• If you are having problems logging in please use the Contact Us in the lower right hand corner of the forum page for assistance.

al-Qaeda Exploiting US Polarization

hypocritexposer

Well-known member
Where were you when I brought this up 3 months ago, I even linked to the video. At that time it was fearmongering.

http://ranchers.net/forum/viewtopic.php?p=378098&highlight=qaeda+eyes+bio+attack+mexico#378098
 

Sandhusker

Well-known member
I think this is fear mongering from the left. Al-Quada would like to link up with somebody, anybody to hurt us, that's not really news. Our border is wide open, that's not really news. This article doesn't tell us anything we couldn't already figure out very easily.

What scares me the most about this article is that it is planting the seeds in the reader's mind that militas would help al-Quada, with no facts at all that show that there is any interest at all from the militas themselves. All they have is one side wanting a deal, and they're just speculating who would take up the offer. Considering that they love to paint right-wingers as Klansmen who hate anybody not white and protestant, suggesting that they would partner with "towelheads" is a contradiction.

You then consider the broad brush this administration uses to paint right-wing "extremists" and you see the foundation being laid to manufacture a BS reason to go after conservatives. They're already making these idiotic claims about "plants" in town hall meetings (while not saying anything about Obama's plants), blathering about terrorist links isn't much of a stretch.
 

hypocritexposer

Well-known member
If you know how they work and that they infiltrate RWE groups, why are you so quick to label people as RWE?

You are making accusations, without doing any background investigation or fact finding.

this is not written to you specifically Reader, but "you" meaning anyone that would.
 

hypocritexposer

Well-known member
reader (the Second) said:
hypocritexposer said:
If you know how they work and that they infiltrate RWE groups, why are you so quick to label people as RWE?

You are making accusations, without doing any background investigation or fact finding.

this is not written to you specifically Reader, but "you" meaning anyone that would.

First of all, I never heard the abbreviation RWE until today and have never used it.

As for me, in my experience from what you have posted and having read the news and various blogs and sites, there are a few websites and individuals that are devoted to rightwing lunacy and they feed off each other. WND and Farah and Orly are among them.

Certainly those who form groups devoted to racism or anti-Semitism would fall in this category.

I have NO tolerance for these people. Orly is a joke so I have some sympathy for her. I think she's a very eccentric, somewhat dense product of being brought up in the USSR. I met people like her as far back as 1969 when the first refuseniks were let out of the USSR.

RWE is an acronym that was first used on PB back when we were discussing the DHS report on RightwingExtremism

I post from more MSM than I have ever posted from orly, wnd or farah, so maybe you have mislabbeled me.

did you comment or read the articles I posted from Salon, Washington Times, Politico, American Thinker, etc?

I thought you would have been very interested in the articles I posted about the African Colonial, written by a black person and their perspective.

and as far as orly, like I have said in the past, I do not follow her, yesterday I did a google search about Major Cook to add to the discussion, and posted what I found, and like always Alice pounced.

your false accusations and assumptions are very revealing on your attitude towards those that have different opinions.
 

Steve

Well-known member
R2 said:
I thought this was worth a thread of its own. I have known for a long time that al-Qaeda aligns itself with whoever might help it,

an interesting thought.. but would white supremacist groups be more likely to align themselves with radical Islamic terrorists? seems the only ones they "hate" more then the government are "non-whites"

or would it be a better bet for radical islamic terrorists to work with an already radical group friendly to the islamic cause such as black panthers?
 

backhoeboogie

Well-known member
reader (the Second) said:
Steve said:
R2 said:
I thought this was worth a thread of its own. I have known for a long time that al-Qaeda aligns itself with whoever might help it,

an interesting thought.. but would white supremacist groups be more likely to align themselves with radical Islamic terrorists? seems the only ones they "hate" more then the government are "non-whites"

or would it be a better bet for radical islamic terrorists to work with an already radical group friendly to the islamic cause such as black panthers?

When radical Islamic terrorists dupe others into allying with them, they may not reveal who they are and what their goal is. Remember that there are many Muslims who are English speaking and Western and that they have a belief that they can behave as infidels, shave their beards, pretend to be secular, if it serves their purpose.

No, al Qaeda is sophisticated and they know where the soft underbelly is which is the growing polarization that was encouraged in the last couple of decades. The Black Panthers by way of any example are a 60s phenomenon and would raise more alarm than some guy like Timothy McVeigh.

You need to dig a little deeper before you use that "dupe" assumption. They've been aligned for quite some time. At least partially.
 

hypocritexposer

Well-known member
I have known for a long time that al-Qaeda aligns itself with whoever might help it, including drug cartels, gangs, etc. It is an intelligent and opportunistic group. I would not be so quick to dismiss the idea that it would find exploiting the anti-Government groups, such as certain militias, very attractive.

I have been merely speculating here, based on my reading about al-Qaeda methods for the past few years.
 

hypocritexposer

Well-known member
scared of what? It's not you bringing facts to the debate, that's for sure.

what goes around comes around.

By the way still working on the Biofuel project?
 

Sandhusker

Well-known member
reader (the Second) said:
Steve said:
R2 said:
I thought this was worth a thread of its own. I have known for a long time that al-Qaeda aligns itself with whoever might help it,

an interesting thought.. but would white supremacist groups be more likely to align themselves with radical Islamic terrorists? seems the only ones they "hate" more then the government are "non-whites"

or would it be a better bet for radical islamic terrorists to work with an already radical group friendly to the islamic cause such as black panthers?

When radical Islamic terrorists dupe others into allying with them, they may not reveal who they are and what their goal is. Remember that there are many Muslims who are English speaking and Western and that they have a belief that they can behave as infidels, shave their beards, pretend to be secular, if it serves their purpose.

No, al Qaeda is sophisticated and they know where the soft underbelly is which is the growing polarization that was encouraged in the last couple of decades. The Black Panthers by way of any example are a 60s phenomenon and would raise more alarm than some guy like Timothy McVeigh.

That "60's phenomenon" seems to be involved in voter intimidation just last Nov., Reader. They also seem to have friends in high places.

If al-Quada was looking for friends here, which I'm sure they are, they have a lot in common with the Nation of Islam and their leader (and Obama's "church's" man of the year Farrakhan). And hey, there's the unrepentant William Ayers, he's already tried it a few times. The good ol boys militias certainly aren't the favorites if you look around. In fact, the notion is actually laughable.
 
Top