• If you are having problems logging in please use the Contact Us in the lower right hand corner of the forum page for assistance.

83%

aplusmnt

Well-known member
I am baffled, with 83% rating their health coverage as Good to Excellent, why does the liberals say there is a crisis?

Has anyone ever seen anything besides blacks voting for Obama that was higher than 83%?

Seems like the headlines should read, U.S. Health care big success 83% happy with it!
 

RobertMac

Well-known member
aplusmnt said:
I am baffled, with 83% rating their health coverage as Good to Excellent, why does the liberals say there is a crisis?

Has anyone ever seen anything besides blacks voting for Obama that was higher than 83%?

Seems like the headlines should read, U.S. Health care big success 83% happy with it!
It's really simple...this isn't about health care, it is about redistribution of wealth (also known as socialism) because the real causes of increased healthcare cost are not being addressed!
 

Mike

Well-known member
Seems like the headlines should read, U.S. Health care big success 83% happy with it!

It's part of the Alinsky plan, which Buckwheat has embraced, to make the masses depndent on gov't.

Not unlike the bears feeding at trash cans in the park. Once they become accustomed to eating there, they expect it and will attack you when you try to wean them off the free vittles.

Why do the Liberals not see it coming? :roll:
 

RobertMac

Well-known member
Mike said:
Seems like the headlines should read, U.S. Health care big success 83% happy with it!

It's part of the Alinsky plan, which Buckwheat has embraced, to make the masses depndent on gov't.

Not unlike the bears feeding at trash cans in the park. Once they become accustomed to eating there, they expect it and will attack you when you try to wean them off the free vittles.

Why do the Liberals not see it coming? :roll:
I think he more than "embraces" the Alinsky plan...he has help prefect it will in ACORN!!!!!
 

Sandhusker

Well-known member
RobertMac said:
aplusmnt said:
I am baffled, with 83% rating their health coverage as Good to Excellent, why does the liberals say there is a crisis?

Has anyone ever seen anything besides blacks voting for Obama that was higher than 83%?

Seems like the headlines should read, U.S. Health care big success 83% happy with it!
It's really simple...this isn't about health care, it is about redistribution of wealth (also known as socialism) because the real causes of increased healthcare cost are not being addressed!

Well said, RM.
 

backhoeboogie

Well-known member
This could consume our legislators' time for much longer than it already has. I remember when Bill and Hillary wasted so much on this same issue.
 

Bullhauler

Well-known member
aplusmnt said:
I am baffled, with 83% rating their health coverage as Good to Excellent, why does the liberals say there is a crisis?

Has anyone ever seen anything besides blacks voting for Obama that was higher than 83%?

Seems like the headlines should read, U.S. Health care big success 83% happy with it!

I guess If you were one of the ones whose insurance premiums went to over $1200 a month and you couldn't change policies due to a pre-existing condition you would be singing a different tune. But until then you will continue to sound like the selfish self-centered individual that you are.
 

Tam

Well-known member
Bullhauler said:
aplusmnt said:
I am baffled, with 83% rating their health coverage as Good to Excellent, why does the liberals say there is a crisis?

Has anyone ever seen anything besides blacks voting for Obama that was higher than 83%?

Seems like the headlines should read, U.S. Health care big success 83% happy with it!

I guess If you were one of the ones whose insurance premiums went to over $1200 a month and you couldn't change policies due to a pre-existing condition you would be singing a different tune. But until then you will continue to sound like the selfish self-centered individual that you are.
That must be why part of the other 17% support this plan but why not fix that part and stop trying to control the whole damn system. that 83% like. I'd bet the rest of the 17% are ILLEGALS that want a free ride and the dems wants votes from. :roll:
 

aplusmnt

Well-known member
Bullhauler said:
aplusmnt said:
I am baffled, with 83% rating their health coverage as Good to Excellent, why does the liberals say there is a crisis?

Has anyone ever seen anything besides blacks voting for Obama that was higher than 83%?

Seems like the headlines should read, U.S. Health care big success 83% happy with it!

I guess If you were one of the ones whose insurance premiums went to over $1200 a month and you couldn't change policies due to a pre-existing condition you would be singing a different tune. But until then you will continue to sound like the selfish self-centered individual that you are.

I went a lot of years with out insurance and never once did I complain about it. When I grew up and matured and I then got responsible and went out and took care of my problem.

I have no problem with helping those that have Insurance problems, but leave the 83% alone. In the end it would be cheaper and hurt less people to just open up the Medicaid requirements some and take in more people, those that have pre existing conditions or can not afford Insurance.

Problem solved! Just lower the requirements for Medicaid, Tort reform and allow anyone that wants to to buy into the already existing government policy, and do do away with State boundaries and life is good!

But liberals do not want to solve the problem they want to gain control!
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
aplusmnt said:
Bullhauler said:
aplusmnt said:
I am baffled, with 83% rating their health coverage as Good to Excellent, why does the liberals say there is a crisis?

Has anyone ever seen anything besides blacks voting for Obama that was higher than 83%?

Seems like the headlines should read, U.S. Health care big success 83% happy with it!

I guess If you were one of the ones whose insurance premiums went to over $1200 a month and you couldn't change policies due to a pre-existing condition you would be singing a different tune. But until then you will continue to sound like the selfish self-centered individual that you are.

I went a lot of years with out insurance and never once did I complain about it. When I grew up and matured and I then got responsible and went out and took care of my problem.

I have no problem with helping those that have Insurance problems, but leave the 83% alone. In the end it would be cheaper and hurt less people to just open up the Medicaid requirements some and take in more people, those that have pre existing conditions or can not afford Insurance.

Problem solved! Just lower the requirements for Medicaid, Tort reform and allow anyone that wants to to buy into the already existing government policy, and do do away with State boundaries and life is good!

But liberals do not want to solve the problem they want to gain control!

That actually was discussed-and was in Obama's original plan-but Republicans screamed about it as being a move toward more socialized medicine...The reason they decided to offer a public insurance "option" instead for those folks- and to give the insurance monopoly some competition....

Interestingly its sounding more and more like the Republicans working on the bipartisan bill are backing the insurance companies plan- mandating everyone to have insurance (government subsidies pay for those that can't pay- or under a certain income rate)- and requiring the insurance companies to insure ALL- and not be able to refuse anyone or drop anyone....

A WIN-WIN for the insurance companies as they get many more folks paying in (or the government/taxpayer paying in for those that can't)- and it still leaves them free run to set whatever profit margin they want- and keep raising rates to meet that profit margin....
 

aplusmnt

Well-known member
If a Republican disagreed with my suggestion then I disagree with them. I don't care if they are Republican or Democrat just fix what is wrong and leave the rest alone!
 

aplusmnt

Well-known member
Oldtimer said:
aplusmnt said:
Bullhauler said:
I guess If you were one of the ones whose insurance premiums went to over $1200 a month and you couldn't change policies due to a pre-existing condition you would be singing a different tune. But until then you will continue to sound like the selfish self-centered individual that you are.

I went a lot of years with out insurance and never once did I complain about it. When I grew up and matured and I then got responsible and went out and took care of my problem.

I have no problem with helping those that have Insurance problems, but leave the 83% alone. In the end it would be cheaper and hurt less people to just open up the Medicaid requirements some and take in more people, those that have pre existing conditions or can not afford Insurance.

Problem solved! Just lower the requirements for Medicaid, Tort reform and allow anyone that wants to to buy into the already existing government policy, and do do away with State boundaries and life is good!

But liberals do not want to solve the problem they want to gain control!

That actually was discussed-and was in Obama's original plan-but Republicans screamed about it as being a move toward more socialized medicine...The reason they decided to offer a public insurance "option" instead for those folks- and to give the insurance monopoly some competition....

Interestingly its sounding more and more like the Republicans working on the bipartisan bill are backing the insurance companies plan- mandating everyone to have insurance (government subsidies pay for those that can't pay- or under a certain income rate)- and requiring the insurance companies to insure ALL- and not be able to refuse anyone or drop anyone....

A WIN-WIN for the insurance companies as they get many more folks paying in (or the government/taxpayer paying in for those that can't)- and it still leaves them free run to set whatever profit margin they want- and keep raising rates to meet that profit margin....

Last I heard the Insurance companies do not have an outrages profit margin, please correct me if I am wrong?

I guess if they keep raising the rates as you say then, then we will end up with Social medicine anyways because no one will be able to afford it, so the government will get what they want and pay for it for us.
 
Top