|
| Author |
Message |
Big Muddy rancher Rancher

Joined: 10 Feb 2005 Posts: 15240 Location: Big Muddy valley
|
Posted: Fri Mar 12, 2010 1:03 pm Post subject: Sheri vs Roy |
|
|
This a PDF with a article by Sheri and a rebuttal by Roy Rutledge. I don't know any other way so just open the PDF and read away. Both articles are near the top. This from Saskatchewan BEEF Business .
http://skstockgrowers.com/wp-content/PDFs/March%202010/36-47.pdf
|
|
| Back to top |
|
Big Muddy rancher Rancher

Joined: 10 Feb 2005 Posts: 15240 Location: Big Muddy valley
|
|
| Back to top |
|
per Rancher

Joined: 22 Dec 2007 Posts: 6090 Location: SW Alberta
|
Posted: Fri Mar 12, 2010 7:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Still processing. Tough to get past my Roy prejudice.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
Sandhusker Rancher

Joined: 10 Feb 2005 Posts: 18076 Location: Nebraska
|
Posted: Fri Mar 12, 2010 8:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
"The single case NFU slaughter experiment that Ms Monk describes does not constitute a serious economic analysis."
Who needs an economic analysis to see that there is a serious problem there?
|
|
| Back to top |
|
Oldtimer Rancher

Joined: 10 Feb 2005 Posts: 24330 Location: Northeast Montana
|
Posted: Fri Mar 12, 2010 8:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Ain't old Roy a Nillsons flunky now ? I thought thats what the Agriville folks had said...
|
|
| Back to top |
|
Big Muddy rancher Rancher

Joined: 10 Feb 2005 Posts: 15240 Location: Big Muddy valley
|
Posted: Fri Mar 12, 2010 9:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Oldtimer wrote: |
| Ain't old Roy a Nillsons flunky now ? I thought thats what the Agriville folks had said... |
Are you diverting? What about the article?
|
|
| Back to top |
|
Aaron Member

Joined: 10 Feb 2005 Posts: 519 Location: Stratton, Ontario, Canada
|
Posted: Fri Mar 12, 2010 9:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Some of Roy's points I don't agree with, but there are many that I do.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
Oldtimer Rancher

Joined: 10 Feb 2005 Posts: 24330 Location: Northeast Montana
|
|
| Back to top |
|
Big Muddy rancher Rancher

Joined: 10 Feb 2005 Posts: 15240 Location: Big Muddy valley
|
|
| Back to top |
|
PORKER Rancher

Joined: 02 Mar 2005 Posts: 4171 Location: Michigan-Florida
|
Posted: Fri Mar 12, 2010 10:14 pm Post subject: Nuff said and Nuff KNOWN ! |
|
|
But The FACTS are;
The NFU, with the help of an Albertan
rancher, butchered a cull cow which
would have fetched $340 at auction,
but yielded $1,233 worth of hamburger
and stewing meat at current retail
prices.
Every handler of beef thinks he needs to earn 100%+ of his investment ! This includes Retailers !
|
|
| Back to top |
|
Big Muddy rancher Rancher

Joined: 10 Feb 2005 Posts: 15240 Location: Big Muddy valley
|
Posted: Fri Mar 12, 2010 10:26 pm Post subject: Re: Nuff said and Nuff KNOWN ! |
|
|
[quote="PORKER"]But The FACTS are;
The NFU, with the help of an Albertan
rancher, butchered a cull cow which
would have fetched $340 at auction,
but yielded $1,233 worth of hamburger
and stewing meat at current retail
prices.
Every handler of beef thinks he needs to earn 100%+ of his investment ! This includes Retailers 
Joined: 22 Dec 2007 Posts: 6090 Location: SW Alberta
|
Posted: Fri Mar 12, 2010 11:23 pm Post subject: Re: Nuff said and Nuff KNOWN ! |
|
|
[quote="Big Muddy rancher"]
| PORKER wrote: |
But The FACTS are;
The NFU, with the help of an Albertan
rancher, butchered a cull cow which
would have fetched $340 at auction,
but yielded $1,233 worth of hamburger
and stewing meat at current retail
prices.
Every handler of beef thinks he needs to earn 100%+ of his investment ! This includes Retailers ![/quote
So is Mr Gracey wrong with his figures of Producer 43.82% the packer9.81% and the retailer at 46.47%? |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|