A Good Republican

[fff]

Sara Palin is a good Republican. How do I know?

1. As mayor she took her small town from a strong financial position into a bad financial position. They're considering cutting back on their police force and classes at their high school.

2. She uses her authority to settle personal scores. She fired people in her small town who supported her opponant. As soon as she became governor she went after her ex-brother in law.

3. Instead of going to the state capitol to work, she stayed at home and charged the state for doing it!

4. She's now stonwalling the "troopergate" investigation, after saying she would cooperate with the legislature.

5. She can lie without batting an eye.

"Conservative Values" You gotta love 'em. :roll:

 

[Anonymous]

King George is probably dribbling in his pants with his excitement that there could be a female "clone" of him..... :wink: :lol:
With those credentials the annointed "princess" will be accepted well into the Washington rich and elite inner circles.....

 

[fff]

And if McCain should not be able to finish the term, she could get Cheney as her VP. :twisted:

 

[Anonymous]

But the Anchorage Daily News in Alaska reported that when Palin first became mayor in 1996, she asked the city librarian, Mary Ellen Emmons, what her response would be if Palin asked her to remove some books from the library's collection. She did not mention any specific books. Emmons responded by saying she would resist all efforts to ban books.

Emmons subsequently received a letter from Palin informing her that she was going to be fired. The censorship issue was not mentioned as a reason for firing, according to the Daily News.

"The letter just said the new mayor felt Emmons didn't fully support her and had to go," the paper reported. "After a wave of public support for [Emmons], Palin relented and let Emmons keep her job."

 

[Sandhusker]

Sara Palin is a good Republican. How do I know?

1. As mayor she took her small town from a strong financial position into a bad financial position. They're considering cutting back on their police force and classes at their high school.

2. She uses her authority to settle personal scores. She fired people in her small town who supported her opponant. As soon as she became governor she went after her ex-brother in law.

3. Instead of going to the state capitol to work, she stayed at home and charged the state for doing it!

4. She's now stonwalling the "troopergate" investigation, after saying she would cooperate with the legislature.

5. She can lie without batting an eye.

"Conservative Values" You gotta love 'em. :roll:

Did you get these "facts" from the same place you got your "facts" on that sports complex? :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

 

[hopalong]

Say what??????

As the press investigates Sarah Palin, details about this story are coming out. The list of books that Mayor Palin wanted banned is spurious. Some books weren't even published at the time her documented attempt to terminate the City Librarian occured. What seems to have transpired is that Palin discussed banning books with City Librarian Emmons, on the politically correct grounds that they contained offensive language. No list of specific books was presented

 

[Anonymous]

Troopergate keeps getting more Bushlike....

The legislative commission overseeing the investigation will meet tomorrow to decide whether to issue subpoenas. The Alaska attorney general's office has said if they are issued, it will attempt to block them. Palin originally said she would cooperate with reitred special prosecutor Steve Branchflower, but has subsequently told her aides not to testify and is now trying to block subpoenas.

And she and McCain are seen as keeping the country totally in disarray with division.....Old King George is probably just drooling and kicking himself for not bringing Palin in when "Turd Blossom" left to further split the country.... :wink: :lol:

CNN's pollster and political analyst wrote a piece with a similar theme: the conventions did what they were supposed to do, make sure that Democrats are all revved up over Obama and Republicans are all excited about McCain (and in his case, Palin). He notes that the national polls show a dead heat right now. He also observes that while Palin is wildly popular among Republicans, her choice has changed people's views about which candidate can best unite the country. Before the conventions it was McCain by 15 points. Now it is Obama by 16 points, a stunning reversal.

 

[Sandhusker]

Mr. "typical white person" is a uniter? :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

 

[Larrry]

Let's see here now which would we rather have, someone who wants to fire a BAD cop or a known terrorist. Very interesting who the left wants. After all the terrorists support their cause so why not.

 

[VanC]

Sara Palin is a good Republican. How do I know?

1. As mayor she took her small town from a strong financial position into a bad financial position. They're considering cutting back on their police force and classes at their high school.

2. She uses her authority to settle personal scores. She fired people in her small town who supported her opponant. As soon as she became governor she went after her ex-brother in law.

3. Instead of going to the state capitol to work, she stayed at home and charged the state for doing it!

4. She's now stonwalling the "troopergate" investigation, after saying she would cooperate with the legislature.

5. She can lie without batting an eye.

"Conservative Values" You gotta love 'em. :roll:

I asked you a direct question awhile back and never received an answer, so I'll ask it again: In all your many hours of obsessively and frantically digging up dirt on Palin, haven't you come across one thing positive about her? Just one little itsy bitsy teeny weeny thing? Anything?

If you say no, then we have to assume you're either not telling the truth or you really need to broaden your focus. If you only seek out information that you know is going to support your view of the world, then you run the risk of becoming narrow-minded and uninformed. Is that what you really want?

 

[hopalong]

Too late ff fff frankie is already out of focus with the rest of the world!

 

[fff]

I asked you a direct question awhile back and never received an answer, so I'll ask it again: In all your many hours of obsessively and frantically digging up dirt on Palin, haven't you come across one thing positive about her? Just one little itsy bitsy teeny weeny thing? Anything?

If you say no, then we have to assume you're either not telling the truth or you really need to broaden your focus. If you only seek out information that you know is going to support your view of the world, then you run the risk of becoming narrow-minded and uninformed. Is that what you really want?

I'm not "obsessively and frantically digging up dirt on Palin" I'm investigating the person that might be president of the United States on January 21, 2009. And I'm finding her very, very lacking.

If you didn't know that she's now stonewalling "troopergate" after promising to cooperate, you're the one with your head in the sand. If you didn't know she collected per diem while she lived at home, you should be ashamed. If you didn't hear her wrongly claim that Alaska "produces nearly 20 percent of the U.S. domestic supply of energy", that's not my problem. (At the same time McCain claims "Palin Is top energy expert In US"!) If you didn't know that her state takes more earmarks per person than any other state, yet the McCain/Palin ticket unabashedly claims to be against earmarks, shame on you for NOT investigating her. None of the above took any digging. They're on the national news and in the major newspapers/magazines on a regular basis.

She may have some personal attributes that are admirable. I don't care one way or another. I'm not voting for PTA president, Mom of the year, or Miss Alaska, I'm voting for a person who may well be our president next year and, IMO, she's nowhere near experienced enough to fill that bill. John McCain chose her to fill his shoes if he can't serve. That tells me what he thinks about the job of running this country. Either he has distain for the job or he's putting politics ahead of the well being of the country.

 

[hopalong]

How can she be stonewalling as you claim when they have not issues a subpoena or are they going to????

Two people who Branchflower hopes to interview, but who legislators decided not to subpoena, are the governor herself and her former chief of staff, Mike Tibbles, now working as campaign manager for U.S. Sen. Ted Stevens, R-Alaska.

 

[Steve]

fff

She may have some personal attributes that are admirable. I don't care one way or another. I'm not voting for PTA president, Mom of the year, or Miss Alaska, I'm voting for a person who may well be our president next year and, IMO, she's nowhere near experienced enough to fill that bill. John McCain chose her to fill his shoes if he can't serve. That tells me what he thinks about the job of running this country. Either he has distain for the job or he's putting politics ahead of the well being of the country.

I really doubt your voting for McCain either.. so why not scrutinize Obama's pitiful record? as he "nowhere near experienced enough to fill that bill".,... so Either you have disdain for the job or your putting politics ahead of the well being of the country..

 

[Sandhusker]

fff, "I'm voting for a person who may well be our president next year and, IMO, she's nowhere near experienced enough to fill that bill."

You're citing experience as your qualification, but your candidate is the one with less experience. What's your real reason?

 

[fff]

fff

She may have some personal attributes that are admirable. I don't care one way or another. I'm not voting for PTA president, Mom of the year, or Miss Alaska, I'm voting for a person who may well be our president next year and, IMO, she's nowhere near experienced enough to fill that bill. John McCain chose her to fill his shoes if he can't serve. That tells me what he thinks about the job of running this country. Either he has distain for the job or he's putting politics ahead of the well being of the country.

I really doubt your voting for McCain either.. so why not scrutinize Obama's pitiful record? as he "nowhere near experienced enough to fill that bill".,... so Either you have disdain for the job or your putting politics ahead of the well being of the country..

Obama is qualified to be president. He doesn't have the experience that I'd like. That's why I was a Hillary Clinton supporter. But he selected an experienced Senator as his back up. Considering McCain's age, health, and his total flip flop on issues important to me that he once supported, there's no way in hades that he'll get my vote. And I won't waste it on a third party candidate.

 

[Sandhusker]

And Obama's qualifications are?

 

[aplusmnt]

And Obama's qualifications are?

You have not heard by now? He has ran a campaign (well that which his campaign manager did not do) and he organized a Chicago picnic (well that which the party planner did not do).

He did vote Present a bunch, and to his credit it was an accurate vote, since he was present at the time of voting.

The man is very qualified, just not sure yet rather that is for a party planner or being a campaign manager. But to be President that is awful Hubris of him (to quote Alice's new word of the week :wink: ).

 

[Sandhusker]

And Obama's qualifications are?

Why does this question never get answered? :roll:

 

[Aztumbleweed]

Obama is barely qualified to go to the bathroom by hisself. Let alone be the leader of the free world. I have one of you kooky obama supporters working for me she tells me how he is gonna make us friends with the rest of the world and I tell her I rewally don't give a rats ___s about the rest of the world. All I know for sure is the goofball is going to appoint some liberal swamp gas sucking idiot to the usda and screw up my life. Jesus people get a grip or move to some allready socialist country and leave mine alone.!!!!