In Judge Kornmann's opinion in the 11th District Court of Herman Schumacher, Michael P. Callicrate, and Roger D. Koch vs. Tyson Fresh Meats, Incl, et al, the reasoning used in the London Case that was summarily dismissed.
Under the ruling, there is no requirement to provide "proof of harm" to competition. This directly contradicts the ruling in Pickett case as well as the London case.
It seems Kornmann didn't follow the same logic as the 11th circuit, Agman. The judgement was not summarily dismissed by the court as Judge Strom did in the Pickett case.
At least one federal judge knows the difference between "or" and "and" in the law. Maybe the judges in the 11th circuit need a little more education in the English language.
Pickett got shafted because of a corrupt judicial system in the 11th circuit. If you have no integrity in the executive branch, the judicial branch, and not enough in the legislative branch, the system is broke. It needs to be fixed.
When is NCBA going to call for Congressional Hearings on these matters?
Of course we know they never will, because they want to protect the packers over producers.