Soapweed wrote:Big Muddy rancher wrote:Wouldn't it actually be the Pro wind movement that would be fanning flames?
Good point, BMR. It would take wind to fan a flame, and I am anti-wind so that is a false accusation.
Glad I could help

Anytime.



Soapweed wrote:Big Muddy rancher wrote:Wouldn't it actually be the Pro wind movement that would be fanning flames?
Good point, BMR. It would take wind to fan a flame, and I am anti-wind so that is a false accusation.
Big Muddy rancher wrote:Soapweed wrote:Big Muddy rancher wrote:Wouldn't it actually be the Pro wind movement that would be fanning flames?
Good point, BMR. It would take wind to fan a flame, and I am anti-wind so that is a false accusation.
Glad I could help![]()
Anytime.![]()
![]()
Big Muddy rancher wrote:Was that Mrs Justus?
Britt is living in Rockglen now, her boyfriend has a tire and repair shop.
She was busy driving a big Case IH Quad trac pulling a 1000bu grain cart. They are shut down with the rain.
sandhiller wrote:My concern with with the anti wind movement is setting a presedent of more control over what I can and cannot do on my land by people miles or hunderds of miles away.
Just because you don't want wind towers on your land shouldn't give you the right to say I can't have them. Disclamer, I am not near a wind farm, and I have no financial intrest in any wind farm.
Just because you don't want your ranch farmed or used for hunting or growing chickens or pigs or elk or fish or bulls or horses, should not allow someone miles away from doing such things on their private land.
Be very careful, you might actually get what you want and have it come back to bite you in the butt.
Amo wrote:sandhiller wrote:My concern with with the anti wind movement is setting a presedent of more control over what I can and cannot do on my land by people miles or hunderds of miles away.
Just because you don't want wind towers on your land shouldn't give you the right to say I can't have them. Disclamer, I am not near a wind farm, and I have no financial intrest in any wind farm.
Just because you don't want your ranch farmed or used for hunting or growing chickens or pigs or elk or fish or bulls or horses, should not allow someone miles away from doing such things on their private land.
Be very careful, you might actually get what you want and have it come back to bite you in the butt.
A public vote wouldn't be a bad idea either.
Mike wrote:Amo wrote:sandhiller wrote:My concern with with the anti wind movement is setting a presedent of more control over what I can and cannot do on my land by people miles or hunderds of miles away.
Just because you don't want wind towers on your land shouldn't give you the right to say I can't have them. Disclamer, I am not near a wind farm, and I have no financial intrest in any wind farm.
Just because you don't want your ranch farmed or used for hunting or growing chickens or pigs or elk or fish or bulls or horses, should not allow someone miles away from doing such things on their private land.
Be very careful, you might actually get what you want and have it come back to bite you in the butt.
A public vote wouldn't be a bad idea either.
In my opinion, a public vote on something like that is not democracy, it's mob rule.
Users browsing this forum: OWE MONEY and 11 guests