horner lampooned the reliance members of Congress have placed upon such theory in proposing climate change legislation now under consideration.
“It is all pain, no gain,” he said. “It is all empty gesture. It is a rationing scheme under which the state decides how much of something you may use. It will raise the price of energy.”
He urged farmers and ranchers to examine critically the “offsets” offered by the legislation. These features of the legislation amount to an “accounting gimmick” that will not aid agricultural producers or most other members of U.S. society. “Your input costs and everybody else’s will rise,” Horner predicted. “The free lunch is not there and you will be next.”
Misguided congressional legislation should be abandoned, Horner said. “It is premised on demonstrably false results. It would accomplish wealth transfers and not affect the climate. It's about revenues, rents and ideologies.”
He cited the product of the recent climate change conference in Copenhagen, Denmark, as an example of the lack of effectiveness of such schemes. “It was a historic agreement to meet again next year,” Horner said.
Agricultural producers and other citizens of this country must confront the issue directly and insert rationality into the debate, Horner explained. He believes demand for reliable, comprehensive scientfic evidence is the first place to begin.
“We want a richer world to deal with something that is always going to happen, not a poorer world,” Horner concluded.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
PORKER Rancher

Joined: 02 Mar 2005 Posts: 4171 Location: Michigan-Florida
|
Posted: Thu Jan 21, 2010 10:57 am Post subject: About Time! |
|
|
IT'S OVER for NOW !!!!!
UN abandons climate change deadline
By Fiona Harvey in London and Anna Fifield in Washington
Published: January 20 2010 20:25 | Last updated: January 20 2010 20:25
The timetable to reach a global deal to tackle climate change lay in tatters on Wednesday after the United Nations waived the first deadline of the process laid out at last month’s fractious Copenhagen summit.
Nations agreed then to declare their emissions reduction targets by the end of this month. Developed countries would state their intended cuts by 2020: developing countries would outline how they would curb emissions growth.
EDITOR’S CHOICE
Scientists in glacier claim controversy - Jan-20In depth: Climate change - Jan-21Copenhagen’s true effect yet to be seen - Jan-17World weather shifts off balance - Jan-12Indian PM calls for fairness in climate fight - Jan-05Outlay on green tech set to grow - Jan-07But Yvo de Boer, the UN’s senior climate change official, admitted the deadline had in effect been shelved.
“By [the end of] January, countries will have the opportunity to . . . indicate if they want to be associated with the accord,” he said. “[Governments could] indicate by the deadline, or they can also indicate later.”
“You could describe it as a soft deadline,” Mr de Boer said. “There is nothing deadly about it. If [countries] fail to meet it, they can still associate with the Copenhagen accord after.”
UN carbon trading scheme
FT interactive graphic: Explore the technologies adopted and various developing nations’ level of participation
Countries pushing for a new legally binding treaty on climate change will be disappointed, as The waiving of the deadline sets a bad precedent for efforts to finalise a deal this year. The next scheduled meeting is not until late May, in Germany, with another in late November, in Mexico but many officials say more will be needed.
India, China, Brazil and South Africa, which meet this weekend, are likely to insist on deep cuts from developed nations but offer few concessions of their own.
The result of Tuesday’s Massachusetts senatorial election, which took away Barack Obama’s super-majority in the Senate, is likely to push climate change further down the US agenda. It was the latest in a series of setbacks that have caused efforts to push a cap-and-trade bill through the Senate to grind to a halt, making it harder for the White House to participate meaningfully in global climate negotiations.
Instead, the administration has been pressing ahead with steps to limit the US’s carbon emissions through regulation. The Environmental Protection Agency has unveiled new draft rules that would sharply tighten regulations on smog-building pollutants, or ground-level ozone, and has cracked down on greenhouse gas emissions by ruling that carbon dioxide and five other gases pose a danger to health.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|