|
| Author |
Message |
mc486 Member

Joined: 03 Jun 2010 Posts: 13 Location: Waterdown, Ontario
|
Posted: Tue Jun 15, 2010 9:54 pm Post subject: Albertan BSE Cause |
|
|
Hi Everyone,
I was asked how I could say that the above described BSE bone meal exposure /terrorism is the only kind of BSE exposure event which could cause the Albertan BSE ?
As you all know when the cattle with full blown BSE were discovered in Alberta, thousands from their herds were tested but no others showed positive. No BSE asymptomatic cattle were discovered. How could this be? Only a high level of exposure would cause this; such as directly feeding the Albertan Cattle with BSE containing bone meal from the UK made in the 1990's.
As you probably know Ridley has had a 6 million dollar fine placed against it by the Federal court of Canada as it was determined that it was one of their cattle feed supplements that caused the Albertan BSE. The exact brand number is known and mentioned on line. As they never imported any Cattle products from the UK their liability was limited. How then could this happen? When Ridley makes a batch of its feed supplement it would obviously be homogenized by this process and they would have produced dozens of drums in a batch. These drums of homogenized feed supplement would be feed to thousands of cattle and would create as many cases of cattle BSE. Why did this not occur? This is because as mentioned in previous posts Jim Wood only added the 20 to 30 Kg of BSE bone meal he took through Winnipeg out to Alberta to the top a few drums. This occurred in late 1998 and was documented in the last page of the 23 page report. This is why only a small number(17) of Albertan Cattle came down with the full blown disease. If you look to previous post that mentions the Albertan Cattleman's page you will see this. That exposure to a single BSE causing event causes this disease in most cattle after between 2 and 8 years. This is a 6 year span. The Albertan BSE cases occurred from 2003 to 2009 or a 6 year span. That's because the Albertan BSE cases were the product of a single exposure event by Herb Campbell and Jim Wood. If what the Canadian BSE Lawyers describe in their case against the Canadian Government were true it would have caused thousands of cases starting just before the mid 1990's and carrying on to today.
It's easy for me to reverse engineer this situation and its causation as I know exactly what caused it. This is detailed in my previous posts and backed up in the 23 page document as well as other documentation I have sent out as attachments . Just email me at eharry8@hotmail.com for a copy. These documents contain a copy of the tag from one of the two bags of BSE bone meal illegally brought here from Ireland in 1998 by Herb Campbell. It contains documents and emails signed by Herb Campbell incriminating him as the importer of the BSE bone meal that caused the Albertan BSE. In addition it clearly shows that I was contacting people/government officials and warning them about this BSE situation years before it surfaced in Alberta.
The reason for the government delaying the court proceedings to do with this Albertan BSE situation another 3 years is so that it will then be ten years after the fact of the first Albertan BSE occurrence. This is so that when the Cattle farmers of Alberta are finally told they will be receiving nothing for their loses the story will end up on the back page. Everyone will say what do you expect its been ten years! If you had a real case the government would have compensated you years ago! Without hard evidence of Canadian government wrong doing/involvement in the causation of the Albertan BSE the Cattle farmers of Alberta/Canada have little to make a claim with. This is the very evidence we have been sending out in the form of actual documents/evidence from 1998. The British Cattle producers were compensated for 50% of there loses without years of fighting. Their BSE situation was the product of an unintentional accident/recycle loop that went on for decades by their feed supplement providers.
The Albertan BSE was caused by an intentional act of bio terrorism by a few former Canadian Government people operating out of a Canadian Government facility. The Albertan Cattle people should therefore obviously be fully compensated for both their losses and damages by the Canadian Government! In 2005 the losses and damages alone were pegged at over $20 billion US. One American Cattle legal group I have contacted said all the documentation I have is very good and applicable to a court proceeding but most limitation acts limit the time to begin a legal proceeding to a couple years after the discovery of a claim. I mentioned to them the fact that there is no statute of limitations on acts of terrorism. They absolutely agreed that I could then proceed at any time.
Regards,
S.R. Harrison
Last edited by mc486 on Sat Jul 03, 2010 9:25 pm; edited 5 times in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
TSR Rancher

Joined: 27 Apr 2005 Posts: 1761
|
Posted: Wed Jun 16, 2010 8:06 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Rather than have readers here try to sift through so much material, how about someone knowledgeable summarize why these people alledgedly introduced the infected material into the feed. What were they gaining by doing so?
|
|
| Back to top |
|
flounder Rancher

Joined: 03 Sep 2005 Posts: 2526 Location: TEXAS
|
Posted: Wed Jun 16, 2010 8:44 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Kato wrote: |
Actually, he's not trying to get ranchers together to sue the government. They are already together and have been in the process of suing the government since 2005. It's been in court for years now being certified as a legitimate class action suit. It started as several suits, and has now been combined into one national suit. Government lawyers tried to block it moving forward before eight different judges, and were unsuccessful every time. Next time it goes to court it's for a decision.
Estimates are that with appeals and such that could go on for ten more years, so the petition is to send a message to the government to appoint a mediator and settle it now.
And that's the facts.
Any Canucks here who would like a petition? PM me. |
cpallett@pallettlaw.ca
http://www.bseclassaction.ca/english/team.htm
Monday, April 12, 2010 |
By Will Verboven
BSE Lawsuit Moves Slowly Through The Courts
CLAIMS . Lawyer seeks to amalgamate provincial actions into a single national class-action case
CAMERON PALLET “I felt that after looking at the circumstances, the federal government couldn’t get away with this”
TORONTO LAWYER, LEGAL COUNSEL
More than 200 cattle producers attended a March 31 rally here to hear the latest update on a class-action lawsuit to recover damages from alleged federal mishandling of BSE.
The meeting, organized by Ponoka-area rancher Randy Kaiser, was Alberta’s first major information session on the lawsuit.
This legal action has been working its way through provincial courts since 2005 when the original statements of claim were filed in Alberta, Ontario, Quebec and Manitoba. The claims were filed on behalf of individual cattle producers in those provinces with the intent of seeing them all amalgamated into a single class-action lawsuit. The defendant will be the government of Canada.
The claim states that Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada was negligent in the manner it dealt with the BSE outbreak and that subsequently had a severe economic impact on the livelihood of cattle producers in Canada.
Cameron Pallet, a Toronto lawyer, is the lead legal counsel in this lawsuit. The case is represented in Alberta by Clint Docken of Calgary. Progress in the case has been slow and Pallet said news has been kept low key on purpose. “We didn’t want to create false hope by promising that it would be an easy and quick case,” he told the rally.
Pallet said that some progress has been made with judges in the provinces accepting the case and agreeing to a process to amalgamate the various provincial actions into one class-action lawsuit. The government lawyers have tried to have the case thrown out of court, but to this point have failed.
After laying out the background to the case Pallet said, “I felt that after looking at the circumstances, the federal government couldn’t get away with this.”
Pallet said it has taken five years to get to this point but may take as much as 10 years if the case were to end up in the Supreme Court. Pallet told the audience. He said that the case has some precedents in its favour, but noted that the government spent years fighting the residential school and hepatitis C lawsuits until finally coming to a settlement.
Pallet encouraged cattle producers to contact their local MPs, MLAs and even the Prime Minister to tell them to settle. “Cattle producers have to create the political will to settle this case just like it was done in the other class-action cases”
Members of the audience asked whether provincial cattle organizations such as Alberta Beef Producers supported the lawsuit. Pallet said that to this point they were not involved in any way but he encouraged producers to contact their cattle organizations.
A spokesperson for the ABP said it was not involved because the lawsuit is considered a private business legal action.
http://www.agcanada.com/Article.aspx?ID=21215
TSS
|
|
| Back to top |
|
Kato Rancher

Joined: 10 Feb 2005 Posts: 2560 Location: Manitoba - At the end of the road
|
Posted: Wed Jun 16, 2010 10:36 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: |
| As you probally know Ridley has had a 6 million dollar fine placed against it by the federal court of Canada as it was determined that it was one of there cattle feed suppliments that caused the Albertan BSE. |
Not quite. They settled out of court for six million dollars. This is funding the rest of the legal bills for Canadian producers, with leftover money being donated to veterinary colleges. They have also been released from any further liability in this matter.
As for the organizations, they are not officially involved for a reason. This is between individual cattle producers, and the government, and as far as the petitions are concerned, they are not meant to be from any one group. A lot of people have parked their politics at the door, and are working on this together, with no official leadership. This is how it needs to be. People who normally would never work together on any other issue are working together now. We're just a bunch of citizens with a common goal.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
mc486 Member

Joined: 03 Jun 2010 Posts: 13 Location: Waterdown, Ontario
|
Posted: Thu Jun 17, 2010 2:13 am Post subject: This is Why these people did this |
|
|
Above I was asked why these people did this. This is a short version:
I guess the situation of funding for these people came to a head when the millions of dollars in funding these people expected to get from the Alberta Oil Sands Project fell through. This Herb Campbell traveled to Calgary thinking this Marc Halevy would meet him there with a winning proposal to the Alberta Oil company technology reps. to get funding. Apparently Marc Halevy didn't even show up for the meeting. Some people said he was up all night drinking. Others said that knowing the Alberta Oil company technology reps. hated him and would humiliate him at the meeting, Marc Halevy chose not to go.
Anyways the funding from the Alberta Oil companies was lost. Of course, these former government employees thought they had a right to be mad. They would not be able to sustain their positions. They felt that this was the end for them. These people were the most arogant SOBs I had ever met. I can remember a couple of months in which all they talked about was how wrong and messed up Alberta was. I remember bringing up the subject of a former employee in our division (Industrial Division) Mark Preston who had left several years before. He was from Burlington, Ontario. Somehow the conversation got twisted around by these people to him being from Alberta and that he must therefore be an idiot. It was at this point that this BSE/Bone meal showed up. These former government people really did believe they had a right to be mad at Alberta. I guess this is were all Terrorism comes from. People who believe they have been wronged and that they would get even regardless of how many innocent lives they destroy.
One thing I probably mentioned before is the fact that these WTI people closely associated themselves with the Ontario government people and saw them as there peers. They always talked about how the Ontario government was being cut back because of Mike Harris(our then Premiere) having to follow Premiere Kliens of Alberta actions to reduce deficit spending. This was so to keep our bond ratings in Ontario in a sensible range to reduce the high interest on our high provincial debt. The WTI people and their Ontario government friends both saw this as effecting their life blood and as being Premiere Kliens and the people of Alberta who elected him fault for causing this problem for them.
There are also a number of other reasons these people had disliked Alberta and its people that is too lengthy to go into here. We have people who can coroberate this in Alberta.
Regards,
S.R. Harrison
|
|
| Back to top |
|
mc486 Member

Joined: 03 Jun 2010 Posts: 13 Location: Waterdown, Ontario
|
Posted: Sat Jun 26, 2010 8:08 am Post subject: What did Ridley really pay? |
|
|
Quote: As you probally know Ridley has had a 6 million dollar fine placed against it by the federal court of Canada as it was determined that it was one of there cattle feed suppliments that caused the Albertan BSE.
Quote:
Not quite. They settled out of court for six million dollars. This is funding the rest of the legal bills for Canadian producers, with leftover money being donated to veterinary colleges. They have also been released from any further liability in this matter.
I contacted Ridley in 2005 and told them about the Albertan BSE situation information I had. They kept calling back every 30 minutes until I finally faxed them the information. I had changed my address just after this time and did not get back to them. They might very well have investigated this situation and used this information to make a secret deal with Government of Canada out of court. When you state that Ridley " settled out of court for six million dollars" and "have also been released from any further liability in this matter" it does seem a little fishy. Behind closed doors you don't really know what happened or who really payed what.
Regards,
S.R. Harrison
|
|
| Back to top |
|
mc486 Member

Joined: 03 Jun 2010 Posts: 13 Location: Waterdown, Ontario
|
Posted: Tue Aug 17, 2010 8:42 pm Post subject: Blocked from Google Canada |
|
|
Hi Everyone,
The URL for this blog is being blocked from Google Canada by the Government of Canada. This is how I know this. A few weeks after I put this blog up a friend of mine typed "cause of Albertan BSE" into Google Canada and this blog came up as number one and two. A little more than a month later he did this again but this blog not only did not come up in the top ten for "cause of Albertan BSE" , but could not be found on Google Canada. He told me that even if the Ranchers.net forum was down this blog would still be in Google Canada’s catch unless it was removed or blocked. It’s not that hard to remove a URL for a blog from Google Canada but only the Federal Government of Canada can tell them to block a URL for a particular blog. We entered the blog titles for the blogs before and after this one plus Ranchers.net and they all came up as number ones on Google Canada's search engine. My friend went to the Google Canada site for entering a URL for a blog into their data base. He did this for both this URL and the URL for the original copy of this blog at the Cattle Today forum. A few days later we checked and found that the URL for this blog on Google Canada came up for the Cattle Today forum post but not for this Ranchers net forum. In other words this blog is being blocked on Google Canada by the Federal Government of Canada. The reason for the Federal Government of Canada to be blocking this blog here over the one at the Cattle Today forum is that they know that there are a lot more Albertan/Canadian Cattle farmers who come here. Also most people use Google Canada as a search engine in Canada.
A few days after this above blocking I received a pdf formatted letter from Jim Prentis - the Canadian Minister of the Environment responsible for the federal facility where this BSE/bone meal was illegally imported through that caused the Albertan BSE. I had last contacted his ministry many months ago and sent a copy of the 23 page report along with documentation showing what this Herb Campbell/Jim Wood had done with this illegally imported BSE/bone meal. Jim Prentis replied to this message stating that "this facility was being run by a private company - WTI between the years of 1996 and 1999 and what happened there in these years was not the responsibility of the Canadian Government" . The facts here are this. The time charged for the project involving this illegally imported BSE/bone meal from Ireland was charged to overhead or the Government of Canada’s account. You’re hard earned tax dollars at work. The equipment used for the project as well as the facility belonged to the Government of Canada. This Herb Campbell and Jim Wood were former Canadian Government employees (LWOPS). This illegal importation of BSE bone meal could not have occurred without the Government of Canada and their facility at CCIW. This is shown well in the documentation I have forwarded to many of you.
I hope that the Government of Canada unblocks this URL/blog from Google Canada so all Canadian Cattle farmers can find/see it. Like today!
Regards,
S.R. Harrison
Last edited by mc486 on Fri Aug 20, 2010 2:44 am; edited 2 times in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
flounder Rancher

Joined: 03 Sep 2005 Posts: 2526 Location: TEXAS
|
Posted: Wed Aug 18, 2010 9:05 am Post subject: Re: Blocked from Google Canada |
|
|
BP buys Google, Yahoo search words to keep people away from real news on Gulf oil disaster Monday, June 7, 2010 at 1:00 PM by GottaLaff 3 Comments and 0 Reactions I didn’t see this report yesterday, but I’m not surprised by it. Nothing BP does, or doesn’t do, surprises me. Why should this be different:
In their most tenacious effort to control the ‘spin’ on the worst oil spill disaster in the history, BP has purchased top internet search engine words so they can re-direct people away from real news on the Deepwater Horizon catastrophe.
BP spokesman Toby Odone confirmed to ABC News that the oil giant had in fact bought internet search terms. So now when someone searches the words ‘oil spill’, on the internet, the top link will re-direct them to BP’s official company website.
http://www.google.com/search?q=cwd&hl=en&tbo=s&tbs=nws:1,sbd:1&source=lnt&sa=X&ei=jrQOTNv0O4L68AbX_YzICA&ved=0CBsQpwU#hl=en&q=bp%20buying%20up%20google%20search%20titles&wrapid=tlif12821438218712&um=1&ie=UTF-8&sa=N&tab=nw&fp=e2e77dd66464889a
| mc486 wrote: |
Hi Everyone,
The URL for this blog is being blocked from Google Canada by the Government of Canada. This is how I know this. A few weeks after I put this blog up a friend of mine typed "cause of Albertan BSE" into Google Canada and this blog came up as number one and two. A little more than a month later he did this again but this blog not only did not come up in the top ten for "cause of Albertan BSE" , but could not be found on Google Canada. He told me that even if the Ranchers.net forum was down this blog would still be in Google Canada’s catch unless it was removed or blocked. It’s not that hard to remove a URL for a blog from Google Canada but only the Federal Government of Canada can tell them to block a URL for a particular blog. We entered the blog titles for the blogs before and after this one plus Ranchers.net and they all came up as number ones on Google Canada's search engine. My friend went to the Google Canada site for entering a URL for a blog into their data base. He did this for both this URL and the URL for the original copy of this blog at the Cattle Today forum. A few days later we checked and found that the URL for this blog on Google Canada came up for the Cattle Today forum post but not for this Ranchers net forum. In other words this blog is being blocked on Google Canada by the Federal Government of Canada. The reason for the Federal Government of Canada to be blocking this blog here over the one at the Cattle Today forum is that they know that there are a lot more Albertan/Canadian Cattle farmers who come here. Also most people use Google Canada as a search engine in Canada.
A few days after this above blocking I received a pdf formatted letter from Jim Prentis - the Canadian Minister of the Environment responsible for the federal facility where this BSE/bone meal was illegally imported through that caused the Albertan BSE. I had last contacted his ministry a couple of years ago and sent a copy of the 23 page report along with documentation showing what this Herb Campbell/Jim Wood had done with this illegally imported BSE/bone meal. Jim Prentis replied to this message stating that "this facility was being run by a private company - WTI between the years of 1996 and 1999 and what happened there in these years was not the responsibility of the Canadian Government" . The facts here are this. The time charged for the project involving this illegally imported BSE/bone meal from Ireland was charged to overhead or the Government of Canada’s account. You’re hard earned tax dollars at work. The equipment used for the project as well as the facility belonged to the Government of Canada. This Herb Campbell and Jim Wood were former Canadian Government employees (LWOPS). This illegal importation of BSE bone meal could not have occurred without the Government of Canada and their facility at CCIW. This is shown well in the documentation I have forwarded to many of you.
I hope that the Government of Canada unblocks this URL/blog from Google Canada so all Canadian Cattle farmers can find/see it. Like today!
Regards,
S.R. Harrison |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
flounder Rancher

Joined: 03 Sep 2005 Posts: 2526 Location: TEXAS
|
Posted: Sat Aug 28, 2010 12:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
No one has given an acceptable explanation as to how cattle are being exposed to BSE prions in countries where the feeding of meat and bone meal has been outlawed for over 15 years!!! The unfortunate victims of BSE are coming into contact with the prions somewhere. Knowing the fact that prions are indestructible, knowing the fact that prions may seed down the environment, knowing there is no method of satisfactory disinfection for BSE prions, and knowing there is no treatment for animals that contract BSE, why would the USDA consider allowing such a horrendous disease to enter the United States of America? The real answer will surprise you:
1) The USDA subscribes to the idea that BSE can arise in a particular population of cattle spontaneously. In other words, the USDA believes BSE may, in fact, already infect cattle in the United States through the process of spontaneous generation of the abnormal prions that cause BSE. I have heard with my own ears this theory espoused by a USDA veterinarian at the January 2003 annual Kansas Cattlemen’s Association convention at Dodge City, Kansas. This USDA veterinarian even expressed his view that the US may have exported BSE to Canada in the early 1990’s with the exportation of US meat and bone meal to the Canadian feed industry.
2) The USDA has determined that the US beef cattle industry is part of a North American system. Beef cattle in Canada, the United States, and Mexico are all part of one big integrated system. Chandler Keys, a National Cattlemen’s Association spokesman has stated this concept in this manner, and I quote, "It's a good lesson for all of us," said Keys. "We've got to strive to work together. We're a North American system." The last time I looked, no Canadian has offered to pay my income taxes, property taxes, or veterinary inspection fees. When I called the Canadian Embassy and asked about exporting cattle from Missouri to Alberta, I was told Canada would not accept cattle from Missouri because of the possibility of Missouri cattle being infected with Blue Tongue and Anaplasmosis. So much for a North American cattle industry.
3) The USDA is convinced that by boning out meat and removing certain Specified Risk Materials (brain, spinal chord, lymph nodes, ileum, etc), the risk of spreading BSE prions is minimal. This may well be an acceptable method to reduce spread of BSE prions associated with raw meat, but what about live cattle? Live cattle harboring BSE prions, like live deer and elk that harbor Chronic Wasting Disease prions, shed BSE prions into their environment and may take months or years to actually die of this dread disease. Italy, England, Ireland, and Spain all have discovered many new cases of BSE in live cattle during this past year. They have had control measures in place since the late 1980’s and early 1990’s. Japan continues to discover new cases of BSE in younger and younger animals. We cannot afford to have consumer confidence in beef potentially undermined by continually finding new, and unexplained, cases of BSE in the United States.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
mc486 Member

Joined: 03 Jun 2010 Posts: 13 Location: Waterdown, Ontario
|
Posted: Tue Aug 31, 2010 1:02 am Post subject: |
|
|
Hi Flounder and Everyone,
I will attempt to answer Flounders excellent argument for spontaneous BSE clusters and why they occur.
The rate of BSE occurrence in cattle is one in six million according to the USDAs website. There were about 2 million cattle in Alberta at the time of their BSE outbreak. This means that probability wise that about one third of one case of BSE could occur in Alberta. 17 cases have actually occurred. How then did this occur? The only known risk factor for BSE is for cattle to be feed with bone meal made from cattle infected with BSE. This is the vector for BSE. This is the position also held by the Alberta’s Cattlemen’s website as previously mentioned. This is exactly what has been described on this blog and backed up with documentation from 1998 the time of this illegal BSE bone meal importation.
Then how could other BSE clusters occur such as the one in Japan? The claim that spontaneous BSE clusters can occur I believe is an empirical claim. They happen and because there is no explanation they must be accepted as a possible reason for BSE cluster occurrence. I believe that all BSE clusters are purposely created for reasons such as economics or revenge. I will explain with an example.
This is a hypothetical situation that could explain Japans BSE cluster. In the 1980's and 1990's beef was making great strides in Japan. Their traditional seafood diet was beginning to be upstaged by beef. Once you try beef you don't go back. This was cutting into the seafood sectors profitability. A major seafood company in Japan gets contacted by a British man with access to BSE/bone meal. He says that for a sizable fee he will put several duffel bags of this BSE/bone meal on a flight to Japan. He explains that by adding this BSE/bone meal to the top of drums of cattle feed supplement in Japan it will create BSE there and their seafood sectors market share will come back. He also explains that this will occur after several years so there is no chance of them being caught. This is only one scenario and is a possible reason for Japans BSE cluster.
Such scenarios are obviously possible for all BSE clusters. There was a mountain of BSE/bone meal in the UK in the 1990's and that guy with access to it is looking to make a bundle at the expense of the world beef market.
Every action has a consequence, every effect a cause. Everything happens for a reason. This could very well explain the occurance of BSE clusters in the world.
Regards,
S.R. Harrison
|
|
| Back to top |
|
flounder Rancher

Joined: 03 Sep 2005 Posts: 2526 Location: TEXAS
|
Posted: Tue Aug 31, 2010 9:06 am Post subject: |
|
|
| mc486 wrote: |
Hi Flounder and Everyone,
I will attempt to answer Flounders excellent argument for spontaneous BSE clusters and why they occur.
The rate of BSE occurrence in cattle is one in six million according to the USDAs website. There were about 2 million cattle in Alberta at the time of their BSE outbreak. This means that probability wise that about one third of one case of BSE could occur in Alberta. 17 cases have actually occurred. How then did this occur? The only known risk factor for BSE is for cattle to be feed with bone meal made from cattle infected with BSE. This is the vector for BSE. This is the position also held by the Alberta’s Cattlemen’s website as previously mentioned. This is exactly what has been described on this blog and backed up with documentation from 1998 the time of this illegal BSE bone meal importation.
Then how could other BSE clusters occur such as the one in Japan? The claim that spontaneous BSE clusters can occur I believe is an empirical claim. They happen and because there is no explanation they must be accepted as a possible reason for BSE cluster occurrence. I believe that all BSE clusters are purposely created for reasons such as economics or revenge. I will explain with an example.
This is a hypothetical situation that could explain Japans BSE cluster. In the 1980's and 1990's beef was making great strides in Japan. Their traditional seafood diet was beginning to be upstaged by beef. Once you try beef you don't go back. This was cutting into the seafood sectors profitability. A major seafood company in Japan gets contacted by a British man with access to BSE/bone meal. He says that for a sizable fee he will put several duffel bags of this BSE/bone meal on a flight to Japan. He explains that by adding this BSE/bone meal to the top of drums of cattle feed supplement in Japan it will create BSE there and their seafood sectors market share will come back. He also explains that this will occur after several years so there is no chance of them being caught. This is only one scenario and is a possible reason for Japans BSE cluster.
Such scenarios are obviously possible for all BSE clusters. There was a mountain of BSE/bone meal in the UK in the 1990's and that guy with access to it is looking to make a bundle at the expense of the world beef market.
Every action has a consequence, every effect a cause. Everything happens for a reason. This could very well explain the occurance of BSE clusters in the world.
Regards,
S.R. Harrison |
Greetings Mr. Harrison,
i don't believe the theory of spontaneous sporadic mutation of natural field TSE's in humans or animals. as you, i believe there is a source and there is a route of all natural human and animal TSE. some may be more susceptible to a particular TSE in a given location, and that could be for any number of reasons, but the _ genetic susceptibility_ is the key to the clusters from whatever route and source of the TSE agent in any given location, and that could be more than one strain too. my opinion. ...TSS
Tuesday, July 27, 2010
Spontaneous generation of mammalian prions
http://madcowspontaneousnot.blogspot.com/2010/07/spontaneous-generation-of-mammalian.html
|
|
| Back to top |
|
mc486 Member

Joined: 03 Jun 2010 Posts: 13 Location: Waterdown, Ontario
|
Posted: Sun Nov 07, 2010 8:39 pm Post subject: Information |
|
|
Hi Everyone,
I have been asked repeatedly why I have kept all of this (over 200 pages) documentation concerning the illegal importation to Ontario and then out to Alberta in 1998 of this BSE/bone meal that caused the Alberta BSE situation.
Here's Why:
When this BSE/bone meal first showed up it became evident that this Herb Campbell had no honest reason for him to illegally import this material. As shown in the 23 page document I've been emailing out the project number used was non-existent. Not to be found anywhere on the 4 page comprehensive list of WTI projects numbers from that time included in the 23 page document. The project was hidden by charging it to overhead or government. This was a hidden project for the obvious reason that this project was a ruse used to get this BSE/bone meal to Ontario. Herb Campbell wanted no one to know about it. I have documentation showing that the money WTI would be receiving for this project was only a small fraction of what it cost. This at a time when the company/facility was almost bankrupt. There was no chance of recovering this cost from further testing as the pilot unit along with the technology had been sold to a company in Austrialia a year before. This Herb Campbell went way out on a limb to get this BSE/bone meal here just as the Alkida went out on a limb to cause 911.
To get this BSE/bone meal to Ontario the two duffle bags were illegally put on a flight from Ireland. Herb Campbell as mentioned above was extremely accommodating to this Pearce from Ireland to get him to put the two duffle bags of BSE/bone meal on this flight from Ireland as luggage. I knew as previously mentioned that Herb Campbell had been repeatedly humiliated by people from the province of Alberta regarding getting lucrative project money from them. This was not some real injustice but only his own fault.. This meant he and his ex-government group would not be able to continue with there high paid positions at this government of Canada facility. This greatly angered him and this group as they had almost no projects left to sustain them.
When I saw that this project was only an excuse/ruse to get this BSE/bone meal here I thought that one day the RCMP would show up at my door to charge me in connection with this illegal importation. That’s why I documented everything around this situation. This is what your suppose to do. From what I had read online as well as documents I received from Ministry of Agriculture in 1999 (some of these pages are included in the 23 page report) I found out that just importation of this BSE/bone meal illegally is a major Federal offence. This because of this materials potential to destroy the Beef industry here in Canada which is exactly what happened.
When I discovered what this BSE/bone meal really was I contacted the government and they were appalled at this. In the 23 page document there is a copy of Dr. George Mraz card from the Canadian Food Inspection Agency who came and picked up part of one of the two bags of BSE/bone meal. I thought this would end whatever they were doing with this BSE/bone meal but people who were bent the way these people were are very determined. The facts behind Albertas BSE show that thinking it was caused by a mistake/accident is like believing 911 was caused by pilot error.
I have documentation to back up the claims from the time of these occurrences for virtually every event surrounding this Albertan BSE causing situation.
Regards.
S.R. Harrison
Last edited by mc486 on Thu Nov 18, 2010 3:08 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
|