Disagreeable said:Jinglebob said:I think that one of our first laws in this country is that you have the right to do with your body as you please as long as it's not hurting another person. When you decide to kill a child(person) that is inside of you, you no longer are just dealing with your body. Elementary Watson, there are now TWO people involved.
The cluster of cells that makes up a fetus can't live outside the woman's body. IMO, she should have the right to terminate a pregnancy until the fetus can live on it's own. Then it's a baby. Then it has rights.
I AM NOT SHOUTING, JUST MAKING IT POSSIBLE TO SEE WHO IS WRITING HERE, EASIER.
SOOOO, CAN A NEW BORN BABY LIVE OUTSIDE IT'S MOTHER? WITHOUT ANY HELP WHATSOEVER? I WOULD GUESS IN THE PROPER ENVIROMENT THEY WOULD HAVE TO BE AT LEAST 2 TO 3 YEARS OLD. SO IF THAT IS RIGHT, WHY NOT KILL CHILDREN UP TO THAT AGE, IF THEY ARE A BURDEN?
If you want to pierce your body, or put legal drugs into your body or even sell your body or I'd even go so far as to say, destroy your body, I ain't got a problem with that. The moment you become pregnant, then there is another person involved and socitey has the right to stop you from harming another persaon. We can even get you for drinking or taking the wrong drugs while pregnant, because THERE IS ANOTHER HUMAN BEING INSIDE YOUR BODY. Did you hear that this time? Don't be so obtuse.
My, aren't you being a bit liberal? It's ok with you to destroy the temple God has given you?
I DIDN'T SAY ANYTHING ABOUT MY BODY, I SAID YOUR BODY. THAT SEEMS TO BE THE ONE YOU WANT TO CONTROL, ISN'T IT?
If you want to control your body, DON'T GET PREGNANT!![]()
Women get pregnant through no fault of their own, rape and incest come to mind. Is her fault, too?
NOPE, IT SURE ISN'T AND THIS LAW WOULD STILL ALLOW THE USE OF ABORTIFICANTS IN THOSE CASES, UP TO A CERTAIN LENGTH OF PREGNANCY.
Why do you think South Dakota didn't make the penalty for abortion a Class 1 or 2 felony? If abortion is murder, why is the penalty similar to having a bag of marijuana? Or repeated drunk driving? And why is the woman not charged with anything?
I'M NOT SURE. KINDNESS, COMPASSION?
I THINK THEY JUST WANT PEOPLE TO STOP USING ABORTION AS A FORM OF BIRTH CONTROL. WHY WOULD YOU WANT TO GET RID OF A CHILD , NOT CAUSED BY RAPE OR INCEST, OTHER THAN THINKING THAT THE CHILD WOULD BE PLACING A BURDEN ON THE MOTHER?
IF THAT IS THE CASE, THEY SHOULD HAVE TAKEN PRECAUTIONS NOT TO GET PREGNANT, IN THE FIRST PLACE.
IF YOU ARE TOO STUPID TO USE BIRTH CONTROL OF SOME FORM, YOU PROBABLY SHOULDN'T BE HAVING SEX.
AND IF YOU ARE THAT STUPID, YOU OUGHT TO AT LEAST GIVE THE CHILD UP FOR ADOPTION TO SOME LOVING PARENTS WHO WILL CHERISH AND NURTURE THE CHILD.
KIND OF LIKE WHAT WE DO WITH STUPID COWS WHO DON'T WANT THEIR CALVES. ONLY, WITH CATTLE, WE HAVE THE OPTION TO ELIMINATE THEM FROM THE GENE POOL WHEN THEY ACT THAT WAY.
By the way dis, you have a nice day. I'll pray for you.