Ranchers.net Bull Session

 

Log in Register Ranchers.net Ranchers.net's Bull Session Forum Index FAQ Memberlist Search


Montana Judge Sets July Hearing on Canada Cattle

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Ranchers.net's Bull Session Forum Index -> Bull Session
Author Message
PORKER
Rancher
Rancher


Joined: 02 Mar 2005
Posts: 4171
Location: Michigan-Florida

PostPosted: Fri Mar 18, 2005 8:16 pm    Post subject: Montana Judge Sets July Hearing on Canada Cattle Reply with quote

MT Judge sets July hearing

Montana Judge Sets July Hearing on Canada Cattle



Thu March 17, 2005 7:20 PM GMT-05:00

By Richard Cowan



WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The Bush administration will face off in federal court on July 27 with an American rancher group suing to keep the U.S. border closed to imports of live Canadian cattle because of mad cow disease concerns.



U.S. District Court Judge Richard Cebull in Billings, Montana, on Thursday set the court date to hear arguments that pit the U.S. Department of Agriculture against R-CALF USA, an activist rancher group.



R-CALF, which has been successful in two previous attempts with Cebull in restraining beef and cattle trade, is suing to stop USDA from allowing imports of young Canadian cattle. R-CALF has cited two more cases of mad cow disease discovered in Canada at the beginning of 2005.



Two weeks ago, Cebull granted R-CALF's request for a preliminary injunction to temporarily suspend a USDA plan that would have allowed Canada to export young live cattle to the United States for the first time since 2003, when mad cow disease was discovered in Alberta.



At the July hearing in Billings, the judge will hear arguments on whether to make the injunction permanent.



Late Thursday, the U.S. government filed an emergency appeal with the federal appeals court in San Francisco to overturn the preliminary injunction.



"We remain confident that the requirements of the minimal-risk rule, in combination with the animal and public health measures already in place in the United States and Canada, provide the utmost protection to both U.S. consumers and livestock," the USDA said in a statement.



The National Meat Association, a group representing meatpackers, earlier this month also filed an emergency appeal. U.S. meatpackers want quick access to the Canadian cattle, which they say are needed to keep slaughter plants operating efficiently.



R-CALF also wants Cebull to stop U.S. imports of boxed beef from Canada.



The USDA planned to open the U.S. border on March 7 to Canadian cattle younger than 30 months old, saying those animals presented little or no risk for carrying mad cow disease. Scientists believe the brain-wasting disease needs several years to incubate within an animal's brain and nervous system.



On March 3, the U.S. Senate voted 52-46 to maintain a trade ban on Canadian cattle.


Back to top
Broke Cowboy
Member
Member


Joined: 10 Feb 2005
Posts: 881
Location: With The Herd

PostPosted: Fri Mar 18, 2005 8:36 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Excuse my ignorance - as a legal beagle idiot. Does this mean Cebull runs this set of hearings as well?

thanks
BC


Back to top
PORKER
Rancher
Rancher


Joined: 02 Mar 2005
Posts: 4171
Location: Michigan-Florida

PostPosted: Fri Mar 18, 2005 8:56 pm    Post subject: Da Judge Reply with quote

HIS COURT ,HE Rules


Back to top
Moose
Member
Member


Joined: 14 Feb 2005
Posts: 20
Location: Saskatchewan

PostPosted: Fri Mar 18, 2005 9:03 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

What I understand is that Cebull will preside over the July court hearing also. I wonder why they bother as he already has his mind made up (or made up for him) I can only hope that our government will finally get it's head out of the sand and agree to start testing and expand our markets and slaughter capacity. Relying on the US as a market for anything is extremely foolish. (Unless of course if it's oil)


Back to top
Broke Cowboy
Member
Member


Joined: 10 Feb 2005
Posts: 881
Location: With The Herd

PostPosted: Fri Mar 18, 2005 9:09 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Porker

Thanks for the info. I figure the Canucks are going to have to find a new market for the boxed beef as well, from the way I see it at present.

BC


Back to top
PORKER
Rancher
Rancher


Joined: 02 Mar 2005
Posts: 4171
Location: Michigan-Florida

PostPosted: Fri Mar 18, 2005 9:29 pm    Post subject: BSE test Reply with quote

JUST start BSE testing everything and the Koreans and Japanese will beat your DOORS DOWN.


Back to top
Broke Cowboy
Member
Member


Joined: 10 Feb 2005
Posts: 881
Location: With The Herd

PostPosted: Fri Mar 18, 2005 9:57 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Porker

Never will the Canucks test. Their government is too weak and simply unable to make a decision - they tend to be afraid to "offend" anyone.

BC


Back to top
Oldtimer
Rancher
Rancher


Joined: 10 Feb 2005
Posts: 24734
Location: Northeast Montana

PostPosted: Fri Mar 18, 2005 10:29 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Broke Cowboy wrote:
Porker

Never will the Canucks test. Their government is too weak and simply unable to make a decision - they tend to be afraid to "offend" anyone.

BC


Which makes me ask one question-- How do they ever think they will be able to keep their own slaughter plants running? The Parliament was scared to pursue the question when the packers told them where to stick their subpeona-- What makes Canadians think that Tyson and Cargil will ever allow any new plants to compete with them?

I hope I'm wrong- but 5 years from now I see those new plants locked up or owned by the multinationals.......


Back to top
agman
Rancher
Rancher


Joined: 10 Feb 2005
Posts: 1664
Location: Denver, CO

PostPosted: Fri Mar 18, 2005 11:39 pm    Post subject: Re: Da Judge Reply with quote

PORKER wrote:
HIS COURT ,HE Rules


Response...Cebull found out very quickly that it may be his courtroom but he does not rule. Thus the ORDER from the appellate court that he MUST listen to the NMA's appeal for intervenor status after he outright rejected their request in his court.

A three judge panel from the Ninth Circuit Court will decide the outcome of the emergency appeals in April, not judge Cebull. As I previously stated there is a new sheriff in town and his name is neither Cebull nor Oldtimer. Let the justice system work. Have a great day.


Back to top
PORKER
Rancher
Rancher


Joined: 02 Mar 2005
Posts: 4171
Location: Michigan-Florida

PostPosted: Sat Mar 19, 2005 7:11 pm    Post subject: BIG Business Reply with quote

Thus the ORDER from the appellate court that he MUST listen to the NMA's appeal for intervenor status after he outright rejected their request in his court.
Yes He'll listen and thats about it.This is what you get from the STATUS QUO ! The customers health is of no concern or the nations health 20 years from now.Sounds like the World Com deal,Just how much can we get away with and not hurt my pocketbook.The BIG Packers want control to fill their pockets either side of the border at everyones expence.The World is just so big.


Back to top
Tam
Rancher
Rancher


Joined: 10 Feb 2005
Posts: 8696
Location: Sask

PostPosted: Sat Mar 19, 2005 8:36 pm    Post subject: Re: BIG Business Reply with quote

PORKER wrote:
Thus the ORDER from the appellate court that he MUST listen to the NMA's appeal for intervenor status after he outright rejected their request in his court.
Yes He'll listen and thats about it.This is what you get from the STATUS QUO ! The customers health is of no concern or the nations health 20 years from now.Sounds like the World Com deal,Just how much can we get away with and not hurt my pocketbook.The BIG Packers want control to fill their pockets either side of the border at everyones expence.The World is just so big.


NMA represent the small packers don't they?
Isn't R-CALF doing this to protect the high prices the US ranchers are pocketing? It's OK if R-CALF fills their pockets at the expense of the US packing industry and consumer confidence but damn the packers if they try save their industry from R-CALFs actions. Rolling Eyes


Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Ranchers.net's Bull Session Forum Index -> Bull Session All times are GMT - 6 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 




Powered by phpBB
Copyright © 2001-2011 Ranchers.net
All times are GMT - 6 Hours