|
| Author |
Message |
Maple Leaf Angus Rancher

Joined: 10 Feb 2005 Posts: 1823 Location: Southern Ontario
|
Posted: Fri Mar 11, 2005 1:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| I'll bet you are right, Don. It appears that the NMA wants to show r-calf that the litigation knife can cut both ways. And it will be interesting to see what happens if/when they suceed.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
SMS Member

Joined: 10 Feb 2005 Posts: 79 Location: Alberta
|
Posted: Fri Mar 11, 2005 1:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
wouldn't that be sweet if RCalf has to post a bond to protect the packers....lol
I wonder if Leo will put up Midlands Bull test as security? or if Bullard will use his little shack in the woods?
I bet they wont....they will go begging hat in hand to the producer again.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
don Rancher

Joined: 10 Feb 2005 Posts: 1574 Location: saskatchewan
|
Posted: Fri Mar 11, 2005 1:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I wonder if Leo will put up Midlands Bull test as security? or if Bullard will use his little shack in the woods?
i'm sure the r-calfers will come out of the woodwork to volunteer security. right oldtimer and haymaker?
|
|
| Back to top |
|
rancher Rancher

Joined: 10 Feb 2005 Posts: 1059
|
Posted: Fri Mar 11, 2005 2:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| So if the border opens and we producers lose money we can sue the packers and have them bonded? I say since the judge ruled on it they are barking up the wrong tree on trying to bond R-calf.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
SASH Member

Joined: 10 Feb 2005 Posts: 567 Location: Southern Manitoba
|
Posted: Fri Mar 11, 2005 2:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Boy, sounds like you R-CALF guys might have to donate alot more calves at your sales to pay this off. Good Luck.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
foodmarket Member

Joined: 11 Mar 2005 Posts: 18 Location: NJ
|
|
| Back to top |
|
don Rancher

Joined: 10 Feb 2005 Posts: 1574 Location: saskatchewan
|
Posted: Fri Mar 11, 2005 5:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
rancher - So if the border opens and we producers lose money we can sue the packers and have them bonded?
i would guess if they got the border opened under false pretences or in an illegal manner they might have some liability. this effort by the nma probably won't succeed in my guesstimation but it does put the r-calf spokespeople on notice that they might be held responsible for what they say.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
Bill Rancher

Joined: 10 Feb 2005 Posts: 2067 Location: GWN
|
Posted: Fri Mar 11, 2005 5:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| rancher wrote: |
| So if the border opens and we producers lose money we can sue the packers and have them bonded? I say since the judge ruled on it they are barking up the wrong tree on trying to bond R-calf. |
Beef industry? Cattle industry? Seems like it is one industry after all.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
rancher Rancher

Joined: 10 Feb 2005 Posts: 1059
|
|
| Back to top |
|
sw Rancher

Joined: 14 Feb 2005 Posts: 1374
|
Posted: Fri Mar 11, 2005 6:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| I heard today that the amount is 7million a week that R_Calf would have to come up with. If you combined Leo, Pat Goggins and all of the rest of them, they could maybe cover a month. This could get very interesting!!!
|
|
| Back to top |
|
Bill Rancher

Joined: 10 Feb 2005 Posts: 2067 Location: GWN
|
|
| Back to top |
|
Bull Burger Member

Joined: 14 Feb 2005 Posts: 212 Location: Fruited Plains of western SD
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|