shaumei said:
Any of you brain dead fools want to comment on this FBI agents revelations?
Here is the problem that I have with you in particular, Shaumei. You try to use Wikipedia and youtube as examples of knowledgeable sources. In your JFK thread, you use the words “mass media” and there are no stories being covered by the media outlets of today confirming---nor refuting---said information.
But, you keep bringing your theories forward, and maybe when you have something that is debatable, based on something more than a personal belief, you just may find someone on here who is willing to join in with you. That could be highly doubtful because of the way you treated some individually and blanketed the rest as ‘morons’ because they did not jump on the Shaumei bandwagon.
I, for one, really do not care to hear Enquirer-like stories about President Bush—not because he is my hero (he wasn’t)---but because I am a realist---even if that information is provable, how does it change what is happening today? Because you believe it is so, does that make the mortgage crisis, the wars on two fronts, the health care flop, etc., etc., lesser problems? I live in the present and when information comes out that deals with the present, I tend to have thoughts and feelings about them-because they affect future situations . I would be saying the same thing if you had just discovered the Clinton-Lewinsky scandal---who cares? Problem is, that scandal came to light while President Clinton was still in office and it made it easy to use as a reason why things were going down the tube for Clinton---right or wrong, that is how I look at things.
As for history, there are many events in our history that are there for reference points in the future. Many are not there just to make sure we do not make the same mistake, but to make sure that we remember and respect the sacrifices that allow us today. For you to try and tarnish some of them, I can say that is your right; but the more you try to convince me through badgering and name-calling, the less likely I am to ever give you a break in believability.
You are too far out there on the “fringe” for me, and I think that if you are gathering all of your information “sans the norm”—you are missing out on the truth. There are two sides to every story---the truth usually involves information from both sides. Quite honestly, I do not think it will be very long and you will show up as banned on the list of members---you seem to be targeting a few and you are "upping the ante" in the "How brazen and abnoxious can I type" department.
Hope this answers the above quoted question...(My personal belief is that the FBI agent has lost a boat load in his stocks and retirement and thinks this little scandal can make up the difference---I'll look to see if there is anything on youtube and wikipedia to back up my thoughts :lol: