Ranchers.net Bull Session

Smaller Isn't Always Better

Things that come up in the daily operation of a ranch.
User avatar
Silver
Rancher
Rancher
Posts: 5060
Joined: Wed Mar 23, 2005 9:51 pm
Location: BC

Smaller Isn't Always Better

Postby Silver » Mon Jan 30, 2017 3:24 pm

GM88 Shared this on Facebook and I thought this was worth posting here. Seems like the mortality rates he mentions are awful high for any class of calves but not a big surprise as to which class of calves have the toughest time.


http://angus.media/News/Angus-Convention/547/Smaller-Isnt-Always-Better

User avatar
Big Muddy rancher
Rancher
Rancher
Posts: 21285
Joined: Thu Feb 10, 2005 6:29 pm
Location: Big Muddy valley
Contact:

Re: Smaller Isn't Always Better

Postby Big Muddy rancher » Mon Jan 30, 2017 3:31 pm

First of all, What the heck are you doing reading "Angus Media" lol

I was chasing light calves when I started out but have since made "Moderation in Excess" my motto.
Nothing extremely light and nothing extremely heavy. You need a cow/heifer big enough to do the job by her self while passing of a moderate birth wt. calf.
Avatar by Haymaker

I can't tame wild women.

But I can make tame women wild.

User avatar
Faster horses
Rancher
Rancher
Posts: 27776
Joined: Fri Feb 11, 2005 12:21 pm
Location: SE MT

Re: Smaller Isn't Always Better

Postby Faster horses » Mon Jan 30, 2017 3:59 pm

How small is too small and how big is too big? We love those small (75-80#)calves that can get up and run!!
"All the Democrats know how to do is lie and “forget.”--Trey Gowdy

User avatar
Big Muddy rancher
Rancher
Rancher
Posts: 21285
Joined: Thu Feb 10, 2005 6:29 pm
Location: Big Muddy valley
Contact:

Re: Smaller Isn't Always Better

Postby Big Muddy rancher » Mon Jan 30, 2017 4:28 pm

Faster horses wrote:How small is too small and how big is too big? We love those small (75-80#)calves that can get up and run!!



I think the article was referencing light calves 40 to 60 lb range. I agree 75 to 80lbs is a nice size for the range calving we do. I try not to buy bulls with a birth wt much over 85lbs. Considering most places selling bulls feed heavier than I do they should throw a bit lighter calves out of my cows.
Avatar by Haymaker



I can't tame wild women.



But I can make tame women wild.

User avatar
Silver
Rancher
Rancher
Posts: 5060
Joined: Wed Mar 23, 2005 9:51 pm
Location: BC

Re: Smaller Isn't Always Better

Postby Silver » Mon Jan 30, 2017 7:34 pm

Big Muddy rancher wrote:First of all, What the heck are you doing reading "Angus Media" lol


If Red Angus count as Angus I have my share. All things in moderation. :D

graybull
Member
Member
Posts: 108
Joined: Thu Mar 10, 2005 12:01 pm
Location: Wyo

Re: Smaller Isn't Always Better

Postby graybull » Mon Jan 30, 2017 8:49 pm

In my part of the world.........big dead calves don't sell well. Much better to have a live small calf.

User avatar
Big Muddy rancher
Rancher
Rancher
Posts: 21285
Joined: Thu Feb 10, 2005 6:29 pm
Location: Big Muddy valley
Contact:

Re: Smaller Isn't Always Better

Postby Big Muddy rancher » Mon Jan 30, 2017 9:25 pm

graybull wrote:In my part of the world.........big dead calves don't sell well. Much better to have a live small calf.


In the article that Silver posted they stated that small calves(40 to 60 lb) calves didn't do as well farther down the line.
So possibly the rancher selling those calves might do better the calves themselves have high death loss at weaning and in the feedlot.They also aren't as thrifty because they didn't get as much colostrum.
That's their theory.
Again the moderate sized caves that most of us strive for probably make us the most money.

A bunch of us are getting to old to mess around pulling big calves. I think it used to be a badge of honor to some that had cows with 6 C section scars. Showing off the dead 140 lb calf they pulled out. :?
Avatar by Haymaker



I can't tame wild women.



But I can make tame women wild.

User avatar
Faster horses
Rancher
Rancher
Posts: 27776
Joined: Fri Feb 11, 2005 12:21 pm
Location: SE MT

Re: Smaller Isn't Always Better

Postby Faster horses » Mon Jan 30, 2017 10:16 pm

Big dead calves don't pay any bills. Big live calves can be a lot of extra work if they don't get going like they should.

We know good people who use a terminal breed bull and they baby sit those cows as if they were first-calf heifers, checking them every 2 hours. That's WORK. The calves weigh a lot in the fall, tho, so as with anything, it comes down to choices.
"All the Democrats know how to do is lie and “forget.”--Trey Gowdy

User avatar
Shortgrass
Rancher
Rancher
Posts: 2343
Joined: Mon Sep 25, 2006 6:07 am
Location: Eastern Colorado

Re: Smaller Isn't Always Better

Postby Shortgrass » Mon Jan 30, 2017 10:40 pm

Live is always better. Smaller is not. 50 to 60 lbs is too little for me. Weaning time, big is better. Birthing time, big can be too big for anyone. I like 80 on heifers, 90 on cows, but my cows are too big for most. Usually I get by fine with 100 lbs, but I don't like them. I calf late March and April, and don't feed any more than smaller cows calving in February/March because wet cows use more feed than heavies. We all need to have a program figured out that we can make work for where we are and who we are.

WB
Member
Member
Posts: 426
Joined: Tue Mar 08, 2005 1:16 pm
Location: North Central S.D.

Re: Smaller Isn't Always Better

Postby WB » Tue Jan 31, 2017 6:59 am

All things considered, every operation is a little different but I do think most operations are birthing calves that are too small. Too big has dire consequences. I personally am happier with a bull calf in the 90 to 100 lb. range than one less than 80. Birth weights strongly follow cow families so if a cow has a giant birth wt. calf early in her life she likely will have another. Her daughters will follow suit.

User avatar
Mike
Rancher
Rancher
Posts: 28459
Joined: Thu Feb 10, 2005 4:05 pm
Location: Montgomery, Al

Re: Smaller Isn't Always Better

Postby Mike » Tue Jan 31, 2017 9:48 am

They have completely left out "Pelvic Size" out of the equation. That, to me, is the deciding factor between hard & easy calving cows, moreso than calf weight.

I take a good hard look and feel of the pelvic size of heifers when preg checking the first time. If they have extremely small pelvis' and are open, they take a ride. If they have extremely small openings and are bred, they get put on a watch list when calving. I can usually determine & predict which ones may have calving problems.
I'd rather have a bottle in front of me than a frontal lobotomy.

User avatar
Faster horses
Rancher
Rancher
Posts: 27776
Joined: Fri Feb 11, 2005 12:21 pm
Location: SE MT

Re: Smaller Isn't Always Better

Postby Faster horses » Tue Jan 31, 2017 10:03 am

On the subject of selecting for birthweight, a very knowledgeable Angus breeder (not part of the Montana Angus Mafia :wink: ) taught me how to select for suitable bw for heifer bulls. You have to look through the pedigree of the cow as bw is highly heritable from the cow, more than from the bull. It amazes me how some of these bull producers will tout a bull as being good for heifers and you look back through the maternal pedigree and see GDAR Rito 2100, for instance. The same with the bull. YOU CANNOT GO STRICTLY BY THE BW OF THE SIRE. That gets a lot of people in trouble. You must look through the pedigree. I learned that and it served us very well. So glad he took the time to enlighten me.
"All the Democrats know how to do is lie and “forget.”--Trey Gowdy


Return to “Ranch Talk”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 5 guests