Ranchers.net Bull Session

 

Log in Register Ranchers.net Ranchers.net's Bull Session Forum Index FAQ Memberlist Search


Who is responsible for the border staying closed?
Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Ranchers.net's Bull Session Forum Index -> Bull Session
Author Message
southdevon
Member
Member


Joined: 12 Mar 2005
Posts: 20
Location: Reed Point, Montana

PostPosted: Sat Mar 12, 2005 3:18 pm    Post subject: Who is responsible for the border staying closed? Reply with quote

I guess what i just want to know is what everyone thinks about this issue, what they think we should do to improve our status, and any other input. I am writing a paper with your input and suggestions, names WILL NOT BE MENTIONED, unless you request it.

Thankyou,
Sam Fraser


Back to top
Murgen
Rancher
Rancher


Joined: 12 Feb 2005
Posts: 2117
Location: Ontario

PostPosted: Sat Mar 12, 2005 3:20 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Sam, are you talking about North american borders or export markets?


Back to top
southdevon
Member
Member


Joined: 12 Mar 2005
Posts: 20
Location: Reed Point, Montana

PostPosted: Sat Mar 12, 2005 3:21 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

both


Back to top
Big Muddy rancher
Rancher
Rancher


Joined: 10 Feb 2005
Posts: 15725
Location: Big Muddy valley

PostPosted: Sat Mar 12, 2005 3:26 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

March 7th was the date USDA slated the border would open to Canadian beef and R-CALF went to court and got the Injunction. I would say R-CALF is keeping the border closed. They at times even like to take credit for closing it in the first place but that was because of outdated BSE trade rules.
As far as International markets some are using the BSE as a trade deterant and other countries are starting to open up as the under stand Bse better.


Back to top
southdevon
Member
Member


Joined: 12 Mar 2005
Posts: 20
Location: Reed Point, Montana

PostPosted: Sat Mar 12, 2005 3:28 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Great, you guys post fast, i need opinions, blow off some steam if you want to, i need all angles. Personally, i am a member of R-CALF, and the MCA, and i need this input to have a non-bias view on this subject and learn more from a different perspective.


Back to top
Murgen
Rancher
Rancher


Joined: 12 Feb 2005
Posts: 2117
Location: Ontario

PostPosted: Sat Mar 12, 2005 3:34 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Sam, an R-calf member who wants a different opinion? That's different, haven't seen that before on Ranchers! But don't be offended if your desire for input is met with a little sceptitism!


Back to top
SMS
Member
Member


Joined: 10 Feb 2005
Posts: 79
Location: Alberta

PostPosted: Sat Mar 12, 2005 4:03 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

who is to blame? We all are.

The cattlemen in north america for not putting more pressure on our goverments to update BSE regulation's in both countries.

The goverments for dragging their feet on maintaining up todate regs, and for not allowing BSE testing on all OTM cattle years ago. Or at least the 4D cattle.

The packers for being lazy and not expanding beef markets and relying on the north americian market to be the backbone of the industry. Also the packing industry for almagamating to a few large plants, which meant there was a need for live cattle to be exported from cattle. Only boxed beef should be leaving either country.

The feedlots for not following M&BM regulations, cause of greed.

The public for believing the lies that political lobby groups throw around for the betterment of their own greed.

So you can see there is lots of blame for everyone. No one is completly innocent on this issue. If you want to bring it down to one common thread of blame, I think it is cause of "Short term profits and Greed, while sacrificing the long term viability of the industry".

Hope this helps you.

With a name like SouthDevon, you can be all bad even if you are an RCALFER..... Laughing

R. McGregor
http://www.compusmart.ab.ca/mcgregor


Back to top
Clarence
Member
Member


Joined: 10 Feb 2005
Posts: 225
Location: South Central Sd

PostPosted: Sat Mar 12, 2005 4:17 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Sam,

R-calf has done some things to keep the border closed, but I think they are trying to take more credit them they are entitled. I really don't think that by themselves they have that much clout.

I think the main thing is that there are so many unknowns. How did it get into North America? It seems no one wants to find the real source. We never had a case of BSE until rcently, so the source is from outside. The feed ban and ban on imports of ruminant byproducts have been in place for some time. All the testing of the 4ds and those entering slaughter plants may tell how prevalant the disease is but does nothing to find the source. I don't buy the spontaneous theory because non has been found in Mexico, Auturalia, New Zealand or Brazil.


Back to top
Bill
Rancher
Rancher


Joined: 10 Feb 2005
Posts: 2067
Location: GWN

PostPosted: Sat Mar 12, 2005 4:28 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Clarence wrote:
Sam,

R-calf has done some things to keep the border closed, but I think they are trying to take more credit them they are entitled. I really don't think that by themselves they have that much clout.

I think the main thing is that there are so many unknowns. How did it get into North America? It seems no one wants to find the real source. We never had a case of BSE until rcently, so the source is from outside. The feed ban and ban on imports of ruminant byproducts have been in place for some time. All the testing of the 4ds and those entering slaughter plants may tell how prevalant the disease is but does nothing to find the source. I don't buy the spontaneous theory because non has been found in Mexico, Auturalia, New Zealand or Brazil.


I would suggest that it is in ALL countries it has either not been "found" or simply not reported.


Back to top
Mike
Rancher
Rancher


Joined: 10 Feb 2005
Posts: 16951
Location: Montgomery, Al

PostPosted: Sat Mar 12, 2005 4:46 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Clarence, "I think the main thing is that there are so many unknowns. How did it get into North America? It seems no one wants to find the real source. We never had a case of BSE until rcently, so the source is from outside."
--------------------------------------------------------------------
In 1993 BSE was detected in a cow imported from England to Canada in (I believe) in 1987, at the beginning of the epidemic in England. Could this be where it started here in North America?


Back to top
Murgen
Rancher
Rancher


Joined: 12 Feb 2005
Posts: 2117
Location: Ontario

PostPosted: Sat Mar 12, 2005 4:49 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
I don't buy the spontaneous theory because non has been found in Mexico, Auturalia, New Zealand or Brazil.



But it's been found to be spnotaneous in Humans. 350 cases/year in the US. Things that make you go Hmmmmm!


Back to top
rkaiser
Rancher
Rancher


Joined: 14 Feb 2005
Posts: 1953
Location: Ponoka Alberta

PostPosted: Sat Mar 12, 2005 5:05 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Smile Mike from Alabama - The imported cow that came to Canada from the UK in the 80's is what the whole debacle is based on. It has been a very good story, and everyone is eating it up, but let's get real. BSE is everywhere in the world. Testing finds it. How many cattle were tested for BSE in the 60's or 70's ------ none. The whole epidemic infectious paranoia theory has been very useful for those who choose to take advantage of it, but cannon fodder ranchers have felt the brunt all over the world. And as much as some American ranchers feel they are immuned to problems from BSE, the day will come. No rancher is immune, not in Mexico, Brazil, the USA, or anywhere in the world. If testing is done, it will occur, and as long as we all follow the reader(the seconds) of the world and their paranoid infectious theory, ranchers will suffer.

Time to seach out the cause, instead of following one theory which has never been proven beyond a shadow of a doubt.


Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Ranchers.net's Bull Session Forum Index -> Bull Session All times are GMT - 6 Hours
Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8  Next
Page 1 of 8

 




Powered by phpBB
Copyright © 2001-2011 Ranchers.net
All times are GMT - 6 Hours