|
| Author |
Message |
DiamondSCattleCo
Rancher
Joined: 12 Dec 2005
Posts: 1805
Location: NE Saskatchewan
|
 Posted: Thu Mar 09, 2006 1:21 am Post subject: |
 |
|
| Tam wrote: |
1: We use dentition now for the 30 month and under and Japan agreed on the tenderous test for the under twenty months. They may both be time consuming but both work and neither of them will put the integrity of our system into question like forcing producers to do something they don't want to just to satifiy you.
2: could you provide some proof from the Chinese that says they will only take our beef if it is age verified by birthdate. as I don't recall that I have heard that before.
3. I don't want this to sound mean but Why do people always leave it up to others to protect their interests. What kind of Market power does it take to pay a $100 membership and attend a few meeting so you can have you say on the issues we are all facing together. |
1) Time consuming, and not able to handle the volume thats required. And this has nothing to do with satisfying me. I'm not the only one who feels this way. I understand the Alberta government feels strongly enough that they may bypass producer wishes and make it mandatory in Alberta. The past president of the CCA told me that, and I haven't had an opportunity to verify it yet.
2) Tam, talk to some people in the industry. I'm sorry, marketing reps and people who meet with delegates don't post their conversation verbatim on the internet for people to read. No official resolutions have ever been passed by the Chinese if thats what you mean, or at least that I'm aware of, but only a blind man can't see that age verification is going to be a necessary component of exporting beef in the future.
3) The SSGA asks for $100 from its members. Whats that for? To protect them and stand up for their rights. I'm sure that at least SOME of the SSGA members are average producers who have found the same problem with access to age verified premiums as I have. I wasn't asking the SSGA to protect me, as I'm not a member. Perhaps none of the SSGA are average sized producers? And if there are, has anyone bothered to explain to them that not having sufficient quantities of age verified beef could very well hurt them in the future? Perhaps in the interests of full disclosure, someone in the SSGA should.
Rod
|
|
| Back to top |
|
blackjack
Member
Joined: 21 Feb 2005
Posts: 118
Location: west central Alberta
|
| Posted: Thu Mar 09, 2006 9:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
| ... tam ... rod is correct in saying the alberta govt wanted to make age verification mandatory ... the cattle assoc told ag minister horner to wait until the producers could adjust to yet another request of them... in saying that maybe it should have become mandatory cause there was a lack of cattle aged verified to process at the packers and still are... so that is one of the reasons there was no premium for the calves last fall...
|
|
| Back to top |
|
Tam
Rancher
Joined: 10 Feb 2005
Posts: 8023
Location: Sask
|
| Posted: Thu Mar 09, 2006 10:07 am Post subject: |
|
|
| DiamondSCattleCo wrote: |
| Tam wrote: |
1: We use dentition now for the 30 month and under and Japan agreed on the tenderous test for the under twenty months. They may both be time consuming but both work and neither of them will put the integrity of our system into question like forcing producers to do something they don't want to just to satifiy you.
2: could you provide some proof from the Chinese that says they will only take our beef if it is age verified by birthdate. as I don't recall that I have heard that before.
3. I don't want this to sound mean but Why do people always leave it up to others to protect their interests. What kind of Market power does it take to pay a $100 membership and attend a few meeting so you can have you say on the issues we are all facing together. |
1) Time consuming, and not able to handle the volume thats required. And this has nothing to do with satisfying me. I'm not the only one who feels this way. I understand the Alberta government feels strongly enough that they may bypass producer wishes and make it mandatory in Alberta. The past president of the CCA told me that, and I haven't had an opportunity to verify it yet.
2) Tam, talk to some people in the industry. I'm sorry, marketing reps and people who meet with delegates don't post their conversation verbatim on the internet for people to read. No official resolutions have ever been passed by the Chinese if thats what you mean, or at least that I'm aware of, but only a blind man can't see that age verification is going to be a necessary component of exporting beef in the future.
3) The SSGA asks for $100 from its members. Whats that for? To protect them and stand up for their rights. I'm sure that at least SOME of the SSGA members are average producers who have found the same problem with access to age verified premiums as I have. I wasn't asking the SSGA to protect me, as I'm not a member. Perhaps none of the SSGA are average sized producers? And if there are, has anyone bothered to explain to them that not having sufficient quantities of age verified beef could very well hurt them in the future? Perhaps in the interests of full disclosure, someone in the SSGA should.
Rod |
1.What required volume are you talking about Rod? and will our slaughter capacity handle the required volume? The problem with you argument about dentition time factor is that it is not the only factor when you look at the big picture. You have slaughter capacity and if we are to test for these markets like you seem to think we will then the time factor of the testing will play a bigger roll on our capacity than the time it takes for an inspector to look at the animals teeth.
2. "but only a blind man can't see that age verification is going to be a necessary component of exporting beef in the future" True but only a blind man can't see that we have other option that will not put the integity of the system we do have at risk. I agree age verification by birthdate is great but by forcing it on producers that don't want it, you are risky they will not have the records to back up the dates they were FORCED to file. If our trading partner see us fining producer for providing false un verifiable information will they trust the system to be what we say it is?
If China has not made any request for birthdate verification then Dentition should work on those cattle that come from producers that don't care to take advantage of the system that is provided to them free of charge.
By the way Rod first you say
| Quote: |
| If they all eat 1 hamburger/year, think about how much that would mean to the Canadian producer if we were the guys supplying that burger? |
and then you are telling OCM about the 5 star restaurants catering to high end crowd. I heard that the Chinese market could open to cull cow meat and that fits your hamburger story so the only factor I see there in the slaughter capacity factor as we don't need to age verify cull cattle only the under 30 and 20 month old animals.
3. first you say
| Quote: |
| Since you and BMR are in the SSGA, its up to you to protect the market for EVERYONE, especially the medium sized guy who doesn't even have the market power of the large producer. |
now it is
| Quote: |
| I wasn't asking the SSGA to protect me, as I'm not a member. |
do you not belong in the everyone catagory you mentioned? or the medium size producer who doesn't even have the market power of the large producer catagory?
Rod the SSGA doesn't pick and choose who the protect. They protect ALL PRODUCERS even those that don't pay membership dues. If you are so worried about what others, that are at these meetings, are being told why not become a member and come educate the rest of us on the real issues. I doubt you will because it is cheaper and eazier to sit back and complain than it is to get involved and have your say on how this industry works. Topics are discussed and voted on, not all issues go the way all would like but if you don't take advantage of your option to be a member and have a say you shouldn't complain about how other look after your business.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
DiamondSCattleCo
Rancher
Joined: 12 Dec 2005
Posts: 1805
Location: NE Saskatchewan
|
| Posted: Thu Mar 09, 2006 10:35 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Tam wrote: |
1) What required volume are you talking about Rod? and will our slaughter capacity handle the required volume? The problem with you argument about dentition time factor is that it is not the only factor when you look at the big picture.
2) "but only a blind man can't see that age verification is going to be a necessary component of exporting beef in the future" True but only a blind man can't see that we have other option that will not put the integity of the system we do have at risk.
3) I agree age verification by birthdate is great but by forcing it on producers that don't want it, you are risky they will not have the records to back up the dates they were FORCED to file. If our trading partner see us fining producer for providing false un verifiable information will they trust the system to be what we say it is?
4) If China has not made any request for birthdate verification then Dentition should work on those cattle that come from producers that don't care to take advantage of the system that is provided to them free of charge.
I heard that the Chinese market could open to cull cow meat and that fits your hamburger story so the only factor I see there in the slaughter capacity factor as we don't need to age verify cull cattle only the under 30 and 20 month old animals.
5) the real issues. I doubt you will because it is cheaper and eazier to sit back and complain than it is to get involved and have your say on how this industry works. |
1) If the Chinese market opens up, they'll be trying to rob some of the supply currently heading into the US, plus looking for live animal shipments. With a tighter supply, its going to drive prices up. Then either the US and local markets have to pony up to the table, or else go without. And this is GOOD FOR PRODUCERS. And your point about BSE testing is valid, however China is not asking for BSE testing on all animals. That will also come soon I'm sure, but Age Verification appears to be the forefront of it.
Even without the Chinese market open, the packers can't get enough age verified cattle for export. So it makes no sense to enact another, more expensive, time consuming process for age verification, just to protect the premiums of a few large producers.
2) There is ZERO risk to our current system. How is an incorrectly entered birthdate going to compromise the traceback system? And how is the current voluntary system any safer? People are every bit as likelt to enter incorrect data to get a premium as they would be to enter incorrect data when forced to enter data. And I like I said, the only way to ensure accuracy is by inspecting every single animal. Not going to happen and still maintain the volume that the market is going to ask for.
3) People see us handing out fines for speeding. Does this mean they don't trust our roads? Sorry, your logic doesn't work here.
4) Chinese delegates are telling marketers they will want age verified beef. Just because I haven't seen a resolution passed down, doesn't mean that its not there. They definitely won't lift the requirement for live animal shipments when they begin taking those. This is NOT guesswork or supposition on my part. These are real conversations taking place with real people, and if you actually spoke to some of the packers and marketers who are attempting to open the overseas market, you'd understand that.
5) And again, I grow weary of your insults. I have a sick wife at home and a 19 month old baby boy to look after. I do NOT have the time nor the money to travel to southern Saskatchewan and sit in on your SSGA meetings. So I do the next best thing I can do, and use the internet and telephone to contact those people who can speak for me. The CCA rep in Calgary suggested that I try to get an SSGA region started in this area, and I think its a heck of an idea. I'll be attempting that as well when time and energy permits. Perhaps maybe then we'll have a true voice from up here, as the SSGA certainly did NOT represent my area on the age verification issue.
So quite frankly, Tam, I see myself doing more than you are when it comes to protecting this industry. I'll happily debate your non-offensive points all day long, however accurate or inaccurate I feel they are. But can the insults or I'm simply going to start ignoring your responses. You have NO IDEA what I'm doing from my home right now to further producer interests.
Rod
Last edited by DiamondSCattleCo on Thu Mar 09, 2006 1:13 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
DiamondSCattleCo
Rancher
Joined: 12 Dec 2005
Posts: 1805
Location: NE Saskatchewan
|
| Posted: Thu Mar 09, 2006 1:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Tam wrote: |
| the way they see fit. I DON"T. I also don't see a need to force producers into something that is NOT A HEALTH ISSUE. M'AGE' is not a Health issue it is a marketing OPTION, and should not be forced on those that don't choose to comply. |
I missed this earlier. During the initial producer meetings with the CCIA, it repeatedly mentioned that M-ID was going to be a requirement to ensure EXPORT markets remained open. More than once, CCIA reps said that our trading partners were going to require traceback ability to ensure the safety of our beef. Certainly M-ID had a great local health impact as well, but the export component was always mentioned, and was near the top of the list. As it should be. Its pointless to have a healthy herd if you have no place to sell them. Remember, again, that 60% of our calves leave our borders.
M-Age is the IDENTICAL issue. There is absolutely no difference, except that it has less of a local impact. Its a food safety issue that affects our EXPORT markets. Again, whats the point in a healthy herd if we have no place to sell them?
Rod
|
|
| Back to top |
|
Tam
Rancher
Joined: 10 Feb 2005
Posts: 8023
Location: Sask
|
| Posted: Thu Mar 09, 2006 6:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: |
1) If the Chinese market opens up, they'll be trying to rob some of the supply currently heading into the US, plus looking for live animal shipments. With a tighter supply, its going to drive prices up. Then either the US and local markets have to pony up to the table, or else go without. And this is GOOD FOR PRODUCERS. And your point about BSE testing is valid, however China is not asking for BSE testing on all animals. That will also come soon I'm sure, but Age Verification appears to be the forefront of it.
Even without the Chinese market open, the packers can't get enough age verified cattle for export. So it makes no sense to enact another, more expensive, time consuming process for age verification, just to protect the premiums of a few large producers. |
Enact what we already have another process.
| Quote: |
| 2) There is ZERO risk to our current system. How is an incorrectly entered birthdate going to compromise the traceback system? And how is the current voluntary system any safer? People are every bit as likelt to enter incorrect data to get a premium as they would be to enter incorrect data when forced to enter data. And I like I said, the only way to ensure accuracy is by inspecting every single animal. Not going to happen and still maintain the volume that the market is going to ask for. |
The trace back system is not the system I.m talking about it is our voluntary Age verification system I’m talking about. You claim the only way to ensure the accuracy is by inspecting every animal. BUT we were personally audited by the CFIA to see if we had records to back up what we had entered so checking every animal is not the only way to find out if the information is WRONG. If the CFIA finds the producer records don’t verify the given date they flag the cattle. But if those cattle were to have already gone through the system and were exported our AGE VERIFICATION SYSTEM would come into question. And we would be going back to the expensive process of Dentition on ALL CATTLE.
And this is your opinion People are every bit as likelt to enter incorrect data to get a premium as they would be to enter incorrect data when forced to enter data most don’t happen to agree with you including the CCIA on this and that is why those that oppose making it manditory voted the way they did.
| Quote: |
| 3) People see us handing out fines for speeding. Does this mean they don't trust our roads? Sorry, your logic doesn't work here |
Did a person getting a speeding ticket in the US have anything to do with the Japanese closing the US down again? NO but sending them something they didn’t OK sure did. I don’t care if our export markets think our roads are safe but I do care that they trust we are sending them what we say we are.
| Quote: |
| 4) Haven't you read anything of what I posted? Chinese delegates are telling marketers they will want age verified beef. Just because I haven't seen a resolution passed down, doesn't mean that its not there. They definitely won't lift the requirement for live animal shipments when they begin taking those. This is NOT guesswork or supposition on my part. These are real conversations taking place with real people, and if you actually spoke to some of the packers and marketers who are attempting to open the overseas market, you'd understand that. |
If they are not telling the marketers they want age verify beef by BIRTHDATE then why can’t we use the other option open to us? You make it sound as if they will only take Age verified by BIRTHDATE
| Quote: |
| 5) And again, I grow weary of your insults. I have a sick wife at home and a 19 month old baby boy to look after. I do NOT have the time nor the money to travel to southern Saskatchewan and sit in on your SSGA meetings. So I do the next best thing I can do, and use the internet and telephone to contact those people who can speak for me. The CCA rep in Calgary suggested that I try to get an SSGA region started in this area, and I think its a heck of an idea. I'll be attempting that as well when time and energy permits. Perhaps maybe then we'll have a true voice from up here, as the SSGA certainly did NOT represent my area on the age verification issue. |
Sorry to hear about your wife I hope she feels better soon.
I agree with the CCA rep I think you should activate your zone but that would take becoming a MEMBER Rod. And if you choose to take that option I truly believe you will get the support of the full membership . And when and if you can attend a meeting whether it be in your local area or in Regina or the many other places we hold meetings you can have a say in how the SSGA handles all issues.including Age verification. But Please remember what I said about we vote and the vote doesn’t always go the way we would like so if your stand on Age is not backed by the MAJORITY it’s not going to be backed by the Association.
| Quote: |
| So quite frankly, Tam, I see myself doing more than you are when it comes to protecting this industry. I'll happily debate your non-offensive points all day long, however accurate or inaccurate I feel they are. But can the insults or I'm simply going to start ignoring your responses. You have NO IDEA what I'm doing from my home right now to further producer interests. |
I find it funny that you of all people would be telling anyone to can the insults go back and read this whole thread Rod you started it with an insult and you continued the insults all the way through including this post with Perhaps maybe then we'll have a true voice from up here, as the SSGA certainly did NOT represent my area on the age verification issue. You don't seem to mind tossing the old insults do you Rod. You need to can the insults and answer the questions asked of you.
By the way Are you prepared to provided the infrastructure that would be neccessary to implement Manditory Age vertification? what this means is are you going to provide ALL producer big and small, old and young internet access and in some cases train the producers how to use that computer so they can enter the information needed? All these demands that some producers want to put on our industry like M'AGE and 100% testing have to have a infrastructure that will support them and as of yet we are lacking the components neccessary to carry out either of these demands. So unless you are willing to provide it we can't implement it!!!!!!
|
|
| Back to top |
|
DiamondSCattleCo
Rancher
Joined: 12 Dec 2005
Posts: 1805
Location: NE Saskatchewan
|
| Posted: Thu Mar 09, 2006 7:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Tam wrote: |
1) If they are not telling the marketers they want age verify beef by BIRTHDATE then why can’t we use the other option open to us? You make it sound as if they will only take Age verified by BIRTHDATE
2) You don't seem to mind tossing the old insults do you Rod. You need to can the insults and answer the questions asked of you.
3) By the way Are you prepared to provided the infrastructure that would be neccessary to implement Manditory Age vertification? what this means is are you going to provide ALL producer big and small, old and young internet access and in some cases train the producers how to use that computer so they can enter the information needed? All these demands that some producers want to put on our industry like M'AGE and 100% testing have to have a infrastructure that will support them and as of yet we are lacking the components neccessary to carry out either of these demands. So unless you are willing to provide it we can't implement it!!!!!! |
1) Age verification by RFID is cheap, fast and easy. If the forecast number of livestock leaving for overseas markets is even remotely close to predictions, dentition checking will not be fast enough nor cheap enough.
2) I haven't insulted you. I said the SSGA, an association, was not looking out for producers in my area on the age verification issue. This is not an insult. It may an attack on the stance of an association that you have said represents ALL stockgrowers within Saskatchewan and I simply assured you that they were in no way, shape or form representing producers in my area. And as far as having voice in the SSGA up here, we DON'T have one. Whose the SSGA region rep for north-east Saskatchewan?
I have attacked your stance on certain issues and I have questioned your knowledge of certain parts of the cattle industry. You on the other hand have called me lazy, whiny, and unwilling to work to gain benefits within the current system. Madam, I am most certainly not lazy. If bringing to light a failure in the system is whining, then so be it. I guess good old George Washington and a thousand others who fought for change in a variety of systems were whiners too? And you are totally unaware of what I work on daily, only what I post here.
3) Age verification is not all done by internet access. Mail in age forms and telephone systems are all in place right now. All it would take is more manpower to handle it. Thats part of the 2 yr systems roll-out that I spoke of at the beginning of this thread. For all the livestock born in Saskatchewan, it would take all of 10 incompetent data entry clerks to make the necessary entries. At the most. And if the forms were designed properly, many fewer. A good data entry clerk can easily make 2000 birthdate entries in a day. With ease.
Rod
|
|
| Back to top |
|
greg
Rancher
Joined: 27 Jul 2005
Posts: 1066
Location: Alberta Canada
|
| Posted: Fri Mar 10, 2006 9:52 am Post subject: |
|
|
| In my humble opinion,it is a good idea.New times,but should be compensated for the extra work is only right
|
|
| Back to top |
|
Maple Leaf Angus
Rancher
Joined: 10 Feb 2005
Posts: 1823
Location: Southern Ontario
|
|
| Back to top |
|
DiamondSCattleCo
Rancher
Joined: 12 Dec 2005
Posts: 1805
Location: NE Saskatchewan
|
| Posted: Fri Mar 10, 2006 11:59 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Maple Leaf Angus wrote: |
| My reasoning is based on the historical perspective that shows that whenever an improvement has been been undertaken by the rancher or farmer, it is only the first guys in that benefit financially and eventually the market demands or accepts the "improvement" as the standard practice with prices returning to the previous level. Time and again, the things that we do to try to gain a little leverage in the marketplace simply end up providing a better product to the processer and consumer with no return to the primary producer. |
Maple Leaf, you are most certainly correct in this. Its just the way the marketplace works, and as beef producers we always have to be constantly looking for ways to improve. Unfortunately, it also means that eventually our improvments become the norm, but its also no different in the computer industry or other industries.
But this is why I feel we need to be enacting age verification right now. On the world stage right now, beef doesn't have to be age verified to be accepted by many countries. This is changing, and if Canada is the first to the market with ready volumes of age verified beef, then we will reap the benefits first. Then, when the prices start to slide down and age verified beef is the norm, we've already made the money.
Then we need to find another marketting tool.
Canada can't afford to be an "also ran" in the world market. We have way too much competition from other countries whose beef is, in my opinion, ALMOST as good. As I said, I think we have the best beef in the world, now we need to have the best marketting. If that means not protecting a select few's premiums, so be it.
Rod
|
|
| Back to top |
|
Tam
Rancher
Joined: 10 Feb 2005
Posts: 8023
Location: Sask
|
| Posted: Fri Mar 10, 2006 1:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| blackjack wrote: |
| ... tam ... rod is correct in saying the alberta govt wanted to make age verification mandatory ... the cattle assoc told ag minister horner to wait until the producers could adjust to yet another request of them... in saying that maybe it should have become mandatory cause there was a lack of cattle aged verified to process at the packers and still are... so that is one of the reasons there was no premium for the calves last fall... |
blackjack do you know how long it takes age vertified cattle to reach the packers? and do you know how many have been age verified since July 2005 that will be hitting the markets soon? Last fall saw low numbers because very few producers age verified their cattle the year before as they didn't really know what it took. As the knowledge grows so will the system we didn't tag every animal in Canada the first year when we implemented the ID program but as producers got on board those number rose and so will the Birthdate verified numbers just give it a chance. We went M"ID" because it was a health issue but the M'AGE is not a health issue and therefore most feel it should be left as a marketing option just like other marketing options.I hope you understand what I'm trying to get across. Sorry it took so long to reply to you but I was doing a bit more research on the topic.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
Tam
Rancher
Joined: 10 Feb 2005
Posts: 8023
Location: Sask
|
| Posted: Fri Mar 10, 2006 1:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: |
| 3) Age verification is not all done by internet access. Mail in age forms and telephone systems are all in place right now. All it would take is more manpower to handle it. Thats part of the 2 yr systems roll-out that I spoke of at the beginning of this thread. For all the livestock born in Saskatchewan, it would take all of 10 incompetent data entry clerks to make the necessary entries. At the most. And if the forms were designed properly, many fewer. A good data entry clerk can easily make 2000 birthdate entries in a day. With ease. |
In the interest of full disclosure would you like to explain this statement?
I have to be way for awhile this afternoon but I will check on your explanation as soon as I return.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
