Faster horses
Well-known member
Are Americans Dead Because Barack Hussein Obama Didn't Want To Hurt His Prospects For Re-Election?
Are Libyan Ambassador Chris Stevens, Information Specialist Sean Smith and former Navy SEALS Glen Doherty and Tyrone Woods dead simply to satisfy one man's ego?
Were lives actually placed in peril simply to conceal from the American people that Barack Obama's proclaimed "Arab Spring" was an abject failure?
Is the leader of the free world that narcissistic... that self-absorbed? Is he simply an incompetent buffoon? Or... is the truth much worse?
The American people want answers. The American people deserve answers; and with Congressional hearings starting this week, the time to demand that Congress give us some REAL answers is now... before we step into the voting booth.
But The Obama Regime Isn't Simply Covering Up A "Policy Failure" ... What We Already Know Is Even More Shocking.
He lied to US and he apologized to OUR ENEMIES to SAVE HIS POLITICAL SKIN... and if Congress can't hold his feet to the fire this time around, then none of them deserve to be in office next year.
The fact that Team Obama knew Stevens literally had a target on his back and did nothing is not the issue. At issue is the fact that Team Obama continually downgraded Stevens' security as the threats against him became ever more apparent.
It's almost as if someone wanted Stevens dead.
Lt. Col. Andy Wood, a Green Beret with the Utah National Guard who headed the team assigned to protect Stevens and Libyan embassy personnel told CBS News that his sixteen man team and another six-man team were recalled from the embassy a month prior to the September 11th attack.
According to FOX News, Woods said "it was unbelievable to him that the State Department decreased security in Libya when it did, [after] he showed them how dangerous and volatile and unpredictable the entire environment in Libya was with at least 13 security incidents before September 11th backing up his case."
You read that right. AFTER multiple reports that Stevens' life was in jeopardy, Wood's unit and another unit assigned to protect Stevens were ordered back to the United States.
For those who asked why Stevens' security was so lax, there's the answer... an answer which raises far too many disturbing questions... questions that demand answers.
"Revealed: Jihadists Had Threatened To Kill Ambassador On FACEBOOK And The U.S. Consulate In Libya Was Attacked TWICE Before 9/11 Anniversary."
But Woods wasn't the only one sounding the alarm. If you didn't see the headline above, that's because it was carried by The Daily Mail in England on October 2nd.
The terrorists responsible for the attack on our consulate in Libya actually announced their intentions on Facebook (yeah... Facebook) beforehand and apparently, even Stevens had knowledge of the Facebook post.
According to The Daily Mail: "One such post mentioned the route that Stevens took on his morning jog, prompting the diplomat to briefly stop running for his own safety."
Requests for more security were ignored and FBI investigations into the incident were stonewalled under the premise that the "crime scene" wasn't safe.
Of course, safety issues didn't stop CNN reporters from picking up Stevens' diary from the rubble. Entries confirmed that Stevens knew he was in grave danger. And how did the Obama Regime react to CNN reporters doing the job it had refused to do. Philippe Reines, a State Department spokesman, called CNN's actions “indefensible.”
A reporter with The Daily Caller wrote: "considering my own encounter with the State Department and the way they’ve handled it — lying and stonewalling — it’s nauseating to watch them pontificate about ethics. To them, I’m just another 'bump in the road.' Literally."
Negligence that can't simply be attributed to gross incompetence? ... outrageous lies? ... stonewalling, cover-ups and refusals to investigate? ... there's much more going on here than meets the eye, and the American people need the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
It's Almost As If Someone Wanted Stevens Dead.
We know what people are thinking. An article by columnist Erik Rush, published by Canada Free Press, actually carried the headline: "Was Ambassador Stevens’ Death A Hit?"
Those who maintain suspicions can't be dismissed. Gross incompetence coupled with intricate and highly complex disinformation campaigns will only lead rational people to conclude that something smells rotten in the State of Denmark.
And a lack of concrete and plausible answers will only lead even rational people to speculate and imagine the worst.
Rush states: "U.S. diplomats in Libya were repeatedly denied enhanced security precautions by the Obama administration prior to the Sept. 11 attack on the consulate."
The "Other Rush" goes on to ask, "why would Stevens and his staff have been consigned to such a dangerous detail with horribly substandard protection, and repeatedly denied augmented security? In my view, this is the pertinent question, because it speaks far more to Obama’s duplicity and ruthlessness."
Why indeed? In that regard, Rush is right and once and for all, the American people deserve to know whether the man who is likely ineligible to sit in the Oval Office and has committed scores of impeachable offenses is also one of the greatest security threats to the United States.
Read more at:www.grasstopsusa.com
Are Libyan Ambassador Chris Stevens, Information Specialist Sean Smith and former Navy SEALS Glen Doherty and Tyrone Woods dead simply to satisfy one man's ego?
Were lives actually placed in peril simply to conceal from the American people that Barack Obama's proclaimed "Arab Spring" was an abject failure?
Is the leader of the free world that narcissistic... that self-absorbed? Is he simply an incompetent buffoon? Or... is the truth much worse?
The American people want answers. The American people deserve answers; and with Congressional hearings starting this week, the time to demand that Congress give us some REAL answers is now... before we step into the voting booth.
But The Obama Regime Isn't Simply Covering Up A "Policy Failure" ... What We Already Know Is Even More Shocking.
He lied to US and he apologized to OUR ENEMIES to SAVE HIS POLITICAL SKIN... and if Congress can't hold his feet to the fire this time around, then none of them deserve to be in office next year.
The fact that Team Obama knew Stevens literally had a target on his back and did nothing is not the issue. At issue is the fact that Team Obama continually downgraded Stevens' security as the threats against him became ever more apparent.
It's almost as if someone wanted Stevens dead.
Lt. Col. Andy Wood, a Green Beret with the Utah National Guard who headed the team assigned to protect Stevens and Libyan embassy personnel told CBS News that his sixteen man team and another six-man team were recalled from the embassy a month prior to the September 11th attack.
According to FOX News, Woods said "it was unbelievable to him that the State Department decreased security in Libya when it did, [after] he showed them how dangerous and volatile and unpredictable the entire environment in Libya was with at least 13 security incidents before September 11th backing up his case."
You read that right. AFTER multiple reports that Stevens' life was in jeopardy, Wood's unit and another unit assigned to protect Stevens were ordered back to the United States.
For those who asked why Stevens' security was so lax, there's the answer... an answer which raises far too many disturbing questions... questions that demand answers.
"Revealed: Jihadists Had Threatened To Kill Ambassador On FACEBOOK And The U.S. Consulate In Libya Was Attacked TWICE Before 9/11 Anniversary."
But Woods wasn't the only one sounding the alarm. If you didn't see the headline above, that's because it was carried by The Daily Mail in England on October 2nd.
The terrorists responsible for the attack on our consulate in Libya actually announced their intentions on Facebook (yeah... Facebook) beforehand and apparently, even Stevens had knowledge of the Facebook post.
According to The Daily Mail: "One such post mentioned the route that Stevens took on his morning jog, prompting the diplomat to briefly stop running for his own safety."
Requests for more security were ignored and FBI investigations into the incident were stonewalled under the premise that the "crime scene" wasn't safe.
Of course, safety issues didn't stop CNN reporters from picking up Stevens' diary from the rubble. Entries confirmed that Stevens knew he was in grave danger. And how did the Obama Regime react to CNN reporters doing the job it had refused to do. Philippe Reines, a State Department spokesman, called CNN's actions “indefensible.”
A reporter with The Daily Caller wrote: "considering my own encounter with the State Department and the way they’ve handled it — lying and stonewalling — it’s nauseating to watch them pontificate about ethics. To them, I’m just another 'bump in the road.' Literally."
Negligence that can't simply be attributed to gross incompetence? ... outrageous lies? ... stonewalling, cover-ups and refusals to investigate? ... there's much more going on here than meets the eye, and the American people need the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
It's Almost As If Someone Wanted Stevens Dead.
We know what people are thinking. An article by columnist Erik Rush, published by Canada Free Press, actually carried the headline: "Was Ambassador Stevens’ Death A Hit?"
Those who maintain suspicions can't be dismissed. Gross incompetence coupled with intricate and highly complex disinformation campaigns will only lead rational people to conclude that something smells rotten in the State of Denmark.
And a lack of concrete and plausible answers will only lead even rational people to speculate and imagine the worst.
Rush states: "U.S. diplomats in Libya were repeatedly denied enhanced security precautions by the Obama administration prior to the Sept. 11 attack on the consulate."
The "Other Rush" goes on to ask, "why would Stevens and his staff have been consigned to such a dangerous detail with horribly substandard protection, and repeatedly denied augmented security? In my view, this is the pertinent question, because it speaks far more to Obama’s duplicity and ruthlessness."
Why indeed? In that regard, Rush is right and once and for all, the American people deserve to know whether the man who is likely ineligible to sit in the Oval Office and has committed scores of impeachable offenses is also one of the greatest security threats to the United States.
Read more at:www.grasstopsusa.com