Ranchers.net Bull Session

 
Log in Register Ranchers.net Ranchers.net's Bull Session Forum Index FAQ Memberlist Search


Old Boys club
Goto page 1, 2, 3  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Ranchers.net's Bull Session Forum Index -> Bull Session
Author Message
Tam
Rancher
Rancher


Joined: 10 Feb 2005
Posts: 8696
Location: Sask
PostPosted: Fri Mar 18, 2005 4:51 pm    Post subject: Old Boys club Reply with quote
Taken from an article that was in last weeks Western Producer (the paper that first had the story about R-CALF members owning Canadian cattle that is just now hitting the Billings Gazette) The article was titled "One judge stops the USDA" By Michael Raine

The most interesting part. Shocked
Quote:
Cebull is one of those 28 regional judges and one of two in Montana. He was among President George Bush's first judicial appointees nominated by the U.S. Senators Burns and Baucus in 2001.
His nomination was unusual because Republican Conrad Burns and Democrat Max Baucas agreed on his appointment and jointly petitioned the President and Senate for his approval. Despite sitting on oppisite sides of the Senate they each have supported anti-Canadian trade actions throughout their careers and last week both men voted against the March 7 resumption of live ruminant trade with Canada.



This is the same judge that wouldn't hear any friend of the court briefs, ruled against the USDA in April. Is it a wonder why R-CALF uses him and don't give me well he is right there in their home town he was put there by Baucas and Burns two Anti Trade Senators. How much do you think R-CALF leadership and staunch R-CALF supporters donate to these two Senators reelection campaigns. what did Burns and Baucas had to say to Cebull for him to make a ruling before he even heard the case. We got you into you cushy live time job, and we are going after the Senate and it would sure help if you ruled our way?
You have to wonder if Bush feels the knife twisting in his back now. He appointed the judge that ruled against the USDA twice and the Two Senators that nominated him got the Senate to rule against the USDA too. Better hope that R-CALFers haven't paid for the Montana House Rep. reelection campaigns too.



He also ruled against the NMA case. At least the NMA court case is being appealed. and if this is true then maybe they will have half a chance.

Quote:
Larry Howell of the University of Montana Law School said " The US federal Government knows the road from Billings to San Francisco pretty well. They often make the trip to appeal Montana rulings of one type or another,"



The more we learn the worse this stinks of dirty politics. Mad
Back to top
Oldtimer
Rancher
Rancher


Joined: 10 Feb 2005
Posts: 24734
Location: Northeast Montana
PostPosted: Fri Mar 18, 2005 5:43 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
Tam- It is the common practice of the US Senators to name nominees for vacancies to a US judgeship in their district-- and anyway in Montana, its common for both Senators to drop party affiliation to both back a nominee...

So I see no black helicopter circling there.....
Back to top
Denny
Rancher
Rancher


Joined: 10 Feb 2005
Posts: 4411
Location: Mn usa
PostPosted: Fri Mar 18, 2005 6:47 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
Tam= I bet they get more campaign dollars from them than they do from you.

See this is the United States of America says nothing about canada.
Back to top
Tam
Rancher
Rancher


Joined: 10 Feb 2005
Posts: 8696
Location: Sask
PostPosted: Fri Mar 18, 2005 6:58 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
Oldtimer wrote:
Tam- It is the common practice of the US Senators to name nominees for vacancies to a US judgeship in their district-- and anyway in Montana, its common for both Senators to drop party affiliation to both back a nominee...

So I see no black helicopter circling there.....


Quote:
His nomination was unusual because Republican Conrad Burns and Democrat Max Baucas agreed on his appointment and jointly petitioned the President and Senate for his approval.


Are you sure Say what?


Quote:
Despite sitting on oppisite sides of the Senate they each have supported anti-Canadian trade actions throughout their careers and last week both men voted against the March 7 resumption of live ruminant trade with Canada
.

IS this also common practice in other states.
Back to top
Shelly
Rancher
Rancher


Joined: 10 Feb 2005
Posts: 1631
Location: Saskatchewan
PostPosted: Fri Mar 18, 2005 8:09 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
Speaking of a bitter attitude! Your export markets would be open to your country if you'd open your border to us!
Back to top
Kato
Rancher
Rancher


Joined: 10 Feb 2005
Posts: 2560
Location: Manitoba - At the end of the road
PostPosted: Fri Mar 18, 2005 9:02 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
Brusker, did you get a new hat? Hat

Or do you have a brother who knows how to type too? Cool
Back to top
Tam
Rancher
Rancher


Joined: 10 Feb 2005
Posts: 8696
Location: Sask
PostPosted: Fri Mar 18, 2005 9:03 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
Hat wrote:
Shelly wrote:
Speaking of a bitter attitude! Your export markets would be open to your country if you'd open your border to us!


YOUR A BIG FAT LIAR. YOU HAVE ABSOLUTELY NO WAY OF BACKING THIS COMMENT UP. Shocked



I think Nebrusker/R-Calf Just changed his name what do the rest of you think?
Back to top
Kato
Rancher
Rancher


Joined: 10 Feb 2005
Posts: 2560
Location: Manitoba - At the end of the road
PostPosted: Fri Mar 18, 2005 9:08 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
If it walks like a duck, and quacks like a duck .... Kid
Back to top
Denny
Rancher
Rancher


Joined: 10 Feb 2005
Posts: 4411
Location: Mn usa
PostPosted: Fri Mar 18, 2005 9:20 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
Shelly wrote:
Speaking of a bitter attitude! Your export markets would be open to your country if you'd open your border to us!


SURE pull the other one it has bells on it....
Back to top
Broke Cowboy
Member
Member


Joined: 10 Feb 2005
Posts: 881
Location: With The Herd
PostPosted: Fri Mar 18, 2005 9:25 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
Can't be - he didn't swear. LOL

BC
Back to top
Shelly
Rancher
Rancher


Joined: 10 Feb 2005
Posts: 1631
Location: Saskatchewan
PostPosted: Fri Mar 18, 2005 9:35 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
Are you that stupid? The Japanese have said repeatedly that they'd take your beef if you would open your markets to us. I'm not going to squabble about this with you, you should just do a little more research. This'll just end up in you and I trading insults, and you just aren't worth my time.
Back to top
ranchwife
Rancher
Rancher


Joined: 10 Feb 2005
Posts: 3994
Location: ennis, montana
PostPosted: Fri Mar 18, 2005 9:38 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
Tam wrote:
Hat wrote:
Shelly wrote:
Speaking of a bitter attitude! Your export markets would be open to your country if you'd open your border to us!


YOUR A BIG FAT LIAR. YOU HAVE ABSOLUTELY NO WAY OF BACKING THIS COMMENT UP. Shocked



I think Nebrusker/R-Calf Just changed his name what do the rest of you think?


YUP!!!! (as hanta yo would say)
Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Ranchers.net's Bull Session Forum Index -> Bull Session All times are GMT - 6 Hours
Goto page 1, 2, 3  Next
Page 1 of 3

 




Powered by phpBB
Copyright © 2001-2011 Ranchers.net
All times are GMT - 6 Hours