• If you are having problems logging in please use the Contact Us in the lower right hand corner of the forum page for assistance.

A certain phrase comes to mind when I read this.....

iwannabeacowboy

Well-known member
https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/3990#efmAE8AKdARdAV3
Right now I am petrified that Hillary is almost totally dependent on Republicans nominating Trump....she has huge endemic political weaknesses that she would be wise to rectify.....even a clown like Ted Cruz would be an even money bet to beat and this scares the hell of out me.....

 

Tam

Well-known member
Why do you think the MSM had wall to wall coverage on Trump during the primaries? He was their only hope of getting Hillary elected. Even they knew the Republicans would not unite behind him. Like I said before the Republicans cut and run at the first sign of an issue and with Trump there are a lot of issues and the media was just waiting to drop their bundle of info on the voters to scare everyone off. Besides that he is a threat to their own pocket padding activities.Unlike Hillary he is rich and hopefully can't be bought like the rest of DC.
 

Steve

Well-known member
97,000 votes in Pennsylvania switched from democrat to republican prior to the primaries. they would NOT have changed the results. but it shows the level of corruption could be more then many expected, number wise.






I was told, so take it for what it is worth.

a local D said they get lists of registered voters to challenge those who try to vote, the D said the list is scoured and they make a list of voters who moved, are dead, ect, people who could not and they knew would not be there to vote . In all it makes sense, but he said they spend way more time on the registered democrat list and have what the D called block captains who must live in the neighborhood to "check" on them. He said they were given a sheet with the persons basic info and as he said told to check on them, find out where the voted, where they moved to ect.
this D said they stressed finding out of the people just moved in state and would be given a provisional ballot.
they felt it was almost as if they were hinting at finding those who would not be questioned nor caught by accidental voting twice in the same state.

later the same person laughed when one of the most so bright block captains asked if this was to check so to make sure someone didn't vote twice and get in trouble? said the answer of, yes that would awful. didn't mention as it was illegal and they could get caught.


incidentally one local mayor was charged with voting in Florida and New Jersey over the same period. He was not charged as he "proved" he was not in New Jersey and could not have voted. So who did vote?
 

loomixguy

Well-known member
Where I live, this excrement would fall at the feet of the county clerk. Those of us who work the polling places generally KNOW the voters who come in. Those we don't know have no problem showing us photo ID, and, as long as their name is in the book, and the signatures match up pretty close, they vote.

With both R's & D's working the polls, things should work pretty smooth. Checks & balances works. However, if the workers are all D's, and the county clerk is a D, the chances of voter fraud would increase exponentially.
 

iwannabeacowboy

Well-known member
Seems to me that if I wanted to really mess with the poll, I'd just have a D worker register as an R. So now you have a D and R (D).

You have to start thinking like a progressive, lying, piece of crap liberal.

When caught defrauding an election, people should be tried with the death penalty. There is no worse crime in a free society.
 

Latest posts

Top