• If you are having problems logging in please use the Contact Us in the lower right hand corner of the forum page for assistance.

A Line Item Veto Lesson For OT

Mike

Well-known member
http://www.cbpp.org/6-19-06bud2.htm


Did you know that Bush presented another Line-Item veto law in March 6, of 2006? The Reps couldn't get the 60 votes needed to pass it. :roll:

You are way too easy. How does it feel to have your ass handed to you several times in just one day? :roll:
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
Q: What about the line-item veto?
GIULIANI: The line-item veto is unconstitutional. I took Bill Clinton to the Supreme Court and beat him. It’s unconstitutional.

GIULIANI: You have to be honest with people. The line-item veto is unconstitutional. The Supreme Court has ruled on it. I am in favor of a line-item veto, except you have to do it legally. If I had let Pres. Clinton take $250 million away from the people of my city illegally and unconstitutionally, I wouldn’t have been much of a mayor.
 

Mike

Well-known member
Oldtimer said:
Q: What about the line-item veto?
GIULIANI: The line-item veto is unconstitutional. I took Bill Clinton to the Supreme Court and beat him. It’s unconstitutional.

GIULIANI: You have to be honest with people. The line-item veto is unconstitutional. The Supreme Court has ruled on it. I am in favor of a line-item veto, except you have to do it legally. If I had let Pres. Clinton take $250 million away from the people of my city illegally and unconstitutionally, I wouldn’t have been much of a mayor.

You are one Dumb-azz SOB. :roll: The Line-Item Veto Law was introduced & passed by a Republican Congress............. :lol:
The Line Item Veto Act of 1996 enacted a line-item veto for the Federal government of the United States, but its effect was brief due to judicial review.

Public Law (P.L.) 104-130 [1] was introduced by Senator Bob Dole on 4 January 1995, cosponsored by Senator John McCain and 28 other senators. Related House Bills included H.R. 147, H.R. 391, H.R. 2,H.R. 27 and H.R. 3136. The bill was signed into law by President Bill Clinton on April 9, 1996 and was immediately challenged in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia by a group of six senators, first among whom was Senator Robert Byrd (D-WV), where it was declared unconstitutional by District Judge Harry Jackson, a Reagan appointee, on April 10, 1997. The case was subsequently remanded by the Supreme Court of the United States with instructions to dismiss on the grounds that the senators had not suffered sufficient, particularized injury to maintain suit under Article III of the United States Constitution (i.e., the senators lacked standing). The case, Raines v. Byrd, 521 U.S. 811 (1997), was handed down on June 26, 1997, and did not include a judgement on the constitutional grounds of the law.

:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
Mike said:
Oldtimer said:
Q: What about the line-item veto?
GIULIANI: The line-item veto is unconstitutional. I took Bill Clinton to the Supreme Court and beat him. It’s unconstitutional.

GIULIANI: You have to be honest with people. The line-item veto is unconstitutional. The Supreme Court has ruled on it. I am in favor of a line-item veto, except you have to do it legally. If I had let Pres. Clinton take $250 million away from the people of my city illegally and unconstitutionally, I wouldn’t have been much of a mayor.

You are one Dumb-azz SOB. :roll: The Line-Item Veto Law was introduced & passed by a Republican Congress............. :lol:
The Line Item Veto Act of 1996 enacted a line-item veto for the Federal government of the United States, but its effect was brief due to judicial review.

Public Law (P.L.) 104-130 [1] was introduced by Senator Bob Dole on 4 January 1995, cosponsored by Senator John McCain and 28 other senators. Related House Bills included H.R. 147, H.R. 391, H.R. 2,H.R. 27 and H.R. 3136. The bill was signed into law by President Bill Clinton on April 9, 1996 and was immediately challenged in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia by a group of six senators, first among whom was Senator Robert Byrd (D-WV), where it was declared unconstitutional by District Judge Harry Jackson, a Reagan appointee, on April 10, 1997. The case was subsequently remanded by the Supreme Court of the United States with instructions to dismiss on the grounds that the senators had not suffered sufficient, particularized injury to maintain suit under Article III of the United States Constitution (i.e., the senators lacked standing). The case, Raines v. Byrd, 521 U.S. 811 (1997), was handed down on June 26, 1997, and did not include a judgement on the constitutional grounds of the law.

:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

So McCain and crew passed an illegal- unconstitutional law.... Whats new :???:
It was a Republican- who was one of the Champions of last year running for President of the socalled "fiscal conservative" ( :roll: :lol: ) party that also challenged it because some of his pork for NYC was cut out...
 

Mike

Well-known member
Sure ain't new that you're a LIAR and an IDIOT, that's for sure.

If the law was so illegal why did Clinton sign it? :roll:

Did you see where BYRD was the first to challenge it? :lol:
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
Mike said:
Sure ain't new that you're a LIAR and an IDIOT, that's for sure.

If the law was so illegal why did Clinton sign it? :roll:

Did you see where BYRD was the first to challenge it? :lol:

Yep- and apparently correctly if it was ruled unconstitutional...
But it was one of your Republican Champions that got the ruling when Clinton cut out some of his pork...

Oh thats right- Repubs don't do pork do they :???: :roll: :wink: :lol:

"Bridges to Nowhere" and "Roads to Nowhere" :roll: :wink: :lol: :lol:

Q: What about the line-item veto?
GIULIANI: The line-item veto is unconstitutional. I took Bill Clinton to the Supreme Court and beat him. It’s unconstitutional.
 

Mike

Well-known member
You're so twisted you don't where you stand... :roll:

Let's see:

The Line Item Veto was introduced and passed by a Republican Congress and you blame the Republicans because the Supreme Court Over-Ruled it.


WOW! You are real thinker there OT. :roll:
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
Mike said:
You're so twisted you don't where you stand... :roll:

Let's see:

The Line Item Veto was introduced and passed by a Republican Congress and you blame the Republicans because the Supreme Court Over-Ruled it.


WOW! You are real thinker there OT. :roll:

They apparently passed a flawed and unconstitutional law- and what brought it to a head and got a Supreme Court ruling was a Republican crying over his lost pork...
 

Mike

Well-known member
They apparently passed a flawed and unconstitutional law-

So................ if it was so flawed and unconstitutional why do you continue to champion it?

OT wrote:
You'll never get rid of earmarks or pork in bills until the President has a line item veto...And as I remember it- when we had one- Republicans were upset because Clinton used it to cut out some of their pork- and they took it to court and got it ruled Unconstitutional...

So now we have what we have....

So what you really meant was ONE REPUBLICAN MAYOR was upset. :roll:

If I were as dumb as you, I would shoot myself........... :roll:
 

aplusmnt

Well-known member
Oldtimer said:
Oh thats right- Repubs don't do pork do they :???: :roll: :wink: :lol:

"Bridges to Nowhere" and "Roads to Nowhere" :roll: :wink: :lol: :lol:

According to the Democrats that is not pork that is Stimulus! :wink: :roll:
 

hopalong

Well-known member
Mike said:
They apparently passed a flawed and unconstitutional law-

So................ if it was so flawed and unconstitutional why do you continue to champion it?

OT wrote:
You'll never get rid of earmarks or pork in bills until the President has a line item veto...And as I remember it- when we had one- Republicans were upset because Clinton used it to cut out some of their pork- and they took it to court and got it ruled Unconstitutional...

So now we have what we have....

So what you really meant was ONE REPUBLICAN MAYOR was upset. :roll:

If I were as dumb as you, I would shoot myself........... :roll:

He is not allowed to have bullets! only rubber bands because of all the kool aid he has drank
OH VEY
 

Bullhauler

Well-known member
Mike said:
Bullhauler said:
kolanuraven said:
What has gotten into you as of late??


I think if he was TALKING in Montana instead of TYPING in Alabama he wouldn't be such a mouthy sob.

Don't be so sure of it Butt-Head.

About every other word that OT puts here is a lie.

Lets just say you wouldn't be talking like that for long. You probably are stupid enough to run your mouth off like that though.
 

Mike

Well-known member
Bullhauler said:
Mike said:
Bullhauler said:
I think if he was TALKING in Montana instead of TYPING in Alabama he wouldn't be such a mouthy sob.

Don't be so sure of it Butt-Head.

About every other word that OT puts here is a lie.

Lets just say you wouldn't be talking like that for long. You probably are stupid enough to run your mouth off like that though.

You're talking mighty big for someone hiding behind a monitor. :lol:
 
Top