|
| Author |
Message |
Sandhusker Rancher

Joined: 10 Feb 2005 Posts: 18244 Location: Nebraska
|
Posted: Sun Sep 04, 2011 9:12 am Post subject: Question for Jigs |
|
|
| Jiggsy, as it now obvious to everybody that the Bevo 12 is soon to be history and, judging by their comeback win over a junior college, K St. really doesn't belong in division 1 to begin with, when your conference disolves, will K St. drop down a division where they can be competitive or will they drop football altogether?
|
|
| Back to top |
|
Mike Rancher

Joined: 10 Feb 2005 Posts: 16951 Location: Montgomery, Al
|
Posted: Sun Sep 04, 2011 10:08 am Post subject: |
|
|
Isn't Eastern Kentucky in the same Division as UT Chattanooga? FCS?
Yes they are and they play each other on 9/17.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
Sandhusker Rancher

Joined: 10 Feb 2005 Posts: 18244 Location: Nebraska
|
Posted: Sun Sep 04, 2011 12:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I think the Mocs are in the same conf. as Auburn's homecoming opponent, Samford.
Were you one of those people who left the Auburn game early yesterday when Utah State had them whipped at home?
|
|
| Back to top |
|
jigs Rancher

Joined: 17 Mar 2005 Posts: 6938 Location: KANSAS
|
Posted: Sun Sep 04, 2011 1:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
not really sure what is going to happen in the big 12. all I know is not having NU in the conference is a joy. except the self proclaimed greatest fans still take every opportunity to pop off about how great they are and prove themselves to be the true suckers of D1 football.....
that being said, I question theactions of Beebee....Texas is not going to get into the pac 12...they will not allow the longhorn network. OU has it made in the big 12. obvious easy path to a national title shot.
I think it is all posturing to get the conference up to 12 teams. NU had an easier shot at a title in the big 12...but the lack of beating ou or texas....even a 5 win texas , proved to be too much, so they left.
seriously, a 4 super conference idea is stupid. the cash whores are KILLING what I consider to be one of the few things worth living for....NCAA football. I love my Cats. I loved them in the 70's and 80's when we were a breath away from dropping football. I loved them when they went to #1 in the polls, and loved them after the most gut wrenching loss in history ( aTm in 98 that took us out of a national title) so no matter what happens, where we go, I will be fine....you just sit there each saturday with your big red hat and your corn cob in your ass and don't worry about me.....
|
|
| Back to top |
|
Mike Rancher

Joined: 10 Feb 2005 Posts: 16951 Location: Montgomery, Al
|
|
| Back to top |
|
Sandhusker Rancher

Joined: 10 Feb 2005 Posts: 18244 Location: Nebraska
|
|
| Back to top |
|
Sandhusker Rancher

Joined: 10 Feb 2005 Posts: 18244 Location: Nebraska
|
Posted: Sun Sep 04, 2011 3:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| "Self proclaimed greatest fans", Jiggsy? You didn't read what I posted about what the Moc's head coach said? Here, for your education, " The fans were class all the way". I can post more examples from other coaches, too.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
Mike Rancher

Joined: 10 Feb 2005 Posts: 16951 Location: Montgomery, Al
|
|
| Back to top |
|
Sandhusker Rancher

Joined: 10 Feb 2005 Posts: 18244 Location: Nebraska
|
Posted: Sun Sep 04, 2011 4:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Generally, unless you're playing Texas and the BCS has plans. Then, the tally isn't changed, just the end of the game.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
eatbeef Member

Joined: 10 Jul 2011 Posts: 103 Location: Kansas
|
Posted: Sun Sep 04, 2011 10:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Sure will be fun to watch and see what unfolds with the big 12. Everybody says nebraska had to leave because we couldnt win against texas and that we are just whiners. Blah blah. When will the reality set in? Sure is nice to be sitting back not worrying about who is leaving next, where will we end up. In kstates situation, What conference would want us???? Nobody knows, guess it ought to be an interesting topic for awhile. You know somethings up though, when a billionare, T. Boone Pickens, comes out and says he dont think the big 12 is going to last, and that we need to look at our options, but at the end of his interview he did say we dont need to make a decision this weekend. So when will the reality set in and everyone realize that Nebraska left for greener grass and to get out the mess. Hell even the damn buffalo were smart enough to find better grazing!
|
|
| Back to top |
|
loomixguy Rancher

Joined: 12 Feb 2007 Posts: 2280 Location: The Dark Side
|
|
| Back to top |
|
okfarmer Member

Joined: 13 Oct 2010 Posts: 493 Location: Oklahoma
|
Posted: Tue Sep 06, 2011 12:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
If you look past the smoke and mirrors, there is actually less money in the super conferences. I'm not a Mark Cuban fan, but I imagine the guy knows a lot more about the finance side of things than most of the opinionated monkeys that write about this. And he is saying that they will actually loose money.
I think some of this stuff may be a way of putting Texas and ESPN in check with their ways of side stepping agreements made by the Big 12. As you know last year every one was gone until the last minute agreement.
Logistically, I understand that recruiting will assisted by coverage in new markets. But I don't understand why any school wants to travel 1,000 miles to compete. It is not just football and basketball- but track, soccer, softball, baseball, underwater basket weaving, etc..
Mark Cuban: Big 12 could be better off without Texas A&M
| Quote: |
If and when Texas A&M officially bolts for the SEC , many expect it to spell the end for the Big 12. The conference would have lost a quarter of its members in an 18-month span, and the Aggies' departure could spur top dogs Texas and Oklahoma to join the Pac-12, creating the first super conference in college football.
But Mavericks owner Mark Cuban wrote a blog post Sunday that encouraged the Horns and Sooners to avoid the temptation to go west, saying that a nine-team Big 12 conference would not only survive -- it could thrive. The biggest reason?
Money.
"The big college TV networks -- Fox, ESPN, CBS -- pay for quality, not quantity," Cuban wrote. "They need marquee match-ups that are 'Must Tweet TV.' The number of schools in a conference actually reduce the parity and quality of match-ups in a conference. The networks will not pay up for that."
Cuban also dismissed the notion that the Big 12 would hemorrhage cash if it doesn't find a replacement for A&M. He pointed to the conference's TV contract with ABC/ESPN, which will expire after the 2015-16 season, saying that Big 12 schools could actually see an increase in revenue when the conference negotiates a new deal.
"They will get just as much money and if they play their cards right, they could get even more," he wrote. "On a per-school basis, it could be much, much more."
Cuban said the creation of several super conferences would amount to a "huge mistake" by diluting regional rivalries, lowering conference revenue and forcing certain games into odd time slots or off TV entirely.
Whether members of the Big 12 will heed his advice is unclear, but one thing is certain: When it comes to making money, few know more than Mark Cuban.
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|