Ranchers.net Bull Session
Log in Register Ranchers.net Ranchers.net's Bull Session Forum Index FAQ Memberlist Search


COOL discounting Canadian cattle?
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Ranchers.net's Bull Session Forum Index -> Bull Session
Author Message
Shaft
Member
Member


Joined: 14 Feb 2008
Posts: 132
Location: The Big Smoke

PostPosted: Wed Feb 10, 2010 8:21 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Sandy, I gotta tell you it just makes my head hurt trying to rationalize two diametrically opposed concepts without having resort to the use of the word hypocrite. Ouch!

Quote:
Wide open borders; Packers for - R-CALF against.


Quote:
We're all in the same boat, and COOL partnered with an aggressive marketing campaign seems to me the best way to head off the flood of South American beef that the triumvirate of the NCBA/USDA/Packers are intent on bringing to our shores.


Back to top
burnt
Rancher
Rancher


Joined: 28 Feb 2008
Posts: 4250
Location: Mid-western Ontario

PostPosted: Wed Feb 10, 2010 12:51 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Sandhusker wrote:
Burnt, "But it is a most USEFUL tool in the packer's bag since all the legal battles undertaken by rcalf play directly into the packer's plans."

You've got to be kidding me.

Private BSE testing; Packers against - R-CALF for.
COOL; Packers against - R-CALF for.
Wide open borders; Packers for - R-CALF against.
PSA as written; Packers against - R-CALF for.
Increased competition on fats markets; Packers against - R-CALF for.
Full market disclosure on fat cattle sales; Packers against - R-CALF for.
NAIS; Packers for - R-CALF against.
Relaxing FMD import firewalls; Packers for - R-CALF against.


You seem to have gotten stalled on the first part of the above post - would you care to address the rest of it which deals w/ ot's claim that a label will defend the consumer from contaminated foods?? Say what?


Back to top
Sandhusker
Rancher
Rancher


Joined: 10 Feb 2005
Posts: 18081
Location: Nebraska

PostPosted: Wed Feb 10, 2010 1:46 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Shaft wrote:
Sandy, I gotta tell you it just makes my head hurt trying to rationalize two diametrically opposed concepts without having resort to the use of the word hypocrite. Ouch!

Quote:
Wide open borders; Packers for - R-CALF against.


Quote:
We're all in the same boat, and COOL partnered with an aggressive marketing campaign seems to me the best way to head off the flood of South American beef that the triumvirate of the NCBA/USDA/Packers are intent on bringing to our shores.


There is a contradiction in those statements?


Back to top
Sandhusker
Rancher
Rancher


Joined: 10 Feb 2005
Posts: 18081
Location: Nebraska

PostPosted: Wed Feb 10, 2010 1:49 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

burnt wrote:
Sandhusker wrote:
Burnt, "But it is a most USEFUL tool in the packer's bag since all the legal battles undertaken by rcalf play directly into the packer's plans."

You've got to be kidding me.

Private BSE testing; Packers against - R-CALF for.
COOL; Packers against - R-CALF for.
Wide open borders; Packers for - R-CALF against.
PSA as written; Packers against - R-CALF for.
Increased competition on fats markets; Packers against - R-CALF for.
Full market disclosure on fat cattle sales; Packers against - R-CALF for.
NAIS; Packers for - R-CALF against.
Relaxing FMD import firewalls; Packers for - R-CALF against.


You seem to have gotten stalled on the first part of the above post - would you care to address the rest of it which deals w/ ot's claim that a label will defend the consumer from contaminated foods?? Say what?


I don't see where OT made that claim.


Back to top
burnt
Rancher
Rancher


Joined: 28 Feb 2008
Posts: 4250
Location: Mid-western Ontario

PostPosted: Wed Feb 10, 2010 2:47 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Sandhusker wrote:
. . . I don't see . . .


You are starting to come around! See, it doesn't hurt as much as you thought it might, does it!! Laughing Laughing Laughing


Back to top
MoGal
Member
Member


Joined: 14 Dec 2005
Posts: 927
Location: SE MO

PostPosted: Thu Feb 11, 2010 3:26 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

COOL isn't discounting your cattle.......... you're still bombarding us with imported beef. In 2008, Canada exported 300,000 metric tonnes per year while you import back 97,000 metric tonnes............ beef imports are putting the American beef producer at a terrible disadvantage.



Quote:
But Canada remains the largest supplier of grain-fed beef to the U.S., exporting over 300,000 tonnes per year, BIC said Friday.


I presume that is metric tonnes as well..... here's the link:
http://www.meattradenewsdaily.co.uk/news/220110/canada___beef_exporters_must_adapt_to_new_rules_on_origin_.aspx

Yet, its okay to market beef as Canadian only here in the US?? and you all are complaining because Americans want USA only products?
--------------------------------------------------
here's the link for this full article: http://www.ers.usda.gov/news/bsecoverage.htm
Total U.S. beef consumption:
2002: 27.9 billion pounds
2003: 27.0 billion pounds
2004: 27.8 billion pounds
2005: 27.8 billion pounds
2006: 28.0 billion pounds
2007: 28.1 billion pounds
2008: 27.3 billion pounds

U.S. beef production (commercial carcass weight):
2002: 27.09 billion pounds
2003: 26.24 billion pounds
2004: 24.55 billion pounds
2005: 24.68 billion pounds
2006: 26.15 billion pounds
2007: 26.42 billion pounds
2008: 26.56 billion pounds

U.S. beef exports (commercial carcass weight and value):
2002: 2.447 billion pounds, $2.629 billion
2003: 2.518 billion pounds, $3.186 billion
2004: 460 million pounds, $631 million
2005: 697 million pounds, $1.031 billion
2006: 1.144 billion pounds, $1.616 billion
2007: 1.431 billion pounds, $2.175 billion
2008: 1.888 billion pounds, $2.978 billion



I think this summed it up well what is happening to the american beef producer (with a graph as well) however its from Mr. Thornsberry
http://www.agweb.com/beeftoday/Blogs/BlogPost.aspx?PID=2c9859cd-62e3-4137-9f04-a6667f121f16

There's a lot of nations (and their peoples) who have this "entitlement attitude"............ they're entitled to export everything they want to the USA and the American people are just supposed to shut up and take it. .................. this is one American who will not and I'm not the only one who feels that way about it............ If these congressional leaders don't start protecting the interests of their constituents and the sovereignty of this country, they will be voted out.


Back to top
burnt
Rancher
Rancher


Joined: 28 Feb 2008
Posts: 4250
Location: Mid-western Ontario

PostPosted: Thu Feb 11, 2010 4:26 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Uhhmmmm, MoGal, have you looked in the mirror lately? Confused


Back to top
Bill
Rancher
Rancher


Joined: 10 Feb 2005
Posts: 2067
Location: GWN

PostPosted: Thu Feb 11, 2010 3:06 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

MoGal wrote:
COOL isn't discounting your cattle.......... you're still bombarding us with imported beef. In 2008, Canada exported 300,000 metric tonnes per year while you import back 97,000 metric tonnes............ beef imports are putting the American beef producer at a terrible disadvantage.



Quote:
But Canada remains the largest supplier of grain-fed beef to the U.S., exporting over 300,000 tonnes per year, BIC said Friday.


I presume that is metric tonnes as well..... here's the link:
http://www.meattradenewsdaily.co.uk/news/220110/canada___beef_exporters_must_adapt_to_new_rules_on_origin_.aspx

Yet, its okay to market beef as Canadian only here in the US?? and you all are complaining because Americans want USA only products?
--------------------------------------------------
here's the link for this full article: http://www.ers.usda.gov/news/bsecoverage.htm
Total U.S. beef consumption:
2002: 27.9 billion pounds
2003: 27.0 billion pounds
2004: 27.8 billion pounds
2005: 27.8 billion pounds
2006: 28.0 billion pounds
2007: 28.1 billion pounds
2008: 27.3 billion pounds

U.S. beef production (commercial carcass weight):
2002: 27.09 billion pounds
2003: 26.24 billion pounds
2004: 24.55 billion pounds
2005: 24.68 billion pounds
2006: 26.15 billion pounds
2007: 26.42 billion pounds
2008: 26.56 billion pounds

U.S. beef exports (commercial carcass weight and value):
2002: 2.447 billion pounds, $2.629 billion
2003: 2.518 billion pounds, $3.186 billion
2004: 460 million pounds, $631 million
2005: 697 million pounds, $1.031 billion
2006: 1.144 billion pounds, $1.616 billion
2007: 1.431 billion pounds, $2.175 billion
2008: 1.888 billion pounds, $2.978 billion



I think this summed it up well what is happening to the american beef producer (with a graph as well) however its from Mr. Thornsberry
http://www.agweb.com/beeftoday/Blogs/BlogPost.aspx?PID=2c9859cd-62e3-4137-9f04-a6667f121f16

There's a lot of nations (and their peoples) who have this "entitlement attitude"............ they're entitled to export everything they want to the USA and the American people are just supposed to shut up and take it. .................. this is one American who will not and I'm not the only one who feels that way about it............ If these congressional leaders don't start protecting the interests of their constituents and the sovereignty of this country, they will be voted out.


Is buying US product the reason hundreds of millions beat a path to WalMart? Although some may say otherwise I think the majority of their constituents are already speaking with their wallets.


Back to top
burnt
Rancher
Rancher


Joined: 28 Feb 2008
Posts: 4250
Location: Mid-western Ontario

PostPosted: Thu Feb 11, 2010 4:21 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Bill wrote:
MoGal wrote:
COOL isn't discounting your cattle.......... you're still bombarding us with imported beef. In 2008, Canada exported 300,000 metric tonnes per year while you import back 97,000 metric tonnes............ beef imports are putting the American beef producer at a terrible disadvantage.



Quote:
But Canada remains the largest supplier of grain-fed beef to the U.S., exporting over 300,000 tonnes per year, BIC said Friday.


I presume that is metric tonnes as well..... here's the link:
http://www.meattradenewsdaily.co.uk/news/220110/canada___beef_exporters_must_adapt_to_new_rules_on_origin_.aspx

Yet, its okay to market beef as Canadian only here in the US?? and you all are complaining because Americans want USA only products?
--------------------------------------------------
here's the link for this full article: http://www.ers.usda.gov/news/bsecoverage.htm
Total U.S. beef consumption:
2002: 27.9 billion pounds
2003: 27.0 billion pounds
2004: 27.8 billion pounds
2005: 27.8 billion pounds
2006: 28.0 billion pounds
2007: 28.1 billion pounds
2008: 27.3 billion pounds

U.S. beef production (commercial carcass weight):
2002: 27.09 billion pounds
2003: 26.24 billion pounds
2004: 24.55 billion pounds
2005: 24.68 billion pounds
2006: 26.15 billion pounds
2007: 26.42 billion pounds
2008: 26.56 billion pounds

U.S. beef exports (commercial carcass weight and value):
2002: 2.447 billion pounds, $2.629 billion
2003: 2.518 billion pounds, $3.186 billion
2004: 460 million pounds, $631 million
2005: 697 million pounds, $1.031 billion
2006: 1.144 billion pounds, $1.616 billion
2007: 1.431 billion pounds, $2.175 billion
2008: 1.888 billion pounds, $2.978 billion



I think this summed it up well what is happening to the american beef producer (with a graph as well) however its from Mr. Thornsberry
http://www.agweb.com/beeftoday/Blogs/BlogPost.aspx?PID=2c9859cd-62e3-4137-9f04-a6667f121f16

There's a lot of nations (and their peoples) who have this "entitlement attitude"............ they're entitled to export everything they want to the USA and the American people are just supposed to shut up and take it. .................. this is one American who will not and I'm not the only one who feels that way about it............ If these congressional leaders don't start protecting the interests of their constituents and the sovereignty of this country, they will be voted out.


Is buying US product the reason hundreds of millions beat a path to WalMart? Although some may say otherwise I think the majority of their constituents are already speaking with their wallets.


Bingo. US shoppers reportedly spend almost 1 billion dollars per day at Walmart. Most of which goes directly to China. Which is directly contributing to the national debt . . .yet she says that Americans want to buy domestic!! Laughing


Back to top
Sandhusker
Rancher
Rancher


Joined: 10 Feb 2005
Posts: 18081
Location: Nebraska

PostPosted: Thu Feb 11, 2010 6:17 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Shopping at Walmart as opposed to Target, Alco, Gibson's ect... isn't a statement on the acceptance of foreign goods as the very same imported goods are in Walmart's competitor's as well. The reason one buys, say, a Chinese manufactured fishing reel or toaster at Walmart is because there are no American made ones at any other store. For the most part, we don't have the choice to buy the Chinese good at Walmart or the US good at Target - the only choice is where to buy the Chinese product because the US made product doesn't exist any more.


Back to top
Kato
Rancher
Rancher


Joined: 10 Feb 2005
Posts: 2519
Location: Manitoba - At the end of the road

PostPosted: Thu Feb 11, 2010 6:28 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

And why is that? Did American manufacturers let themselves go broke by not taking charge of their own industries like Canadian cattle producers are accused of?

Brother.............. Rolling Eyes Rolling Eyes Rolling Eyes Rolling Eyes


Back to top
Sandhusker
Rancher
Rancher


Joined: 10 Feb 2005
Posts: 18081
Location: Nebraska

PostPosted: Thu Feb 11, 2010 6:42 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Kato wrote:
And why is that? Did American manufacturers let themselves go broke by not taking charge of their own industries like Canadian cattle producers are accused of?

Brother.............. Rolling Eyes Rolling Eyes Rolling Eyes Rolling Eyes


No, the American manufacturers didn't go broke. They're the same companies just manufacturing in China instead of the US.


Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Ranchers.net's Bull Session Forum Index -> Bull Session All times are GMT - 6 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next
Page 5 of 6

 




Powered by phpBB
Copyright © 2001-2011 Ranchers.net
All times are GMT - 6 Hours