Am I wrong in my thinging?
Yes.
Clinton (the one who did something wrong, remember) has *already been* prosecuted for this. He has already had his impeachment hearings.
Gore (the guy who didn't do anything, remember) thinks the president should be closely scrutinized. Past issues don't make any difference in the matter that the president has been accused of privacy violations.
There is a special, secret court specifically set up to issue warrants for this very thing. It moves very quickly. Within hours. It can issue warrants retroactively (ie, after the tap has begun). They almost never say no.
Bush did not go through this route.
Why not?
Something stinks in Denmark, which was Gore's point.
If you want to think he's a hypocrit, so be it. Obviously no one's going to change your mind. Shoot, his entire administration should probably be hanged for his crimes, eh?
But that doesn't make his complaint any less of a concern...
Only time will tell and maybe thats why the Republicans aren't jumping on board like you suggest.
Like I suggest?
I linked you to a pretty conservative paper (the Wall Street Journal) which says it's considerably more than a Nebraska housewife's suggestion. :lol:
How can you have missed this? There is a struggle going on in the Republican party to re-define ideals and platforms.
Traditionally, it has been a very get-government-out party. But lately that's anything but true...