Ranchers.net Bull Session

 

Log in Register Ranchers.net Ranchers.net's Bull Session Forum Index FAQ Memberlist Search


Maternal genetics
Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Ranchers.net's Bull Session Forum Index -> Ranch Talk
Author Message
leanin' H
Rancher
Rancher


Joined: 08 Nov 2007
Posts: 4373
Location: Western Utah Desert

PostPosted: Fri Mar 05, 2010 9:43 pm    Post subject: Maternal genetics Reply with quote

A question I'd like input about has to do with the corelation between maternal genetics and carcass genetics. Are they absolute opposites or do they fall somewhere in the middle? I have always followed the thinking that it takes great cows to make great calves. And a bull that throws great replacements would be more attractive to me than a carcass bull. And a secondary question is which Angus lines do ya'll like as maternal bases?

My plan for my cattle is based on balance. I won't chase fads or extremes and I want to build my bunch on "perfect" mother cows who calve unassisted, breed back and raise nice calves. I want a balanced set of cattle that are moderate to below average on frame size with good feet being real important too. So knowing what I'm shooting for, advise me what you'd pick as maternal bulls to breed with. Thanks for the input! Very Happy There are no wrong answers! Wink


Back to top
Grassfarmer
Rancher
Rancher


Joined: 21 Aug 2005
Posts: 1002
Location: Central Alberta, Canada

PostPosted: Fri Mar 05, 2010 11:13 pm    Post subject: Re: Maternal genetics Reply with quote

leanin' H wrote:
A question I'd like input about has to do with the corelation between maternal genetics and carcass genetics. Are they absolute opposites or do they fall somewhere in the middle? I have always followed the thinking that it takes great cows to make great calves. And a bull that throws great replacements would be more attractive to me than a carcass bull. And a secondary question is which Angus lines do ya'll like as maternal bases?

My plan for my cattle is based on balance. I won't chase fads or extremes and I want to build my bunch on "perfect" mother cows who calve unassisted, breed back and raise nice calves. I want a balanced set of cattle that are moderate to below average on frame size with good feet being real important too. So knowing what I'm shooting for, advise me what you'd pick as maternal bulls to breed with. Thanks for the input! Very Happy There are no wrong answers! Wink


Quite broad questions you are asking H and I guess it depends on definitions. Depends what you mean by "maternal genetics" - some equate it to milk production while others claim milk is not a maternal trait at all! I would say selection for "good" carcass genetics will be generally antagonistic to what I would describe as true maternal genetics, more so to milk production.
I'm not quite sure what your "great cows to breed great calves" saying means. I've bred what the feeder calf market considers great calves by mating pretty sorry looking crossbred cows to a Charolais bull.
You're setting your standards pretty low if you only want perfect mother cows Laughing Wanting these moderate to smaller frame cows, fertile, with perfect feet I'm guessing there will be a lot of popular bloodlines to avoid (maybe the majority in most breeds?)
I won't offer advice on Angus bulls but as I believe your herd is predominantly Angus and you aren't pedigree selling seedstock I would cross them with something like a Hereford. No point in straight breeding unless you are selling purebred breeding stock. Take advantage of the heterosis - your banker will approve Wink


Back to top
Soapweed
Rancher
Rancher


Joined: 11 Feb 2005
Posts: 12096
Location: northern Nebraska Sandhills

PostPosted: Fri Mar 05, 2010 11:25 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

If you are keeping replacement heifers from your own cows, pick from the best and sell the rest. If you plan on buying some young females, find a herd that someone has that is just what you would like to have on down the road, and then buy young females from that herd. Another option is to buy some older tried and true cows that have stood the test of time for someone else. Take pretty good care of them for a couple more years, and save those good heifer calves that those cows will produce. Work to get your ideal females, and the steer calves will sell themselves. Strive to maintain uniformity in your herd, unless you plan to butcher and sell the meat yourself--then it doesn't matter. Otherwise it does matter, and you will receive a bigger paycheck if you sell uniformity.

Free advice is worth exactly what you pay. Wink Smile


Back to top
gcreekrch
Rancher
Rancher


Joined: 21 Feb 2008
Posts: 8922
Location: west chilcotin bc

PostPosted: Sat Mar 06, 2010 12:10 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Soapweed wrote:
If you are keeping replacement heifers from your own cows, pick from the best and sell the rest. If you plan on buying some young females, find a herd that someone has that is just what you would like to have on down the road, and then buy young females from that herd. Another option is to buy some older tried and true cows that have stood the test of time for someone else. Take pretty good care of them for a couple more years, and save those good heifer calves that those cows will produce. Work to get your ideal females, and the steer calves will sell themselves. Strive to maintain uniformity in your herd, unless you plan to butcher and sell the meat yourself--then it doesn't matter. Otherwise it does matter, and you will receive a bigger paycheck if you sell uniformity.

Free advice is worth exactly what you pay. Wink Smile


Ditto.

The only point I would like to add is uniformity in colour will get your buyer's attention.
Uniformity in performance will keep them. Wink

I know Soap, I just like black AND red cattle. As long as they are the right type. Very Happy


Back to top
Northern Rancher
Rancher
Rancher


Joined: 10 Feb 2005
Posts: 12251
Location: saskatchewan

PostPosted: Sat Mar 06, 2010 1:41 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

The problem with best is we tend to correelate best with whatever pleases our eye not necessarily what is the most productive or profitable. Probably the best test is expose all your heifers and keedp the ones that breed first cycle-I got alot of ugly monjey making cowss doing that. i've always worked on breeding for mother cows-we ring the bell on the grid with those genetics and our replacements usually bring more than fat steers.


Back to top
PATB
Member
Member


Joined: 10 Apr 2009
Posts: 379
Location: Turner, Maine

PostPosted: Sat Mar 06, 2010 4:46 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

The cow better be able to survive in your management scheme and reproduce. I have not seen a study on carcass quality of maternal lines of cattle. I breed for a good funtional cows and not worry to much about carcass. The last time I talk with one of the feeders that buy my animals they were going 95% choice or better. They were averageing 85% choice on all cattle bought in maine and fed at their feedlot with no implants.


Back to top
Doug Thorson
Member
Member


Joined: 04 Mar 2007
Posts: 605
Location: western SD

PostPosted: Sat Mar 06, 2010 9:17 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I would say they work against each other.

Studies I have seen say any ribeye over 1.1 per hundred pounds of bodyweight leads to cattle that don't convert as well, ie hard doers.
The same with backfat, too little up here in the north, and your cows take a lot more hay to keep warm.
I haven't seen anything that correlates IMF either way.

My opinion is the easiest way to make money is to have better cows than most everyone else.


Back to top
Soapweed
Rancher
Rancher


Joined: 11 Feb 2005
Posts: 12096
Location: northern Nebraska Sandhills

PostPosted: Sat Mar 06, 2010 9:38 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Doug Thorson wrote:
I would say they work against each other.

Studies I have seen say any ribeye over 1.1 per hundred pounds of bodyweight leads to cattle that don't convert as well, ie hard doers.
The same with backfat, too little up here in the north, and your cows take a lot more hay to keep warm.
I haven't seen anything that correlates IMF either way.

My opinion is the easiest way to make money is to have better cows than most everyone else.


Please define "better." Wink


Back to top
Denny
Rancher
Rancher


Joined: 10 Feb 2005
Posts: 4411
Location: Mn usa

PostPosted: Sat Mar 06, 2010 11:44 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Soapweed wrote:
Doug Thorson wrote:
I would say they work against each other.

Studies I have seen say any ribeye over 1.1 per hundred pounds of bodyweight leads to cattle that don't convert as well, ie hard doers.
The same with backfat, too little up here in the north, and your cows take a lot more hay to keep warm.
I haven't seen anything that correlates IMF either way.

My opinion is the easiest way to make money is to have better cows than most everyone else.


Please define "better." Wink


Black Angus I'll bet Wink


Back to top
Justin
Rancher
Rancher


Joined: 02 Mar 2008
Posts: 4257
Location: NW South Dakota

PostPosted: Sat Mar 06, 2010 12:19 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Denny wrote:
Soapweed wrote:
Doug Thorson wrote:
I would say they work against each other.

Studies I have seen say any ribeye over 1.1 per hundred pounds of bodyweight leads to cattle that don't convert as well, ie hard doers.
The same with backfat, too little up here in the north, and your cows take a lot more hay to keep warm.
I haven't seen anything that correlates IMF either way.

My opinion is the easiest way to make money is to have better cows than most everyone else.


Please define "better." Wink


Black Angus I'll bet Wink


Laughing i'll bet ya Doug was thinking something different Wink


Back to top
leanin' H
Rancher
Rancher


Joined: 08 Nov 2007
Posts: 4373
Location: Western Utah Desert

PostPosted: Sat Mar 06, 2010 12:26 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Doug Thorson wrote:
I would say they work against each other.

Studies I have seen say any ribeye over 1.1 per hundred pounds of bodyweight leads to cattle that don't convert as well, ie hard doers.
The same with backfat, too little up here in the north, and your cows take a lot more hay to keep warm.
I haven't seen anything that correlates IMF either way.

My opinion is the easiest way to make money is to have better cows than most everyone else.


That's the plan! While my bunch is an Angus base I do like bulls with a smidgen of Maine too. And as soon as I can, I'm putting some straws of Ned Jrs great hereford bull in my tank. I'll stay mostly Angus but some bally faces will fit right in. Very Happy Thanks for the advice thus far!


Back to top
Dylan Biggs
Rancher
Rancher


Joined: 21 Apr 2008
Posts: 1480
Location: hanna,alberta

PostPosted: Sat Mar 06, 2010 6:28 pm    Post subject: Re: Maternal genetics Reply with quote

leanin' H wrote:
A question I'd like input about has to do with the corelation between maternal genetics and carcass genetics. Are they absolute opposites or do they fall somewhere in the middle? I have always followed the thinking that it takes great cows to make great calves. And a bull that throws great replacements would be more attractive to me than a carcass bull. And a secondary question is which Angus lines do ya'll like as maternal bases?

My plan for my cattle is based on balance. I won't chase fads or extremes and I want to build my bunch on "perfect" mother cows who calve unassisted, breed back and raise nice calves. I want a balanced set of cattle that are moderate to below average on frame size with good feet being real important too. So knowing what I'm shooting for, advise me what you'd pick as maternal bulls to breed with. Thanks for the input! Very Happy There are no wrong answers! Wink


There was a time when Angus were considered a maternal breed that also made good eating meat. Carcass cattle are more akin to limos or pieds or chars. Now because market forces have signaled we are trying to make carcass and maternal and growth and calving ease all in one. We want to have our cake and eat it to. It all gets a bit complex. A good old Angus didn't use to have to satisfy everyone. Soaps advise is as sound as any. Find a herd in your region that manages their cattle in the manner that suits you and study the cattle for soundness and go from there.


Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Ranchers.net's Bull Session Forum Index -> Ranch Talk All times are GMT - 6 Hours
Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Page 1 of 4

 




Powered by phpBB
Copyright © 2001-2011 Ranchers.net
All times are GMT - 6 Hours