• If you are having problems logging in please use the Contact Us in the lower right hand corner of the forum page for assistance.

A most depressing email:

Help Support Ranchers.net:

Faster horses

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 11, 2005
Messages
28,832
Reaction score
73
Location
NE WY at the foot of the Big Horn mountains
Subject: Depressing

SCARRRRRY, be sure to read the obituary at the end very interesting


DR. WILLIAMS predicts that Obama can not lose the 2012 election.


IN ADDITION TO THE VOTING BLOCKS HE MENTIONS, THERE IS ANOTHER HUGE GROUP: THE NEARLY ONE-HALF OF ALL ADULTS DO NOT PAY ANY TAXES AND, IN FACT, MOST OF THEM RECEIVE MONEY FROM THE GOVERNMENT. THESE PEOPLE DO NOT WANT TO "SHAKE THE BOAT" TO DO ANYTHING TO STOP THE FLOW OF TAXPAYER MONEY TO THEMSELVES.


Dr. Williams prediction: Maybe you have read some newspaper articles written by Dr. Williams a conservative economist who happens to be Black. He has taught at several Universities and is currently teaching at George Mason University.







No Matter What


By Dr. Walter Williams


Can President Obama be defeated in 2012? No. He can't. I am going on record as saying that President Barak Obama will win a second term.


The media won't tell you this because a good election campaign means hundreds of millions (or in Obama's case billions) of dollars to them in advertising.


But the truth is, there simply are no conditions under which Barak Obama can be defeated in 2012.
The quality of the Republican candidate doesn't matter. Obama gets reelected. Nine percent unemployment? No problem. Obama will win. Gas pricesmoving toward five dollars a gallon? He still wins. The economy soars or goes into the gutter. Obama wins. War in the Middle East? He wins a second term.


America's role as the leading Superpower disappears? Hurrah for Barak Obama! The U.S. government rushes toward bankruptcy, the dollar continues to sink on world markets and the price of daily goods and services soars due to inflation fueled by Obama's extraordinary deficit spending? Obama wins handily.


You are crazy Williams. Don't you understand how volatile politics can be when overall economic, government, and world conditions are declining? Sure I do.


And that's why I know Obama will win. The American people are notoriously ignorant of economics. And economics is the key to why Obama should be defeated.


Even when Obama's policies lead the nation to final ruin, the majority of the American people are going to believe the bait-and-switch tactics Obama and his supporters in the media will use to explain why it isn't his fault. After all, things were much worse than understood when he took office.


Obama's reelection is really a very, very simple math problem. Consider the following:


1) Blacks will vote for Obama blindly. Period. Doesn't matter what he does. It's a race thing. He's one of us,

2) College educated women will vote for Obama. Though they will be offended by this, they swoon at his oratory. It's really not more complex than that,

3) Liberals will vote for Obama. He is their great hope,

4) Democrats will vote for Obama. He is the leader of their party and his coat tails will carry them to victory nationwide,

5) Hispanics will vote for Obama. He is the path to citizenship for those who are illegal and Hispanic leaders recognize the political clout they carry in the Democratic Party,

6) Union members will vote overwhelmingly for Obama. He is their key to money and power in business, state and local politics,

7) Big Business will support Obama. They already have. He has almost $1 Billion dollars in his reelection purse gained largely from his connections with Big Business and is gaining more everyday. Big Business loves Obama because he gives them access to taxpayer money so long as they support his social and political agenda,

8) The media love him. They may attack the people who work for him, but they love him. After all, to not love him would be racist,

9) Most other minorities and special interest groups will vote for him. Oddly, the overwhelming majority of Jews and Muslims will support him because they won't vote Republican. American Indians will support him. Obviously homosexuals tend to vote Democratic. And lastly,


10) Approximately half of independents will vote for Obama. And he doesn't need anywhere near that number because he has all of the groups previously mentioned. The President will win an overwhelming victory in 2012.


-- Dr. Walter Williams



Obituary-Very Interesting!


Born 1776, Died 2008


It doesn't hurt to read this several times.


Professor Joseph Olson of Hamline University School of Law in St. Paul , Minnesota , points out some interesting facts concerning the last Presidential election:
Number of States won by: Obama:19 McCain: 29
Square miles of land won by: Obama:580,000 McCain: 2,427,000
Population of counties won by: Obama:127million McCain: 143 million
Murder rate per 100,000 residents in counties won by: Obama: 13.2 McCain: 2.1
Professor Olson adds: "In aggregate, the map of the territory McCain won was mostly the land owned by the taxpaying citizens of the country.

Obama territory mostly encompassed those citizens living in low income tenements and living off various forms of government welfare..."

Olson believes the United States is now somewhere between the "complacency and apathy" phase of Professor Tyler's definition of democracy, with some forty percent of the nation's population already having reached the "governmental dependency" phase.
If Congress grants amnesty and citizenship to twenty million criminal invaders called illegal's - and they vote - then we can say goodbye to the USA in fewer than five years.

If you are in favor of this, then by all means, delete this message.

If you are not, then pass this along to help everyone realize just how much is at stake, knowing that apathy is the greatest danger to our freedom.
 

andybob

Well-known member
Joined
May 24, 2006
Messages
1,199
Reaction score
16
Location
Fordingbridge England.
Democracies have always ended by their imploding under the pressure of excessive tax on the "haves" (those who work for their living) to support the "have nots" (we all know who these parasites are) by the politicians buying votes (through social programs) to keep themselves in their inflated salaried jobs. Time to revive the Confederacy and leave the rest to implode on their own?
 

andybob

Well-known member
Joined
May 24, 2006
Messages
1,199
Reaction score
16
Location
Fordingbridge England.
Whatever works for the honest folk Big Muddy, it seems we are all in the same boat in whatever western country we live in, a lot of discussion over here about food price increases and our "obligation" to feed the developing countries (as if we don't have enough of our own parasites)
I was not popular for suggesting they first reduce their populations then they would be able to feed themselves (it starts with responsible government, but that is a complex subject).
 

okfarmer

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 14, 2010
Messages
1,059
Reaction score
0
Location
Oklahoma
There are a few problems in this theory:

1. With the history of civil rights issues, many black Americans were excited to see a black man be able to be elected to the highest office in the land. Now many, know that he was the wrong black man to be voted in. Trying to group all people of any ethnicity together with this election shows lack of reasoning. This is not saying that there will not be idiots, but I don't think there will be as many people this time voting blindly on color.

2. This is an even dumber statement. I would say ignorant, but by definition means lack of understanding. I think the author knows what college educated women are, so I will stick with this is a dumb statement. Women with conservative tendencies will not be swayed. Women with liberal tendencies, were already liberal. It is the indipendants that will decide the election- just as in the past several. And all the above that he mentioned will not matter, will actually matter.
In addition, what if a woman is heading the Republican candidacy? Pretty certain it will influence some women voters. Just like so many were excited to have helped the first Black president, you really don't think many women will be excited to have helped put into the office the first woman president?

3. and 4. What is new here? This is not a "deciding" factor nor a revelation.

5. This guy is out of touch and it shows here. I don't recall illegal individuals having the right to vote? Secondly, the majority of the "legal" hispanic voters (i.e. the ones that can vote) I have met or spoken with don't want amnesty and they want the borders secured. They feel just as threatened as anyone else with our lack of border control.

6. Again, this is not a new revelation. When was the last time unions voted conservative?

7. Which Big Business? I don't see all big business, and definately not small business.

8. Shamoo will have everyone convinced that the media is only lying to them by 2012 :D

9. Most minorities have been Democratic in the past- this is not new. The difference last time, was the blindness many had for voting for the first black president. Those individuals that crossed the line, have regretted it and won't be back for second helpings.

10. Seriously? This guy truly thinks that Obama has picked up support? Look at the valid polls.
 

Traveler

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 5, 2007
Messages
5,328
Reaction score
2
This didn't sound to me like something that Dr. Walter E. Williams would write. It wasn't.

http://www.snopes.com/politics/soapbox/nomatterwhat.asp
 

okfarmer

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 14, 2010
Messages
1,059
Reaction score
0
Location
Oklahoma
Traveler said:
This didn't sound to me like something that Dr. Walter E. Williams would write. It wasn't.

http://www.snopes.com/politics/soapbox/nomatterwhat.asp

That would make more sense.
 

Latest posts

Top