Ranchers.net Bull Session
Log in Register Ranchers.net Ranchers.net's Bull Session Forum Index FAQ Memberlist Search


First Ladies
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next
 
Post new topic   This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.    Ranchers.net's Bull Session Forum Index -> Political Bull
Author Message
Liveoak
Member
Member


Joined: 25 Aug 2009
Posts: 574
Location: Texas
PostPosted: Thu Sep 02, 2010 8:34 am    Post subject: Reply with quote
Steve wrote:
Angusgord wrote:
MsSage wrote:
This is as close to right behind me your going to get.....yeah you can still see I am as I have ALWAYS said FAT OLD and UGLY.




So now how about you...where is a pic of you?
Well Ms. Sage ,you have my respect posting your picture.Not old ,fat or ugly.

Hey I've posted my pictures on Ranchtalk a time or two ,look for a wrangler butt that may be mine ,the butts not as big as the belly Wink I'm working on that though


goes to show that attitude often matters alot more then size... Smile

I think attacking M on her shoe or ass size is unfair...

I think attacking her for a wrinkled out of step/style dress is unfair..

I feel attacking her is wrong.

but when she steps into the policy and political stage.. her words and actions are fair game...

so if you must be mean.. at least try to do it with a bit of humor..

Steve


I gather then that BC getting a BJ in the whitehouse was no big deal since policy is the only area that's fair game for the public?? Interesting!!
Back to top
Steve
Rancher
Rancher


Joined: 13 Feb 2005
Posts: 9072
Location: Wildwood New Jersey
PostPosted: Thu Sep 02, 2010 8:44 am    Post subject: Reply with quote
Steve wrote:
but when she steps into the policy and political stage.. her words and actions are fair game...

so if you must be mean.. at least try to do it with a bit of humor..

Steve
Liveoak wrote:


I gather then that BC getting a BJ in the whitehouse was no big deal since policy is the only area that's fair game for the public?? Interesting!!


I was talking about "first ladies"

but if you want to add,.. and their families.. I wouldn't object...




but a BJ would fall under Actions.. or conduct..

"elected" officials conduct.. or actions.. or the first ladies (and families) conduct or action.. if they are outrageous, then I would expect discussions.. and more then likely be involved in the discussions..
Back to top
loomixguy
Rancher
Rancher


Joined: 12 Feb 2007
Posts: 2118
Location: The Dark Side
PostPosted: Thu Sep 02, 2010 8:53 am    Post subject: Reply with quote
Steve, I respectfully submit to you that when M goes ANYWHERE on the taxpayers dime, she's fair game...be it Spain, Gettysburg, or anywhere else. Her husband is the President, therefore it's political in some form or fashion. Let's face it, she didn't go to Spain to solicit funds for the Red Cross, or to help the starving children in Africa.

Dad always said that folks can't help how they look, they can only help how they act, and from what I've seen, M's "act" is getting damned old.
Back to top
Tam
Rancher
Rancher


Joined: 10 Feb 2005
Posts: 8025
Location: Sask
PostPosted: Thu Sep 02, 2010 12:38 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
I feel the problem with Michelle's dress is if you look at the pictures of her during the election, on covers of magazines and on "Date Night" you know she has nice clothes. Where are those clothes when she is representing the US when meeting foreign Heads of States. She said once that, for once in her life she was proud of her country. Well to bad that pride doesn't show when she is representing the country in foreign countries. It is like she doesn't care about the image she puts forth when representing her country. Rolling Eyes
Back to top
Whitewing
Rancher
Rancher


Joined: 04 Sep 2009
Posts: 2403
Location: Venezuela
PostPosted: Thu Sep 02, 2010 12:51 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
Uh, I honestly wondered if that photo wasn't photoshopped. I actually hope it was. Confused
Back to top
Tam
Rancher
Rancher


Joined: 10 Feb 2005
Posts: 8025
Location: Sask
PostPosted: Thu Sep 02, 2010 1:22 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
Angusgord wrote:
Tam wrote:
I feel the problem with Michelle's dress is if you look at the pictures of her during the election, on covers of magazines and on "Date Night" you know she has nice clothes. Where are those clothes when she is representing the US when meeting foreign Heads of States. She said once that, for once in her life she was proud of her country. Well to bad that pride doesn't show when she is representing the country in foreign countries. It is like she doesn't care about the image she puts forth when representing her country. Rolling Eyes
Rolling Eyes Your just being miserable its NOT about clothes{Or her Butt} just like it isn't about clothes when Palin mouths stupidity


It is about presenting an image of respect for not only the US of which Michelle's (not Sarah's Rolling Eyes ) husband is the leader but the people she is meeting. I doubt anyone would consider her wringles cotton skirt a true image of respect. To me it is an image of someone that doesn't care what image she presents for a country that is flipping the tab for her expensive foreign vacation. It also looks as if she didn't care enough about the King and Queen of Spain to put on something nice as this is the outfit she wore to meet them. Rolling Eyes


Back to top
Tam
Rancher
Rancher


Joined: 10 Feb 2005
Posts: 8025
Location: Sask
PostPosted: Thu Sep 02, 2010 1:38 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
Angusgord wrote:
Tam wrote:
Angusgord wrote:
Tam wrote:
I feel the problem with Michelle's dress is if you look at the pictures of her during the election, on covers of magazines and on "Date Night" you know she has nice clothes. Where are those clothes when she is representing the US when meeting foreign Heads of States. She said once that, for once in her life she was proud of her country. Well to bad that pride doesn't show when she is representing the country in foreign countries. It is like she doesn't care about the image she puts forth when representing her country. Rolling Eyes
Rolling Eyes Your just being miserable its NOT about clothes{Or her Butt} just like it isn't about clothes when Palin mouths stupidity


It is about presenting an image of respect for not only the US of which Michelle's (not Sarah's Rolling Eyes ) husband is the leader but the people she is meeting. I doubt anyone would consider her wringles cotton skirt a true image of respect. To me it is an image of someone that doesn't care what image she presents for a country that is flipping the tab for her expensive foreign vacation. It also looks as if she didn't care enough about the King and Queen of Spain to put on something nice as this is the outfit she wore to meet them. Rolling Eyes
Then you'd bitch shes spending too much tax money on clothes! Wait a minute YOUR not paying those taxes so your just bitching! Very Happy



I would hope she is spending her own money on her clothes.

How do you know my family is not paying tax in the US? Confused
Back to top
commonsense
Member
Member


Joined: 06 Sep 2009
Posts: 142
Location: arm pit of the usa
PostPosted: Thu Sep 02, 2010 6:01 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
Some need to shake the dirt out their skirt over the wod of michelles panties. Geez, it is what it is. BIG!
Back to top
Sandhusker
Rancher
Rancher


Joined: 10 Feb 2005
Posts: 18081
Location: Nebraska
PostPosted: Thu Sep 02, 2010 6:57 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
Tam wrote:
If you want to know about my butt size just say Haymaker. As he once thought my butt was two axe handles wide and pictures were posted to prove him dead wrong. Wink


Yeah, but up in the Great White North, don't you use Paul Bunyan axes? Wink
Back to top
Larrry
Rancher
Rancher


Joined: 23 Jul 2007
Posts: 5118
Location: The good ole USA
PostPosted: Thu Sep 02, 2010 6:58 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
I think this lady would look a lot better






The only problem is she won't be first lady




but he husband could very well be first man






It is a little sad that her rear has gotten a little wider lately
Back to top
Big Muddy rancher
Rancher
Rancher


Joined: 10 Feb 2005
Posts: 15240
Location: Big Muddy valley
PostPosted: Thu Sep 02, 2010 7:16 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
[quote="Larrry"]I think this lady would look a lot better






The only problem is she won't be first lady




but he husband could very well be first man






It is a little sad that her rear has gotten a little wider lately












Your right Larry, That middle age spread has really hit her butt.

So sad Sad

At least she still has that GREAT smile. Very Happy
Back to top
Tam
Rancher
Rancher


Joined: 10 Feb 2005
Posts: 8025
Location: Sask
PostPosted: Thu Sep 02, 2010 8:12 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
Angusgord wrote:
Tam wrote:
Angusgord wrote:
Tam wrote:
Angusgord wrote:
Tam wrote:
I feel the problem with Michelle's dress is if you look at the pictures of her during the election, on covers of magazines and on "Date Night" you know she has nice clothes. Where are those clothes when she is representing the US when meeting foreign Heads of States. She said once that, for once in her life she was proud of her country. Well to bad that pride doesn't show when she is representing the country in foreign countries. It is like she doesn't care about the image she puts forth when representing her country. Rolling Eyes
Rolling Eyes Your just being miserable its NOT about clothes{Or her Butt} just like it isn't about clothes when Palin mouths stupidity


It is about presenting an image of respect for not only the US of which Michelle's (not Sarah's Rolling Eyes ) husband is the leader but the people she is meeting. I doubt anyone would consider her wringles cotton skirt a true image of respect. To me it is an image of someone that doesn't care what image she presents for a country that is flipping the tab for her expensive foreign vacation. It also looks as if she didn't care enough about the King and Queen of Spain to put on something nice as this is the outfit she wore to meet them. Rolling Eyes
Then you'd bitch shes spending too much tax money on clothes! Wait a minute YOUR not paying those taxes so your just bitching! Very Happy



I would hope she is spending her own money on her clothes.

How do you know my family is not paying tax in the US? Confused
Silly me ,I didn't realize you and Muddy Buddy pay taxes and voted in the U.S.

I hope she pays for her own clothes and is maybe frugal and shops in Walmart ,nothing wrong with that!!

I hope Palin paid her clothes allowance back to but I 'm thinking not


When does paying taxes have anything to do with the right to vote and I said my family? Wink

I read Michelle spent $500,000 shopping in Spain to get back at Barak for having his Birthday party with Oprah. I doubt she spent it at Walmart. Wink

And Sarah gave the clothes back to the RNC, so why should she have to pay anything back. They payed for them and got them back and everyone was cleared of any wrong doing as it wasn't tax payers money.

That is three striked Angus
Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.    Ranchers.net's Bull Session Forum Index -> Political Bull All times are GMT - 6 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next
Page 3 of 6

 




Powered by phpBB
Copyright © 2001-2011 Ranchers.net
All times are GMT - 6 Hours