Ranchers.net Bull Session

 
Log in Register Ranchers.net Ranchers.net's Bull Session Forum Index FAQ Memberlist Search


Palin rumor
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Ranchers.net's Bull Session Forum Index -> Political Bull
Author Message
hypocritexposer
Rancher
Rancher


Joined: 12 Apr 2008
Posts: 17414
Location: real world
PostPosted: Wed Jul 08, 2009 10:40 am    Post subject: Reply with quote
Quote:
hypocrite exposer isn't very good at his job because he seems to be missin some of these...


Nothing wrong with criticizing a president (past or present) But when you criticize past for certain policies or personal character, and then hold up the present for the same policies and character, that's hypocritical.

There is no opportunity to change the past, so complaining and criticizing won't change a thing. But putting pressure on the present administration or representatives might accomplish something.
Back to top
Tam
Rancher
Rancher


Joined: 10 Feb 2005
Posts: 8696
Location: Sask
PostPosted: Wed Jul 08, 2009 12:06 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
Mrs.Greg wrote:


You also have to remember,although I really DO like Palin,want her to move to Canada and give us a decent polititian,but she brought her kids into this when she decieded to run...sad but true. I'd NEVER put my kids in the medias way....NEVER!!!!!!!!!!!


Nonothing accused me of making excuses for Bush but is that not what you are doing for the Liberal bias media? Didn't Biden, Obama and Clinton also put their families into the medias way when they decided to run? Why is it OK to destroy the Republican Candidates families including Bush's but when Obama told the media families were off limits they backed right off the Democrat families and doubled down on Palin's? There are two sets of rules and you and and the rest of the liberals on here can not deny that fact after what happen in the last election and since. You are providing the Liberal bias media with an excuse by blaming Palin.

Considering she not one of the "rich" politicians and she is $500k in debt due to the ethics lawsuits and has been unable to do her job due to those crazy lawsuits and Alaska is out a couple million due to them, I think she did the right thing. Alaskan's deserve a governor that can do the job and not have to be spending their tax money on lawsuits that are filed by the left who are out to destroy her and her family. If the Left played by any thing considered fair play she could have remained in office but that was not on the lefts agenda. No matter what it cost her and the state of Alaska they were going to destroy her. Rolling Eyes

People that file crazy lawsuits that are tossed out of court should have to pay all legal fees of all parties involved resulting from that lawsuit. Maybe these crazies would stop and think before pulling this crap on the next person they want gone because they don't like them. Mad

BTW I would like you to point out what I posted about Obama in this thread that was not true. Like I told nonothing I was not making excuses for Bush unlike you are for the liberal bias media, I was just stating FACTS. Read the New York Times articles I linked to and watch the Youtube videos and tell us how the subprime mortgage mess wasn't started and supported by the Dems and how Bush didn't try to stop it. Even Bill Clinton was quoted saying the Dems stood in the way of regulations on Fanny and Freddy. I doubt you can claim he is a Bush supporter.
Back to top
kolanuraven
Rancher
Rancher


Joined: 27 Jul 2005
Posts: 9981
PostPosted: Wed Jul 08, 2009 12:19 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
Tam wrote:
Mrs.Greg wrote:


You also have to remember,although I really DO like Palin,want her to move to Canada and give us a decent polititian,but she brought her kids into this when she decieded to run...sad but true. I'd NEVER put my kids in the medias way....NEVER!!!!!!!!!!!


Nonothing accused me of making excuses for Bush but is that not what you are doing for the Liberal bias media? Didn't Biden, Obama and Clinton also put their families into the medias way when they decided to run? Why is it OK to destroy the Republican Candidates families including Bush's but when Obama told the media families were off limits they backed right off the Democrat families and doubled down on Palin's? There are two sets of rules and you and and the rest of the liberals on here can not deny that fact after what happen in the last election and since. You are providing the Liberal bias media with an excuse by blaming Palin.

Considering she not one of the "rich" politicians and she is $500k in debt due to the ethics lawsuits and has been unable to do her job due to those crazy lawsuits and Alaska is out a couple million due to them, I think she did the right thing. Alaskan's deserve a governor that can do the job and not have to be spending their tax money on lawsuits that are filed by the left who are out to destroy her and her family. If the Left played by any thing considered fair play she could have remained in office but that was not on the lefts agenda. No matter what it cost her and the state of Alaska they were going to destroy her. Rolling Eyes

People that file crazy lawsuits that are tossed out of court should have to pay all legal fees of all parties involved resulting from that lawsuit. Maybe these crazies would stop and think before pulling this crap on the next person they want gone because they don't like them. Mad

BTW I would like you to point out what I posted about Obama in this thread that was not true. Like I told nonothing I was not making excuses for Bush unlike you are for the liberal bias media, I was just stating FACTS. Read the New York Times articles I linked to and watch the Youtube videos and tell us how the subprime mortgage mess wasn't started and supported by the Dems and how Bush didn't try to stop it. Even Bill Clinton was quoted saying the Dems stood in the way of regulations on Fanny and Freddy. I doubt you can claim he is a Bush supporter.



Tam, the investigations will go on regardless that Palin quit.

So she has stopped nothing....she just won't be in a position to defend herself as good.
Back to top
backhoeboogie
Rancher
Rancher


Joined: 13 Mar 2007
Posts: 2828
Location: Texas
PostPosted: Wed Jul 08, 2009 12:53 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
Quote:


Tam, the investigations will go on regardless that Palin quit.

So she has stopped nothing....she just won't be in a position to defend herself as good.


I half expect her to go on to the offensive and get completely off of the defensive.

Proactive beats the heck out of reactive any day.
Back to top
Tam
Rancher
Rancher


Joined: 10 Feb 2005
Posts: 8696
Location: Sask
PostPosted: Wed Jul 08, 2009 5:19 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
backhoeboogie wrote:
Quote:


Tam, the investigations will go on regardless that Palin quit.

So she has stopped nothing....she just won't be in a position to defend herself as good.


I half expect her to go on to the offensive and get completely off of the defensive.

Proactive beats the heck out of reactive any day.


She is on the offense as her lawyer has already said that if anyone spreads rumors about her from now on will be facing charges themself. I can't blame her, it has got to be getting sickening seeing her name continuely smeared. Let some of these leftwing crazies pay a few legal fees defending themselves.
Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Ranchers.net's Bull Session Forum Index -> Political Bull All times are GMT - 6 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7
Page 7 of 7

 




Powered by phpBB
Copyright © 2001-2011 Ranchers.net
All times are GMT - 6 Hours