• If you are having problems logging in please use the Contact Us in the lower right hand corner of the forum page for assistance.

46 Years Later Mass Media Admits JFK Killed by Conspiracy

A

Anonymous

Guest
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KlsqSBslX3g&feature=player_embedded#!

Most morons will be about 37 years older than today when mass media says that 9/11 was done by a small group of people in the government with assistance of Mossad using Military Grade Nano Thermate.
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
Steve,

no comment? your wonderful government murdered JFK admitted here by one more FBI agent and you say nothing....go and murder some more innocent muslim children and make us all safer....great job... :clap:
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
Any of you brain dead fools want to comment on this FBI agents revelations?
 

hypocritexposer

Well-known member
shaumei said:
Any of you brain dead fools want to comment on this FBI agents revelations?

duh, what did cha say

If I could get this helmet unglued from my head, I might hear ya better.

Nap Hill wrote a great book awhile back, you should read it.
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
as always, you both cannot comment on the evidence as you are just stupid, braindead or scared...which one is it? maybe all three..
 

hopalong

Well-known member
As always you cannot make any comment without name calling. alligator mouth humming bird butt,, gnat brain, and those are your better points!


Go away you stink up the room with yout nonsense.
 

hypocritexposer

Well-known member
shaumei said:
as always, you both cannot comment on the evidence as you are just stupid, braindead or scared...which one is it? maybe all three..

You have no idea what I think of the "evidence". I refuse to converse in an intelligent manner with you, because you came onto the site and disrespected all of us, from the get go.

You continue to call people names and assume what we think.

Go to the library and check out Nap Hill's book. Maybe try again when you have read it.
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
Once again, not one of you attempted to attack the information. Just attack me.

Yes, I think most of you are idiots. You do not have to go thru your entire lives though as braindead idiots.

Turn off your TV's and do not believe what you read and here on the radio.

You guys are just too gullible. Have forgotten how to think on your own.

Debate me. Try it. It make help wake up your brains.
 

hypocritexposer

Well-known member
shaumei said:
Once again, not one of you attempted to attack the information. Just attack me.

Yes, I think most of you are idiots. You do not have to go thru your entire lives though as braindead idiots.

Turn off your TV's and do not believe what you read and here on the radio.

You guys are just too gullible. Have forgotten how to think on your own.

Debate me. Try it. It make help wake up your brains.

Yes, we attacked you first. We had it all planned out amongst ourselves. We had a meeting 3 months before you arrived and decided that when shaumei arrived, we were going to call him names and stuff. :lol:
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
hypocritexposer said:
shaumei said:
Once again, not one of you attempted to attack the information. Just attack me.

Yes, I think most of you are idiots. You do not have to go thru your entire lives though as braindead idiots.

Turn off your TV's and do not believe what you read and here on the radio.

You guys are just too gullible. Have forgotten how to think on your own.

Debate me. Try it. It make help wake up your brains.

Yes, we attacked you first. We had it all planned out amongst ourselves. We had a meeting 3 months before you arrived and decided that when shaumei arrived, we were going to call him names and stuff. :lol:

Hypocrite,

turn off your tv and stop drinking fluoride water.
 

Twister Frost

Well-known member
shaumei said:
Any of you brain dead fools want to comment on this FBI agents revelations?

Here is the problem that I have with you in particular, Shaumei. You try to use Wikipedia and youtube as examples of knowledgeable sources. In your JFK thread, you use the words “mass media” and there are no stories being covered by the media outlets of today confirming---nor refuting---said information.
But, you keep bringing your theories forward, and maybe when you have something that is debatable, based on something more than a personal belief, you just may find someone on here who is willing to join in with you. That could be highly doubtful because of the way you treated some individually and blanketed the rest as ‘morons’ because they did not jump on the Shaumei bandwagon.
I, for one, really do not care to hear Enquirer-like stories about President Bush—not because he is my hero (he wasn’t)---but because I am a realist---even if that information is provable, how does it change what is happening today? Because you believe it is so, does that make the mortgage crisis, the wars on two fronts, the health care flop, etc., etc., lesser problems? I live in the present and when information comes out that deals with the present, I tend to have thoughts and feelings about them-because they affect future situations . I would be saying the same thing if you had just discovered the Clinton-Lewinsky scandal---who cares? Problem is, that scandal came to light while President Clinton was still in office and it made it easy to use as a reason why things were going down the tube for Clinton---right or wrong, that is how I look at things.
As for history, there are many events in our history that are there for reference points in the future. Many are not there just to make sure we do not make the same mistake, but to make sure that we remember and respect the sacrifices that allow us today. For you to try and tarnish some of them, I can say that is your right; but the more you try to convince me through badgering and name-calling, the less likely I am to ever give you a break in believability.
You are too far out there on the “fringe” for me, and I think that if you are gathering all of your information “sans the norm”—you are missing out on the truth. There are two sides to every story---the truth usually involves information from both sides. Quite honestly, I do not think it will be very long and you will show up as banned on the list of members---you seem to be targeting a few and you are "upping the ante" in the "How brazen and abnoxious can I type" department.
Hope this answers the above quoted question...(My personal belief is that the FBI agent has lost a boat load in his stocks and retirement and thinks this little scandal can make up the difference---I'll look to see if there is anything on youtube and wikipedia to back up my thoughts :lol:
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
Twister Frost,

so you think the FBI agent is a liar even though he gives details upon details that you just discount wholesale as it does not fit your image of this country.

Most of the people on this site believe Bush as a God. He is a liar that committed treason while in office. So did Clinton and so did Bush Sr. and now Obama.

Any info I put out there you will discount it. You only believe your tv set. That is all from corporate media that brainwashes you.

My info I have presented is bulletproof. No one here has been able to disprove any of it.

So, WTC Building 7 collapsing at freefall speed is somehow Enquirer news for you too?

the fact that we have a FBI agent saying our former President was murdered by a govt conspiracy does not bother you or make you think maybe there is something to this and to 9/11?

or

Are you just too far gone mentally to ever accept these ideas as possibilities when evidence leads there?
 

Twister Frost

Well-known member
For that one FBI agent who can provide details for your side, there are ten FBI agents that refute him---are you too far gone to do statistical probability?
All of my information does not come from a TV set---I tend to read a lot---and I am sure you are going to be able to find a video or wiki site that will say the book publishers are brainwashing me or they are Jewish or whatever your argument will be--I'm prepared for it.
As I said--your thinking is too fringe for me and there is not one thing you can do or say at this point that will change my mind---thus, I am done bantering with you because this is not debating any topic. You are not willing to debate anything---you are seeking glorification and I'll fill you in now---ranchers don't glorify anything! You will have to find your band of believers somewhere else---pretty apparent they are not here!
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
Twister Frost said:
For that one FBI agent who can provide details for your side, there are ten FBI agents that refute him---are you too far gone to do statistical probability?
All of my information does not come from a TV set---I tend to read a lot---and I am sure you are going to be able to find a video or wiki site that will say the book publishers are brainwashing me or they are Jewish or whatever your argument will be--I'm prepared for it.
As I said--your thinking is too fringe for me and there is not one thing you can do or say at this point that will change my mind---thus, I am done bantering with you because this is not debating any topic. You are not willing to debate anything---you are seeking glorification and I'll fill you in now---ranchers don't glorify anything! You will have to find your band of believers somewhere else---pretty apparent they are not here!

I use Youtube as evidence. it is there on that site if you want to see it. Oklahoma City bombing had bombs inside the Murrah building that went off. they had to defuse two others inside the building that housed the irs and atf..how did the bombs get inside the building?
 

Twister Frost

Well-known member
Well, there seems to be many people who want to believe that there was a cover-up of the OKC bombing! Found this forum and in one area a man mentions that they were picking up debris from the ATF, which had an office in the building and various teaching bombs----maybe that is where the other two 'bombs' come from. But, this is the best respose on the site attributed to a man named Longfellow---the conspiracy tests are actually hyperlinks, so I will include the address: http://forums.randi.org/showthread.php?t=155274
My all-time favorite is bolded by me, because it so explains you, Shaumei.

At How Stuff Works they have portions of a show that aired on the Discovery Channel concerning the Murrah building bombing. The show dealt with most aspects of the event, including those raised here, and, in my opinion, quite handily refuted all of the conspiracy theories surrounding that day.

Conspiracy Test: More Than One Bomb.
Conspiracy Test: The Columns of the Murrah Building.
Conspiracy Test: Oklahoma Bombing Damage.

It was rather telling to watch General Parton basically hand-wave aside the data collected which directly refuted his beliefs. This is the exact same thing that members of the '9/11 truth movement' do: I reject your reality and substitute my own.
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
Twister Frost said:
Well, there seems to be many people who want to believe that there was a cover-up of the OKC bombing! Found this forum and in one area a man mentions that they were picking up debris from the ATF, which had an office in the building and various teaching bombs----maybe that is where the other two 'bombs' come from. But, this is the best respose on the site attributed to a man named Longfellow---the conspiracy tests are actually hyperlinks, so I will include the address: http://forums.randi.org/showthread.php?t=155274
My all-time favorite is bolded by me, because it so explains you, Shaumei.

At How Stuff Works they have portions of a show that aired on the Discovery Channel concerning the Murrah building bombing. The show dealt with most aspects of the event, including those raised here, and, in my opinion, quite handily refuted all of the conspiracy theories surrounding that day.

Conspiracy Test: More Than One Bomb.
Conspiracy Test: The Columns of the Murrah Building.
Conspiracy Test: Oklahoma Bombing Damage.

It was rather telling to watch General Parton basically hand-wave aside the data collected which directly refuted his beliefs. This is the exact same thing that members of the '9/11 truth movement' do: I reject your reality and substitute my own.

so mass media took care of the fact that no one from the govt could have been involved even though bombs did go off in the murrah building and two had to be defused?

the question is were there bombs inside murrah building. the answer is yes. do you deny that?
 

Twister Frost

Well-known member
shaumei said:
so mass media took care of the fact that no one from the govt could have been involved even though bombs did go off in the murrah building and two had to be defused?

the question is were there bombs inside murrah building. the answer is yes. do you deny that?

I am pretty sure that is what I just did---I not only denied it, but my evidence refutes it, General Parton. Bring on the pictures of the bombs being defused...bring on the court transcripts...bring on how it was not McVeigh and Nichols, but John Doe #1 and John Doe #2---what about all the men in black ties hanging black plastic-----bring on the whole cover up because I have figured out your strategy, General Parton.

By the way, did you watch the videos????
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
Twister Frost said:
shaumei said:
so mass media took care of the fact that no one from the govt could have been involved even though bombs did go off in the murrah building and two had to be defused?

the question is were there bombs inside murrah building. the answer is yes. do you deny that?

I am pretty sure that is what I just did---I not only denied it, but my evidence refutes it, General Parton. Bring on the pictures of the bombs being defused...bring on the court transcripts...bring on how it was not McVeigh and Nichols, but John Doe #1 and John Doe #2---what about all the men in black ties hanging black plastic-----bring on the whole cover up because I have figured out your strategy, General Parton.

By the way, did you watch the videos????

here is the proof there were bombs inside the building....multiple witnesses as well...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NWwrEEP8EBk
 
Top