• If you are having problems logging in please use the Contact Us in the lower right hand corner of the forum page for assistance.

97% voter participation.

Steve

Well-known member
sounds like a great track record.. if plan on committing voter fraud. :shock: :? :???:
Barack Obama’s election not only caused the oceans to recede, but the dead to rise from the grave.

At least, that’s what an investigation by New York officials revealed when they sent out dozens of agents to vote in a New York election.

New York City’s watchdog Department of Investigations has just provided the latest evidence of how easy it is to commit voter fraud that is almost undetectable. DOI undercover agents showed up at 63 polling places last fall and pretended to be voters who should have been turned away by election officials; the agents assumed the names of individuals who had died or moved out of town, or who were sitting in jail. In 61 instances, or 97 percent of the time, the testers were allowed to vote. Those who did vote cast only a write-in vote for a “John Test” so as to not affect the outcome of any contest. DOI published its findings two weeks ago in a searing 70-page report accusing the city’s Board of Elections of incompetence, waste, nepotism, and lax procedures.
Young undercover agents were able to vote using the names of people three times their age, people who in fact were dead. In one example, a 24-year female agent gave the name of someone who had died in 2012 at age 87

Even the two cases where poll workers turned away an investigator raise eyebrows. In the first case, a poll worker on Staten Island walked outside with the undercover investigator who had just been refused a ballot; the "voter" was advised to go to the polling place near where he used to live and "play dumb" in order to vote. In the second case, the investigator was stopped from voting only because the felon whose name he was using was the son of the election official at the polling place.

so how did the Board of elections respond.. start an investigation to clear up the problem.. sort of. ,... well not really :shock:

they did call for an investigation.. and prosecutions..
NYC Board of Elections Demands Undercover Agents Uncovering Voter Fraud Be Prosecuted.

The Board approved a resolution referring the DOI’s investigators for prosecution. It also asked the state’s attorney general to determine whether DOI had violated the civil rights of voters who had moved or are felons, and it sent a letter of complaint to Mayor Bill de Blasio.
 

Tam

Well-known member
Something stinks here, and it’s just not Gen. Petraeus and the sudden resignation. There are reports of several places showing more votes cast on election day than actual registered voters. Lets look at Boston, Massachusetts. No one expected that dump of a city, or state to go for Mitt Romney in the election, but the math just doesn’t make much sense. If you have a motivated electorate, you typically get about 65% voter turnout. This year overall votes were way down from 2008 for both the Democrat and Republican. But how does one explain that Boston has 387,142 voters on their roll. Yet, somehow 501,282 ‘cards’ were cast on election day, a 129.48% turnout?
 

hypocritexposer

Well-known member
Tam said:
Something stinks here, and it’s just not Gen. Petraeus and the sudden resignation. There are reports of several places showing more votes cast on election day than actual registered voters. Lets look at Boston, Massachusetts. No one expected that dump of a city, or state to go for Mitt Romney in the election, but the math just doesn’t make much sense. If you have a motivated electorate, you typically get about 65% voter turnout. This year overall votes were way down from 2008 for both the Democrat and Republican. But how does one explain that Boston has 387,142 voters on their roll. Yet, somehow 501,282 ‘cards’ were cast on election day, a 129.48% turnout?

Isn't Romney from MA? The Republicans cheated and that's why the Democrats should be "all for" voting ID, unless they want to one day claim that voter fraud was the reason they lost?

"What goes around, comes around"
 

Tam

Well-known member
hypocritexposer said:
Tam said:
Something stinks here, and it’s just not Gen. Petraeus and the sudden resignation. There are reports of several places showing more votes cast on election day than actual registered voters. Lets look at Boston, Massachusetts. No one expected that dump of a city, or state to go for Mitt Romney in the election, but the math just doesn’t make much sense. If you have a motivated electorate, you typically get about 65% voter turnout. This year overall votes were way down from 2008 for both the Democrat and Republican. But how does one explain that Boston has 387,142 voters on their roll. Yet, somehow 501,282 ‘cards’ were cast on election day, a 129.48% turnout?

Isn't Romney from MA? The Republicans cheated and that's why the Democrats should be "all for" voting ID, unless they want to one day claim that voter fraud was the reason they lost?

"What goes around, comes around"

Obama easily won Mass. and now we know why. Elisabeth Warren also won over Scott Brown, the Republican, that stole the Ted Kennedy seat away from the Dems in the By election after Teddy died. The Dems had good reason to make sure they got that Historical long held seats back into Democrat control. It had to hurt knowing a Republican had TEDDY's seat.
 

hypocritexposer

Well-known member
Tam said:
hypocritexposer said:

Isn't Romney from MA? The Republicans cheated and that's why the Democrats should be "all for" voting ID, unless they want to one day claim that voter fraud was the reason they lost?

"What goes around, comes around"

Obama easily won Mass. and now we know why. Elisabeth Warren also won over Scott Brown, the Republican, that stole the Ted Kennedy seat away from the Dems in the By election after Teddy died. The Dems had good reason to make sure they got that Historical long held seats back into Democrat control. It had to hurt knowing a Republican had TEDDY's seat.

are you talking about the bridge he blocked, I mean seat, he blocked, when he killed that young lady by running his car off the bridge and leaving her in the seat where she died, instead of going for help?


Christie is involved in such a scandal, isn't he....my, oh, my. He'll never get elected as a moderate liberal now, will he?
 

Tam

Well-known member
Ironic isn't it, a Democrat like Kennedy kills someone, cheats on his taxes like half of Obama appointees or lies to the voters like Obama did REPEATEDLY and they are rewarded with a career in politics/public service. But a Republican's staffer causes a traffic jam and the Corrupt puppies in the Democrap party sick the dogs after the Republican to dig up every piece a dirt they can find to protect their next lying cheating piece of crap that they plan to inflict on the US to push their leftist agenda.

The saddest part is their low to no info voters believe everything they spew including that the Republicans are the ones that except corrupt politicians as a fact of life and will vote for them while the Dems will not vote for a CORRUPT CANDIDATE.

MY GOD they kept a guy that walked away from a dying woman, as he didn't want to be charged with a DUI after he drove her off a bridge into the water, in office for decades. Yep they don't vote for corrupt candidates they vote for MURDERS. But hey what is a few deaths between friends if it means keeping control of the government right. Just ask Hillary, Bill and from the latest rumors OBAMA. They all have quite a list related to their POLITICAL CAREERS :mad:
 
Top