Ranchers.net Bull Session

 

Log in Register Ranchers.net Ranchers.net's Bull Session Forum Index FAQ Memberlist Search


Montana-YES to drugs, NO to beef.
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Ranchers.net's Bull Session Forum Index -> Bull Session
Author Message
Murgen
Rancher
Rancher


Joined: 12 Feb 2005
Posts: 2117
Location: Ontario

PostPosted: Sun Mar 13, 2005 9:17 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
GW and the FDA says Canadian drugs are untested and unsafe- even if we buy them in the same drugstore you do.... Canadians are not to be trusted with their drugs.....



OT, here is a perfect example of a a product that some claim to be unsafe, with COOL and the US citizens are still buying it. Explain again how COOL will work to benefit the US rancher?


Back to top
Denny
Rancher
Rancher


Joined: 10 Feb 2005
Posts: 4412
Location: Mn usa

PostPosted: Sun Mar 13, 2005 9:47 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Murgen wrote:
Hat, you were on the fence, but you fell off on one side very quickly, good luck on this site, you've just added yourself to the minority.



Thats because the majority on here are from canada........


Back to top
Denny
Rancher
Rancher


Joined: 10 Feb 2005
Posts: 4412
Location: Mn usa

PostPosted: Sun Mar 13, 2005 9:51 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Shelly wrote:
MR, he is an R-calfer. Just curious, did you have a bad day today? You seem a little wound up. Calm down, don't let those R-calf buggers get to you so much. I'd miss reading your posts if something should happen to you like Jared. He kind of disappeared, don't want you to.



Well the way MR post he should have went with Jared they were both the same at that time and it was the spurs from MR that got Jared going.MR is not one bit better than Jared..........................................


Back to top
Oldtimer
Rancher
Rancher


Joined: 10 Feb 2005
Posts: 24735
Location: Northeast Montana

PostPosted: Sun Mar 13, 2005 10:15 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Murgen wrote:
Quote:
GW and the FDA says Canadian drugs are untested and unsafe- even if we buy them in the same drugstore you do.... Canadians are not to be trusted with their drugs.....



OT, here is a perfect example of a a product that some claim to be unsafe, with COOL and the US citizens are still buying it. Explain again how COOL will work to benefit the US rancher?


Are you aware how much cheaper Canadian drugs are? The majority are at least 1/3 cheaper- many are 1/2 to 2/3 cheaper.... If Canadians can sell their beef for 1/2 price, I agree COOL won't make a difference....

A good sign for Canadians is that US consumers have more confidence in and prefer Canadian drugs over those made in Mexico, Honduras, Caribbean Islands or Asia....All these are available on the internet...

Personally I think GW should be working harder on those internet backroom labs and the illegal drugs coming across the Mexican border rather than the little old lady that gets her mail order of blood presssure and rheumatis prescription from Canada--- but it looks like the big money of the pharmaceutical lobbies talk loudest....


Back to top
TimH
Rancher
Rancher


Joined: 10 Feb 2005
Posts: 1421
Location: Southwest Manitoba

PostPosted: Sun Mar 13, 2005 10:42 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Oldtimer-"If Canadians can sell their beef for 1/2 price, I agree COOL won't make a difference.... "

You baffled me again OT !!!!! Are you saying that PRICE and not a "Born ,raised and slaughtered in USA" label will dictate which product a consumer will buy???? Shocked


Back to top
Oldtimer
Rancher
Rancher


Joined: 10 Feb 2005
Posts: 24735
Location: Northeast Montana

PostPosted: Sun Mar 13, 2005 12:01 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Bull Burger wrote:
Oldtimer wrote:
Manitoba_Rancher wrote:
I say close the border to these drugs going south. A little leverage really helps deal with people! But why should we make the US consumer suffer over something that a bunch of scumbags called R-calf are promoting!


That is what the US government is trying to get the Canadian govt. to do--- AARP is reporting that when GW and Martin met in Canada that is the deal they made-- If Canada shuts off all drugs to the US, then the US will take your beef, no questions asked...... "Sound science at work"...


OT. AARP is a another liberal lying get-in-your-face organization. I just had a 90+ year old gentleman tell me they fooled him for 30 years, and he told 'em to stick it! Maybe you have a few years to go before you discover the truth?


BullBurger are you saying that what AARP is reporting- a deal for a wideopen border for beef in exchange for Canada shutting down their drugs didn't happen?..... Fox news reported it first- Are they liberal liars too?

I'm aware of AARP's liberal ties- but they were quite extensive on this investigation... Included interviews with Canadian pharmacists that are resisting their governments actions ... Been trying to find it on the web so I could post it... Which ever way you look at this issue- AARP is not doing GW any good except with some of the ultra conservatives.....

Does make you wonder when a government expends more energy on cutting off cheap prescription drugs to its citizens then it does shutting down the flow of maryjane, coke and meth..... Confused




Last edited by Oldtimer on Sun Mar 13, 2005 12:12 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
Oldtimer
Rancher
Rancher


Joined: 10 Feb 2005
Posts: 24735
Location: Northeast Montana

PostPosted: Sun Mar 13, 2005 12:07 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

TimH wrote:
Oldtimer-"If Canadians can sell their beef for 1/2 price, I agree COOL won't make a difference.... "

You baffled me again OT !!!!! Are you saying that PRICE and not a "Born ,raised and slaughtered in USA" label will dictate which product a consumer will buy???? Shocked


Tim- I'm sure price will always play some role- Just depends on the difference--- with the drug issue its just like having two like products lying there- two identical steaks- one priced at $5 a pound, the other priced at $1 per pound....The drug price variance has gotten so big that for some it is either buy the cheaper Canadian drug or go without......


Back to top
~SH~
Rancher
Rancher


Joined: 14 Feb 2005
Posts: 5427
Location: South Western SD

PostPosted: Sun Mar 13, 2005 12:17 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hat: "..since we are now post BSE, have no export markets opened, and are in a massive trade defecit how would taking Canadian beef help the US cattlemen?"

The number one goal should be to normalize trade and gain back the trade surplus position we enjoyed in recent years so we can add value to the parts of the carcass that we cannot adequately market domestically.

R-CULTers pretend that our current markets are a result of no Canadian live cattle imports. Funny, none of them can explain why cattle prices continued to rally after Canadian boxed beef was allowed back in.

Cattle prices would be higher than they are now with normalized trade. Currently we are importing 50% of normal Canadian imports with no export markets. R-CULT is focused on imports, NCBA is focused on exports.

Our competition is not Canada, our competition is poultry and pork. If Beef prices get too high, consumers switch to poultry and pork making Canadian imports a moot point. R-CULT doesn't understand that.

We do not have a leg to stand on by telling our export markets that our beef is safe when we say that Canadian cattle are unsafe.

Why?

1. We have Canadian cattle within our system today.
2. We are currently importing boxed beef from Canada from cattle under thirty months of age.
3. SRM removal is occuring in both Canada and the U.S. and assures that beef is safe.
4. BSE prions are not detectable in animals under 20 months of age and very few under 30 months of age.
5. Canada and the U.S. feed bans are implemented
6. Canada and the U.S. have increased BSE surveilance.
7. Canada has a traceback system, we don't.

We cannot expect Japan to trust that our beef is safe when R-CULT is saying that Canadian live cattle are unsafe when we have Canadian cattle in our mix and we are imorting Canadian cattle in the form of boxed beef.

Where's the trade leverage in that hypocrisy?

The more you study R-CULT, the more you will realize how conflicting their arguments are.

South Korea said they would not take our beef if we were unwilling to take Canadian live cattle.

Our export markets are not buying into the contradicting R-CULT bullsh*t.


~SH~


Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Ranchers.net's Bull Session Forum Index -> Bull Session All times are GMT - 6 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3
Page 3 of 3

 




Powered by phpBB
Copyright © 2001-2011 Ranchers.net
All times are GMT - 6 Hours