|
| Which one would you Buy |
| # 1 |
|
50% |
[ 8 ] |
| # 2 |
|
18% |
[ 3 ] |
| Neither one. |
|
31% |
[ 5 ] |
|
| Total Votes : 16 |
|
| Author |
Message |
Faster horses Rancher

Joined: 11 Feb 2005 Posts: 18920 Location: SE MT
|
|
| Back to top |
|
katrina Rancher

Joined: 14 Feb 2005 Posts: 7655 Location: East north east of Soapweed
|
|
| Back to top |
|
katrina Rancher

Joined: 14 Feb 2005 Posts: 7655 Location: East north east of Soapweed
|
|
| Back to top |
|
HAY MAKER Rancher

Joined: 13 Feb 2005 Posts: 8127 Location: Texas
|
Posted: Tue Feb 16, 2010 11:27 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Faster horses wrote: |
What's with 'you ladies' stuff? When did I complain about anything.
The front of those saddle is just the way Wades are made. I'm thinking
those are 7/8 double rigging and you can set them back a bit.
Some Wades are 3/4 double and I've even seen center fire rigging
on them. They are different looking, but the guys that ride them,
love them.
I'll say one thing, Haymaker. Those saddles can be hard to stay in.
You better get some bucking rolls. Mr. FH loves the Wades but he
has ridden other saddles so long, he just couldn't get comfy in
the Wades. He wanted to and he tried, and maybe it was because
he wasn't riding for a long time every day at that point in his life;
but he gave up on them. The guys that ride a long ways every day,
sure seem to favor the wades.
Good luck. |
I think buckin rolls ruins the looks of a Wade saddle,but I will say wade saddles and green horses dont mix to well.
besides who said you were complainin,is your name ladies
good luck
Last edited by HAY MAKER on Tue Feb 16, 2010 12:07 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
HAY MAKER Rancher

Joined: 13 Feb 2005 Posts: 8127 Location: Texas
|
|
| Back to top |
|
Mrs Leanin' H Member

Joined: 17 Jul 2009 Posts: 160 Location: Utah
|
|
| Back to top |
|
Oldtimer Rancher

Joined: 10 Feb 2005 Posts: 24333 Location: Northeast Montana
|
Posted: Tue Feb 16, 2010 1:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Yep Katrina that is the type of saddle I like-- some swells and cantle...The only thing I would change on that is the horn...Those tall "teamroping" dally horns have caused some bad injuries with several I know- especially broken pelvis's when the horse blew up and they ran them up their rear in the ensuing melee...
|
|
| Back to top |
|
MsSage Rancher

Joined: 27 Oct 2005 Posts: 4509 Location: NW Panhandle Texas
|
|
| Back to top |
|
Oldtimer Rancher

Joined: 10 Feb 2005 Posts: 24333 Location: Northeast Montana
|
Posted: Tue Feb 16, 2010 9:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| HAY MAKER wrote: |
| MsSage wrote: |
The only way you can choose is for you to sit in both of them.
You asked which I would buy...I said neither since I am a forward sitting rider and both of those saddles would be painful to ride any length of time in. You have to pick the saddle that fits YOU.
If your wanting to show saddles for a saddlemaker cool, does she make one for a forward sitting rider ....more in the lines of a hunt seat saddle? |
I dont think they make a size bigger than 16.
good luck |
Oh yeah they do...I know you can get association trees as big as 18"...
|
|
| Back to top |
|
Faster horses Rancher

Joined: 11 Feb 2005 Posts: 18920 Location: SE MT
|
Posted: Wed Feb 17, 2010 12:07 am Post subject: |
|
|
| YUP.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
cowhunter Member

Joined: 13 Jan 2010 Posts: 494 Location: williston florida
|
Posted: Wed Feb 17, 2010 2:40 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Both good lookin saddles. I just don't like the dee's built into the skirtin. Seen to many start to tear. I like them atached all the way under the seat so they can be fixed easyer. And I sure am spolt to a higher back u get with the asocation tree. Good lookin saddles though.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
HAY MAKER Rancher

Joined: 13 Feb 2005 Posts: 8127 Location: Texas
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|