• If you are having problems logging in please use the Contact Us in the lower right hand corner of the forum page for assistance.

2 more SCOTUS decisions today

iwannabeacowboy

Well-known member
hypocritexposer said:
Hobby Lobby won and unions cannot charge dues to those that do not want to be members...

Gonna take a crack at what old I was more conservative than anyone, so that justifies my bending over for my messiah will say:

"That's not true. I just read my demwits daily and they said zero will presidentially review the judicial ruling and they expect things will likely go his way.

Plus I've spent quite a bit of time talking to queers, and coloreds you know."
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
I am a bit surprised on the union one- but definitely not disappointed... Their ruling is exactly the stance I've had on all unions forever... Back when I was on the School Board I felt the wrath of the teachers union when I opposed allowing them to go union shop and force a few long term teachers to join the union... I took the same stance when the Sheriff's Deputies went union...
While I support the right and the need for unions to exist- I don't support forcing anyone to join...

As far as the birth control issue in some ways this could be called a win for separation of church and state - altho as I read the ruling the Justices left it open for government/taxpayers to pick up the gap created by those companies that declare religious exemption and they would then still have to furnish the coverage... Just that they could not be forced to pay for that part of the insurance...

Sort of disappointed because I prefer to see taxpayers and companies support/pay for furnishing birth control and day after pills rather than paying for abortions a few months down the line...
 

W.T

Well-known member
Oldtimer said:
I am a bit surprised on the union one- but definitely not disappointed... Their ruling is exactly the stance I've had on all unions forever... Back when I was on the School Board I felt the wrath of the teachers union when I opposed allowing them to go union shop and force a few long term teachers to join the union... I took the same stance when the Sheriff's Deputies went union...
While I support the right and the need for unions to exist- I don't support forcing anyone to join...

As far as the birth control issue in some ways this could be called a win for separation of church and state - altho as I read the ruling the Justices left it open for government/taxpayers to pick up the gap created by those companies that declare religious exemption and they would then still have to furnish the coverage... Just that they could not be forced to pay for that part of the insurance...

Sort of disappointed because I prefer to see taxpayers and companies support/pay for furnishing birth control and day after pills rather than paying for abortions a few months down the line...

YFKR............ If you don't want to create a child. DONT SCREW OT it really is that simple...And to expect America to keep paying for individual mistakes has got to quit. Your and I are accountable for our own actions, and everyone else should be as well. As far as abortions go that is between a Woman and her god and is no one else's business....
 

backhoeboogie

Well-known member
There is the lady in Arkansas who had nine abortions!

OT, Please explain to this rightwingernut why she does not get some type of birth control.
 

TexasBred

Well-known member
Oldtimer said:
I am a bit surprised on the union one- but definitely not disappointed... Their ruling is exactly the stance I've had on all unions forever... Back when I was on the School Board I felt the wrath of the teachers union when I opposed allowing them to go union shop and force a few long term teachers to join the union... I took the same stance when the Sheriff's Deputies went union...
While I support the right and the need for unions to exist- I don't support forcing anyone to join...

As far as the birth control issue in some ways this could be called a win for separation of church and state - altho as I read the ruling the Justices left it open for government/taxpayers to pick up the gap created by those companies that declare religious exemption and they would then still have to furnish the coverage... Just that they could not be forced to pay for that part of the insurance...

Sort of disappointed because I prefer to see taxpayers and companies support/pay for furnishing birth control and day after pills rather than paying for abortions a few months down the line...

It has little to do with birth control and everything to do with religious freedom. :wink:
 

Mike

Well-known member
TexasBred said:
Oldtimer said:
I am a bit surprised on the union one- but definitely not disappointed... Their ruling is exactly the stance I've had on all unions forever... Back when I was on the School Board I felt the wrath of the teachers union when I opposed allowing them to go union shop and force a few long term teachers to join the union... I took the same stance when the Sheriff's Deputies went union...
While I support the right and the need for unions to exist- I don't support forcing anyone to join...

As far as the birth control issue in some ways this could be called a win for separation of church and state - altho as I read the ruling the Justices left it open for government/taxpayers to pick up the gap created by those companies that declare religious exemption and they would then still have to furnish the coverage... Just that they could not be forced to pay for that part of the insurance...

Sort of disappointed because I prefer to see taxpayers and companies support/pay for furnishing birth control and day after pills rather than paying for abortions a few months down the line...

It has little to do with birth control and everything to do with religious freedom. :wink:

That, plus "Corporations" are "people". (Separate entities)
 

TexasBred

Well-known member
backhoeboogie said:
There is the lady in Arkansas who had nine abortions!

OT, Please explain to this rightwingernut why she does not get some type of birth control.

Maybe she should go to Planned Parenthood for pre-sex birth control pills instead of being promiscuous for 30 days and thinking the baby daddy gonna take care of her then end up at Planned Parenthood for an abortion. BTW PP gives bonus and awards to employees for performing more abortions this year than last year.
 

TexasBred

Well-known member
Oldtimer said:
I am a bit surprised on the union one- but definitely not disappointed... Their ruling is exactly the stance I've had on all unions forever... Back when I was on the School Board I felt the wrath of the teachers union when I opposed allowing them to go union shop and force a few long term teachers to join the union... I took the same stance when the Sheriff's Deputies went union...
While I support the right and the need for unions to exist- I don't support forcing anyone to join...

As far as the birth control issue in some ways this could be called a win for separation of church and state - altho as I read the ruling the Justices left it open for government/taxpayers to pick up the gap created by those companies that declare religious exemption and they would then still have to furnish the coverage... Just that they could not be forced to pay for that part of the insurance...

Sort of disappointed because I prefer to see taxpayers and companies support/pay for furnishing birth control and day after pills rather than paying for abortions a few months down the line...

Would that fall under "preventive medicine"?? The only pills Hobby Lobby objected to were those that definitely caused abortions after conception rather than being true birth control pills preventing conception.
 

loomixguy

Well-known member
A 30 day supply of birth control pills costs NINE BUCKS at Wal Mart. WTF should any employer or insurance company have to pay for it??
 

hopalong

Well-known member
Oldtimer said:
I am a bit surprised on the union one- but definitely not disappointed... Their ruling is exactly the stance I've had on all unions forever... Back when I was on the School Board I felt the wrath of the teachers union when I opposed allowing them to go union shop and force a few long term teachers to join the union... I took the same stance when the Sheriff's Deputies went union...
While I support the right and the need for unions to exist- I don't support forcing anyone to join...

As far as the birth control issue in some ways this could be called a win for separation of church and state - altho as I read the ruling the Justices left it open for government/taxpayers to pick up the gap created by those companies that declare religious exemption and they would then still have to furnish the coverage... Just that they could not be forced to pay for that part of the insurance...

Sort of disappointed because I prefer to see taxpayers and companies support/pay for furnishing birth control and day after pills rather than paying for abortions a few months down the line...


I,I,I,I,I, insecure as all get out oldtmer!!!!!! If you were as GREAT as you think you are you would be worth something,,, but you are not!! No respect in any of the forums I know you in,,,, laughing stock
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
The best FB post I saw the other day (not even Borowitz)- when they were discussing if it was men that got pregnant and had babies :

If birth control were for men - they'd sell it at Starbucks in flavors like Cool Ranch and BBQ..
 

hypocritexposer

Well-known member
Oldtimer said:
The best FB post I saw the other day (not even Borowitz)- when they were discussing if it was men that got pregnant and had babies :

If birth control were for men - they'd sell it at Starbucks in flavors like Cool Ranch and BBQ..


Some 204 outfits favored by Democrats were granted waivers by the president from ObamaCare, which means their employees do not have the right to employer provided birth control. These include upscale restaurant, nightclubs, and hotels in then-Speaker Pelosi’s district; labor union chapters; large corporations, financial firms, and local governments.

http://www.americanthinker.com/2014/07/lets_build_a_stairway_to_alberta.html
 

Mike

Well-known member
hypocritexposer said:
Oldtimer said:
The best FB post I saw the other day (not even Borowitz)- when they were discussing if it was men that got pregnant and had babies :

If birth control were for men - they'd sell it at Starbucks in flavors like Cool Ranch and BBQ..


Some 204 outfits favored by Democrats were granted waivers by the president from ObamaCare, which means their employees do not have the right to employer provided birth control. These include upscale restaurant, nightclubs, and hotels in then-Speaker Pelosi’s district; labor union chapters; large corporations, financial firms, and local governments.

http://www.americanthinker.com/2014/07/lets_build_a_stairway_to_alberta.html

Another lie by Buckwheat? What's new? :roll: :roll: :roll:

He'll be caught up with OT before you know it!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! :lol:
 
Top