|
| Author |
Message |
Chuckie
Member
Joined: 11 Mar 2005
Posts: 367
Location: northeast nebraska
|
 Posted: Sun Mar 13, 2005 9:43 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
ok, so, if the NMA can so easily prove "harm"; to whom? if it's the canadian's, we have no jurisdiction, right? if it's the U.S., again, what harm and to whom? i'm oversimplifying, but you need to make it simple for "stupid", ie, me. r-calf will yell"NO HARM DONE", look at cattle prices this past week!! am i right, or am i right?
anyway, i don't want to get started on THAT. please just address the first section of the post. sorry....
|
|
| Back to top |
|
Sandhusker
Rancher
Joined: 10 Feb 2005
Posts: 18244
Location: Nebraska
|
| Posted: Sun Mar 13, 2005 9:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
reader II,
Agman's comment, "I do see through your claim to be neutral as you have supported virtually evey R-Calf idea on these forums" should tell you something about who you're dealing with.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
agman
Rancher
Joined: 10 Feb 2005
Posts: 1664
Location: Denver, CO
|
| Posted: Sun Mar 13, 2005 11:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
[quote="chuckie"]ok, so, if the NMA can so easily prove "harm"; to whom? if it's the canadian's, we have no jurisdiction, right? if it's the U.S., again, what harm and to whom? i'm oversimplifying, but you need to make it simple for "stupid", ie, me. r-calf will yell"NO HARM DONE", look at cattle prices this past week!! am i right, or am i right?
anyway, i don't want to get started on THAT. please just address the first section of the post. sorry....[/quote]
REsponse...The NMA represents U.S. packers and meat processors. That is your answer. Have a great day.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
