Ranchers.net Bull Session
Log in Register Ranchers.net Ranchers.net's Bull Session Forum Index FAQ Memberlist Search


Bulls- High forage ration?????
Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Ranchers.net's Bull Session Forum Index -> Ranch Talk
Author Message
Just Ranchin
Member
Member


Joined: 11 May 2009
Posts: 87
Location: Saskatchewan

PostPosted: Tue Mar 09, 2010 8:31 pm    Post subject: Bulls- High forage ration????? Reply with quote

I am really starting to get frustrated with the amount of seedstock bull producers out there that claim to have a "high forage ration". We have built our business on this and now we have competing bull producers claiming the same "ranch raised" bulls even though they have seen hard feed since day 1. It seems like everybody says it even though you go to their yard and the bulls are on a finishing ration that is "a high roughage ration". It seems like it is what people "should" put in their catalogue, even though they are point blank lying. Also, how in the hell are some of these bulls weighing 1300+ on a "high roughage ration" when a feedlot is happy if he can have a 1350 lbs finished steer at 14 months? Amazingly, I feel better now.


Back to top
Justin
Rancher
Rancher


Joined: 02 Mar 2008
Posts: 4019
Location: NW South Dakota

PostPosted: Tue Mar 09, 2010 9:02 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

i think it's a requirement for bull producers to put "high roughage ration" somewhere in their catalogs. could be the most over used phrase in the cattle business.


Back to top
Larrry
Rancher
Rancher


Joined: 23 Jul 2007
Posts: 5118
Location: The good ole USA

PostPosted: Tue Mar 09, 2010 9:20 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

" a little bit of grain" explain a little bit

"no creep" no but the cows are fed like crazy or there is hole in the fence and the calves are slippin over to graze wheat.

How come so many brags about living in the best cow country but then they tell about how their cows do so well in tough country.

I've seen forage that cows get fat on or forage where they starve.

It's all relative


Back to top
Grassfarmer
Rancher
Rancher


Joined: 21 Aug 2005
Posts: 1002
Location: Central Alberta, Canada

PostPosted: Tue Mar 09, 2010 9:47 pm    Post subject: Re: Bulls- High forage ration????? Reply with quote

Just Ranchin wrote:
I am really starting to get frustrated with the amount of seedstock bull producers out there that claim to have a "high forage ration". We have built our business on this and now we have competing bull producers claiming the same "ranch raised" bulls even though they have seen hard feed since day 1. It seems like everybody says it even though you go to their yard and the bulls are on a finishing ration that is "a high roughage ration". It seems like it is what people "should" put in their catalogue, even though they are point blank lying. Also, how in the hell are some of these bulls weighing 1300+ on a "high roughage ration" when a feedlot is happy if he can have a 1350 lbs finished steer at 14 months? Amazingly, I feel better now.

I think it's a case of buyer beware Just Ranchin - are these yearlings that are weighing 1300+ on a high forage ration? Most of our rising two year olds will be under 1300lb just now because they are on a forage ration and it's winter - no creep, no pellets in their first winter, grass all summer and no pellets in their second winter. Some guys phone up wondering if our bulls will weigh 1800lb before they are two and I say no - some you win, some you lose. The way I see it a bulls potential is predetermined when he is born, feeding him hard or feeding him to his "genetic potential" can only shorten their life so why do it?....well I guess you could sell more bulls that way but is the continual search for new customers worth the effort.
I like my customers to take a bull away that gains weight and fattens as he works and goes on to last to a ripe old age. Forage reared bulls are more fertile and cover more cows too, even if they are smaller. The majority of bull buyers may say they want these traits but most are tempted by the BS and buy an overfed grain burner instead - oh well their loss.


Back to top
leanin' H
Rancher
Rancher


Joined: 08 Nov 2007
Posts: 4095
Location: Western Utah Desert

PostPosted: Tue Mar 09, 2010 10:18 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

To play devil's advocate or just the devil to some of ya.......Why feed bulls at all? If they cant survive without feed what good are they. Grassfarmer said a bull is predetermined when he is born and then says forage raised bulls are more fertile and cover more cows! But only if he is predetermined right! Wink If a bull has the right genetic makeup his cow could be a poor bagged non milking chain smoker and he will still do fine! Or we could all realize that any animal in good flesh is a sign of a healthy animal regardless of feed. I don't like over fat bulls and WONT buy one! They melt like my son's icecream on the 4th of July! But somebody sure must buy bulls like that cause the catalogs have lots of them. Buy what works for you, in your plan and in your climate.


Back to top
Dylan Biggs
Rancher
Rancher


Joined: 21 Apr 2008
Posts: 1444
Location: hanna,alberta

PostPosted: Tue Mar 09, 2010 10:23 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

High roughage ration without the exact ration formulation is meaningless. If the buyers don't care they won't ask. If buyers don't ask they won't know. The thing that those of us who raise our bulls without high energy rations have to do is communicate our exact feeding regime. The buyers that value the low energy slow grown approach will be interested. Here they are a small minority but growing none the less. Another way to look at the mainstreaming of at least the idea of high roughage is that there is obviously a growing acknowledgment of it's value. Though, like Just Ranchin, I find the lip service sire manure(BS) very hard to take.


Back to top
elwapo
Member
Member


Joined: 10 Feb 2005
Posts: 797
Location: medicine hat

PostPosted: Tue Mar 09, 2010 10:27 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

There is a fine line between feeding a bull to find out his genetic potential and over-feeding energy which causes undesirable effects such as burnt out livers and founder. Until the day comes that cattle are no longer finished in feedlots, performance testing bulls is the best indicator cattlemen have to gauge the finishing potential of a bulls offspring. Forage testing would be great if cattle were finished on grass like they did 100 years ago. But I am afraid that horse has left the barn. When I am looking to purchase a bull I shy away from both the guys that over feed and the guys that have under fed their bulls. There is nothing worse than walking into a pen of bulls and seeing a creep feeder full of grain at their disposal.


Back to top
Grassfarmer
Rancher
Rancher


Joined: 21 Aug 2005
Posts: 1002
Location: Central Alberta, Canada

PostPosted: Tue Mar 09, 2010 10:38 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

leanin' H wrote:
Grassfarmer said a bull is predetermined when he is born and then says forage raised bulls are more fertile and cover more cows! But only if he is predetermined right! Wink If a bull has the right genetic makeup his cow could be a poor bagged non milking chain smoker and he will still do fine!


OK, so I should have said a bull is genetically predetermined when he is born. More fertile and covering more cows I was attributing to rearing slowly on forage not the genetic component so much. If a bull has either a poor bagged non milking dam or daughter he obviously did not have the right genetic makeup.
As Dylan says the people seeking real bulls may be in the minority but their number is growing and that's good enough for me.

Elwapo, sure not everyone is fattening cattle on grass any longer but last I checked every cow in the country was expected to graze for her living. Perhaps performance testing terminal sire breeds (if we can work out which breeds they are Twisted Evil ) is appropriate but I believe that system to be absolutely wrong for selecting any bull you intend to keep replacement females off.


Back to top
AX-
Member
Member


Joined: 26 May 2006
Posts: 127
Location: Eastern Colorado

PostPosted: Tue Mar 09, 2010 10:46 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Our bulls maxed out at 8 lbs. of roasted grain (corn, soybeans, shredded beats, barley and cotton seed hulls). The rest is free choice low quality CRP grass hay. They have an average gain of 2.4 and adjusted YW of about 990 lbs. Back fat of about 0.2 inches. It is real interesting listening to buyers. Had a repeat customer look today saying how he really likes how my bulls are fed. About half agree with him and the other half say they could use some more weight. It seems that most will buy the fat bulls for more money, but at least I can feel good about what the bull should do for my customer. They usually look good in the fall and have good feet. We had very little problems with fertility doing it this way as well.

I know this - you can't hide the inferior bulls feeding this way and that is good. We used to take them to a bull test and gain 3.5-4 lbs./day and the bad ones looked pretty good at the end. It makes it a lot easier for me to cull the bottom and give the customers the good ones this way.

AXTELLCATTLECOMPANY.COM


Back to top
Grassfarmer
Rancher
Rancher


Joined: 21 Aug 2005
Posts: 1002
Location: Central Alberta, Canada

PostPosted: Tue Mar 09, 2010 11:05 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Here is a question for all the guys that like to buy/sell or use bulls that weigh 1100+ as yearlings or 1700lbs+ as two year olds - what weight are your females at the same age? I'm guessing they are lighter? Why is it acceptable for them but not the males of the species?


Back to top
Hereford76
Member
Member


Joined: 13 Dec 2005
Posts: 742
Location: North Central Montana

PostPosted: Tue Mar 09, 2010 11:34 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

AX- wrote:

I know this - you can't hide the inferior bulls feeding this way and that is good. We used to take them to a bull test and gain 3.5-4 lbs./day and the bad ones looked pretty good at the end. It makes it a lot easier for me to cull the bottom and give the customers the good ones this way.

AXTELLCATTLECOMPANY.COM


i think this deal started out with an issue about what the definition of a high roughage ration was and it is thrown around way too losly if you ask me.

everyone has their own idea of how it should be done and justifications for every one. but the quote above hits the nail on the head in my opinion. i've always felt it takes the bs out of the bs'er and gives a clear ubiased view.

on a side note (also mentioned in this thread) - seems like most of the seedstock operations are in the most unforgiving environments. cattle never see a hard day. i'm not much of a salesperson but my favorite sales pitch if you will is "their ain't no place for a cow to hide here"


Back to top
Just Ranchin
Member
Member


Joined: 11 May 2009
Posts: 87
Location: Saskatchewan

PostPosted: Wed Mar 10, 2010 6:51 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I talked to a breeder the other day and mentioned that his bulls were getting loose. Turns out they were getting 23 lbs of grain. I gasped, reached for my heart and started convulsing. I then open up his book, and wouldn't you know it "These bulls are fed with you the customer in mind, as they are not pushed developed slowly on a high roughage ration". I wanted to beat him with his own sales catalogue.


Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Ranchers.net's Bull Session Forum Index -> Ranch Talk All times are GMT - 6 Hours
Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8  Next
Page 1 of 8

 




Powered by phpBB
Copyright © 2001-2011 Ranchers.net
All times are GMT - 6 Hours