• If you are having problems logging in please use the Contact Us in the lower right hand corner of the forum page for assistance.

A new twist--and it makes sense

Faster horses

Well-known member
Judge Andrew Napolitano said on “Fox & Friends” Thursday that United States Intelligence agents were responsible for leaking documents to WikiLeaks during the election, not the Russian government.

“Look, who had an incentive to prevent Mrs. Clinton from becoming President of the United States?” he asked. “Whose agents had their real identities and locations exposed by the reckless manner? … Who had access to all of this material without having to steal any codes?”

“The United States Intelligence agents who did not want this woman in charge of the federal government and exposing more agents and resources and undercover assets in the Middle East,” Napolitano said, answering his own questions.

Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2016/12/15/judge-napolitano-drops-a-bomb-u-s-intelligence-was-behind-hacks-not-russia/#ixzz4T0pMIUIa
 

Brad S

Well-known member
Silver said:
It that were to be true I can't imagine a scarier place for your country to be in.


Well, perhaps some collection of generals would be scarier, but Intel operatives shaping an election is not democricy. There still exists that pesky "truth" issue. If the ops were merely bringing exposing truth to light, is that bad or heroic? Depends on whose side won I guess. socratise seemed to suggest the origin of truth was irrelevant. Machiavelli seems to be ok with it.
 

Mike

Well-known member
And the whole thing started with Trump being in on it was because he made a joke about the Russsians may find Hillary's lost 30,000 emails from her home server?
 

Faster horses

Well-known member
Mike said:
And the whole thing started with Trump being in on it was because he made a joke about the Russsians may find Hillary's lost 30,000 emails from her home server?

Sounds like they heard that an ran with it. Desperate people do desperate things.
 

Traveler

Well-known member
Faster horses said:
Mike said:
And the whole thing started with Trump being in on it was because he made a joke about the Russsians may find Hillary's lost 30,000 emails from her home server?

Sounds like they heard that an ran with it. Desperate people do desperate things.
Desperately dishonest. I was listening to Judge Napolitano as well. I would expect him to be absolutely right. The whole left wing talking point BS is making them look even more foolish, and Obama more inept and ineffective.
 

Faster horses

Well-known member
Traveler said:
Faster horses said:
Mike said:
And the whole thing started with Trump being in on it was because he made a joke about the Russsians may find Hillary's lost 30,000 emails from her home server?

Sounds like they heard that an ran with it. Desperate people do desperate things.
Desperately dishonest. I was listening to Judge Napolitano as well. I would expect him to be absolutely right. The whole left wing talking point BS is making them look even more foolish, and Obama more inept and ineffective.

You know that, I know that and almost everyone on this site knows that.........but the liberals tend to stick their head in the sand. If it doesn't fit their narrative, they don't want to listen. They have got this country in a fine mess and the spineless Republicans let them get away with everything.
 

Mike

Well-known member
Buckwheat is now saying it didn't alarm him that the Russians were involved in hacking aat firsst because he thought Hillary was going to win. Which means that the problem is with WHO WON, not with the Russians hacking.................. :cry2:
 

Tam

Well-known member
Ok I give up, I posted a video on here more than once where an ex intel agent said he and some in the US intell services did it. I also posted along with it a video of Assauge saying it wasn't the Russians. So is what the Judge said on Fox and Friends a big surprise now.

http://ranchers.net/forum/viewtopic.php?f=6&t=76972&start=12
 

Faster horses

Well-known member
Don't give up. It's okay if we see something on it more than once. I know how forgetful I am. :lol:

I, for one, appreciate your efforts. You are very knowledgeable and informed. And willing to share!
 

Tam

Well-known member
Mike said:
Buckwheat is now saying it didn't alarm him that the Russians were involved in hacking aat firsst because he thought Hillary was going to win. Which means that the problem is with WHO WON, not with the Russians hacking.................. :cry2:


Nothing alarms Obama unless it effects him personally, laws, limits and Redlines mean NOTHING to him. He figured Hillary had enough money and backing to win with a landslide and with that landslide his legacy, executive orders and secrets would be safe and carried on by Hillary. But the landslide was against her and his legacy and now they are looking for every possible excuse to explain the lose to their donors so they will not stop pouring good money after bad to prop up the Democrat party.

Anyone with half a brain can see by the seats the Dems lost all the way back to the states Russia had little effect on what the US voters were voting for or against and that was THE ECONOMY. All you have to do is look at the counties he won compared to the one she won. The hard working counties he won because they WANT jobs, she won the "CITIES" where those that want government benefits reside. People are tired of being told the economy is great and the unemployment rate is going down. But the truth is it is going down but the reason is people have given up and stopped looking and because of that Obama's unemployment rate looks good for him. Put the people that stopped looking and those under employed into that number and it would be MUCH DIFFERENT.

The Dems are fine with the number as is because the more under employed, unemployed, and illegals, the more that are unwilling to risk a vote for anyone but a Democrat. To bad for the Dems the unemployment no matter how many times they try lengthen it, is running out and the people need jobs to survive. The Dems ran on hope for the last 8 years and voters lost their hope and jobs. Trump's smartest campaign quote was "Vote for me what do you have to loss". They could go for another 4 years of the same or think all the way out of the DC box and take a chance on a guy that has spent his life actually signing the checks on the front not just those that sign them on the back.
 

Tam

Well-known member
Faster horses said:
Trump has a tower. What did Obama have before he was elected?
Just an ugly wife that was not proud of her country.

That is the funny thing about Trump, his likely is the only President that is taking a step down in living accommodations when he moves into the White House and He will have 8 more dollars in his pocket, if he gets re-elected, when he leaves office than when he took office. Let's just pray he is not forced to sell his tower to keep the Democrap impeachment wolves away from his family's door.

Obama, on the other hand, will leave office with a pocket full of money from book deals about how as the first Black President he found the US to be a racist country and tax payers funding his secret service protection so he can play golf daily for the rest of his life. When what he should leave office with is a prison library full of books for his enjoyment and prison guards protecting him for the rest of his life. Oh and visits from his still ugly wife that is back being not proud with her country.
 

Faster horses

Well-known member
Traveler said:
Not only is his wife still ugly and not proud of her country, she now has no hope......according to her.

Now maybe she understands how we have felt.........for the last 8 years.

I swear, these libs live in a bubble. They have no clue about the real world. :mad:
 
Top