• If you are having problems logging in please use the Contact Us in the lower right hand corner of the forum page for assistance.

American Fifth Column

hypocritexposer

Well-known member
Lots of interesting information on this site, it's a must read. Also interesting is the connection to the "Agents" they have listed and the current administration. Obama has twice (that I know of) referred to the 5 "Pillars" in his speeches(Education & Economy), which is also a Muslim belief.

America has a growing enemy within. This enemy is referred to by experts as America’s Fifth Column. According to Encyclopedia Britannica, the term Fifth Column refers to “A clandestine group or faction of subversive agents who attempt to undermine a nation’s solidarity [unity] by any means at their disposal.”

Cloward-Piven Strategy
First proposed in 1966 and named after Columbia University sociologists Richard Andrew Cloward and Frances Fox Piven, the "Cloward-Piven Strategy" seeks to hasten the fall of capitalism by overloading the government bureaucracy with a flood of impossible demands, thus pushing society into crisis and economic collapse

http://www.basicsproject.org/american_fifth_column/goals/goals.htm

Methods of a Fifth Column
Britannica states that “A cardinal technique of the fifth column is the infiltration of sympathizers into the entire fabric of the nation under attack and, particularly, into positions of policy decision and national defense.”

Hidden in the Open
In a trusting society of decent people, the best place to hide such an agenda is right under their noses. Britannica explains that “From such key posts, fifth-column activists exploit the fears of a people by spreading rumors and misinformation, as well as by employing the more standard techniques of espionage and sabotage.”

Who is the American Fifth Column?
In short, members of the American fifth column can be identified by their open or disguised opposition to pro-American policies, principles or values. Agents of the fifth column can always be identified as those working to “undermine a nation’s solidarity [unity].”

This is not to be confused with those who openly dissent against policies easily demonstrated to be at odds with true American interests, such as the case with federal power grabs, attacks on individual rights, private property, free speech, religious expression or the 2nd Amendment.

Citizens who openly dissent against an over-reaching tyrannical government are patriots in the truest sense of the term. They are not members of a fifth column, quite the contrary.

It is those who work to undermine American freedom, individual rights, economic supremacy, military superiority, national sovereignty or security, or even just America’s image in the world, who are agents of a fifth column. Those who aid and abet America’s enemies by these means, be it from the halls of congress, the White House, the Judicial Branch, the media or the average Joe, are indeed agents of a fifth column.

Some are aware of the destructive nature of their actions and some are not. Some are leaders of a fifth column effort to undermine America, and others are unsuspecting “useful idiots” who believe they are doing the right thing, even though there is no real evidence to support that notion.

Saul Alinsky http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/03/24/AR2007032401152.html

William Ayers http://www.usnews.com/blogs/barone/2008/8/22/obama-needs-to-explain-his-ties-to-william-ayers.html

Roger Baldwin, founder of ACLU
David Brock, founder of Media Matters
Bernardine Dohrn
Crystal Eastman, anti military
Friedrich Engels
Gina Glantz, founding member America Votes
Antonio Gramsci
Harold M. Ickes, Co-founder and unofficial director of the Democrat Shadow Party

Vladimir I. Lenin
Georg Lukacs
Karl Marx
Cecile Richards, Planned Parenthood
Margaret Sanger-Hillary Clinton's hero http://snardfarker.ning.com/profiles/blogs/hillary-clinton-in-awe-of

George Soros
Josef Stalin
Leon Trotsky

http://www.basicsproject.org/american_fifth_column/individuals_agents.htm
 

RobertMac

Well-known member
The 2nd Amendment is where the line in the sand must be drawn...it was put into the Constitution so 'the people' could protect themselves from 'government'!!!!!!!
 

badaxemoo

Well-known member
hypocritexposer said:
Roger Baldwin, founder of ACLU
David Brock, founder of Media Matters
Bernardine Dohrn
Crystal Eastman, anti military
Friedrich Engels
Gina Glantz, founding member America Votes
Antonio Gramsci
Harold M. Ickes, Co-founder and unofficial director of the Democrat Shadow Party

Vladimir I. Lenin
Georg Lukacs
Karl Marx
Cecile Richards, Planned Parenthood
Margaret Sanger-Hillary Clinton's hero http://snardfarker.ning.com/profiles/blogs/hillary-clinton-in-awe-of

George Soros
Josef Stalin
Leon Trotsky

http://www.basicsproject.org/american_fifth_column/individuals_agents.htm

What is this list supposed to represent?
 

Steve

Well-known member
badaxemoo said:
hypocritexposer said:
Roger Baldwin, founder of ACLU
David Brock, founder of Media Matters
Bernardine Dohrn
Crystal Eastman, anti military
Friedrich Engels
Gina Glantz, founding member America Votes
Antonio Gramsci
Harold M. Ickes, Co-founder and unofficial director of the Democrat Shadow Party

Vladimir I. Lenin
Georg Lukacs
Karl Marx
Cecile Richards, Planned Parenthood
Margaret Sanger-Hillary Clinton's hero http://snardfarker.ning.com/profiles/blogs/hillary-clinton-in-awe-of

George Soros
Josef Stalin
Leon Trotsky

http://www.basicsproject.org/american_fifth_column/individuals_agents.htm

What is this list supposed to represent?

if you read the post it would indicate they are the ones who are leading the "fifth" column or ,...

“useful idiots”

on contrast to useless idiots.. or harmful, dangerous idiots,.. which is what I would more then likely have called the "list"...
 

hypocritexposer

Well-known member
In short, members of the American fifth column can be identified by their open or disguised opposition to pro-American policies, principles or values. Agents of the fifth column can always be identified as those working to “undermine a nation’s solidarity

Obviously some are past, some present. I have added a link to some, when I searched their names, to make it easier.

Hillary took a beat down in her confirmation hearings over her hero. (Sanger)

The website has the ideologies, their tactics, research papers etc.

Website has 2 sections for American haters. Radical Islam, and American Fifth Column, both based on history, ideologies, indoctrination etc.
 

badaxemoo

Well-known member
Steve said:
if you read the post it would indicate they are the ones who are leading the "fifth" column or ,...

“useful idiots”

on contrast to useless idiots.. or harmful, dangerous idiots,.. which is what I would more then likely have called the "list"...

I DID read your post.

That is why I asked the question.

That list is ridiculous.

There is really no thread that holds together the names on that list. The link goes to something that looks like something a random nut barfed onto the internets.

Lenin?
Sanger?
Ickes?

You clearly do a lot of reading.

I think you should spend a little more time choosing your reading material and then put in the effort to develop an actual understanding.

College can be helpful in that regard.
 

TexasBred

Well-known member
Maybe this will help explain them if you missed it on the link:

How do you tell a communist? Well, it's someone who reads Marx and Lenin. And how do you tell an anti-Communist? It's someone who understands Marx and Lenin.”
– Ronald Reagan
 

hypocritexposer

Well-known member
"American citizens need issue oriented informational resources which exclude special interest rhetoric."

Basics Project is a non-profit, non-partisan 501(c)(3) research and educational initiative whose mission is to re-introduce the American public to the basic elements of our constitutional heritage while providing non-partisan, fact-based information on relevant issues important to our country, specifically the threats of aggressive Islamofascism and the American Fifth Column.


Our Constitutional Literacy Program ensures that every American has the opportunity to understand the basic principles on which our country was founded, affording them the wherewithal to understand the value of freedom, liberty and our Constitutional Republic and the worth of our American Heritage providing a basic understanding of the contents of The Declaration of Independence, The US Constitution and The Bill of Rights, and a fundamental comprehension of why our Founders addressed each concern held within.

Our educational symposium series & issue research website, intended for the general public, serve as conduits to first-source, fact-based information from multiple vantage points on a variety of issues vital to our country, information designed to allow citizens to form their own educated opinions and to empower and encourage them to engage their governmental process armed with facts and truth.


http://www.basicsproject.org/about_us.htm
 

hypocritexposer

Well-known member
reader (the Second) said:
OMG, Badaxemoo, that was priceless.

:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

You have way too much time on your hands hypocrit. You should really put that curiosity to better use like going to the local community college and taking history and anthropology and political science courses and getting some mental discipline.

Reader, why not show everybody how intelligent you are and let us know how the names Badaxe listed ARE connected, on the website?

Here's a clue

Marx argued for a systemic understanding of socioeconomic change. On this model, it is the structural contradictions within capitalism which necessitate its end, giving way to communism

Sanger was a fervent Marxist, a radical feminist, and, despite comical denials posted on Planned Parenthood's website, a rabid eugenicist. ....the masthead of her Feminist-Socialist magazine, The Woman Rebel, defiantly proclaimed "No Gods! No Masters!" to its readership.

Working closely with Soros, Ickes personally helped launch six of the seven organizations that formed the Shadow Party’s core during the 2004 election, including America Coming Together, America Votes, the Center for American Progress, Joint Victory Campaign 2004, the Media Fund, and the Thunder Road Group.

Badaxe, why not use your superior knowledge to let us know what makes America great? And why the people on the total list are against it?

I hope both of you have the time, to share you vast knowledge and superior intellect with us all here. Both of you have been doing such a fine job so far!
 

MsSage

Well-known member
reader (the Second) said:
OMG, Badaxemoo, that was priceless.

:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

You have way too much time on your hands hypocrit. You should really put that curiosity to better use like going to the local community college and taking history and anthropology and political science courses and getting some mental discipline.
Just because he believes something different, you say he needs to go back to school and be taught by those who know more and can enlighten him.
I say you need to get out in the "real" world and talk to everyday people not you highly connected friends and college professors. You will find a different outlook and view of what is happening.
 

hypocritexposer

Well-known member
MsSage, that's one of the problems with Higher education isn't it. Badaxe and Reader are part of the problem, not the solution.

If either one of them wants to debate what is quoted below, go for it.

Many of today’s college professors are draft dodgers from the sixties. History is being re-written as we speak and it has been for many years now, from K - 12 and all the way through PhD.

Visit your local public school or college campus and listen to what our children are being taught. Compare that with the list of Socialist initiatives listed above for an eye opening experience.

http://www.basicsproject.org/american_fifth_column/indoctrination/indoctrination.htm

Exhaustively, the thesis of my series involves the essentials (religion, politics, economics and science) of the two competing Western worldview philosophies (liberal vs. conservative) and attempts to argue in favor of the American (or modern conservative) worldview philosophy. Modern liberalism, I have argued, is an alien philosophy with French and German roots via Rousseau, Hegel, Marx, Nietzsche, et. al.
 

Sandhusker

Well-known member
reader (the Second) said:
OMG, Badaxemoo, that was priceless.

:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

You have way too much time on your hands hypocrit. You should really put that curiosity to better use like going to the local community college and taking history and anthropology and political science courses and getting some mental discipline.

Yeah, Hypo. What he said! In your face! Neeeeaaahhhh!

If you're searching for a school, Reader can help you find one that teaches the differences between rights as spelled out in the Constitution and simple privileges..... or maybe not...... :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
 

hypocritexposer

Well-known member
Sunday, April 26, 2009
Obama's Cabinet: A Motley Crue of Misfits, Criminals and Incompetents
Who would have thought that after almost a hundred days, it would be Hillary Clinton that would be one of Obama's least controversial advisors? Of course, a cabinet, once referred to by the mainstream as a supreme collection of professionals, has turned into nothing short of a motley crue of misfits, criminals, and incompetents. In fact, the last of problematic cabinet choices is so large that I know that I will forget many important missteps in Obama's cabinet.

It all started when it was revealed that his original Commerce Secretary pick, Bill Richardson, was being investigated in a pay to play scheme. More recently, car czar, Steve Rattner, is also being investgated in his own pay to play scheme. These two are only the beginning of Obama's advisors that are caught up in legal and ethical scandals.

The most high profile of the missteps came with the nomination of Tim Geithner. Starting with the revelations about his own tax problems, the Treasury Secretary has become the butt of many jokes. His initial release of his four point economic plan was so vague that the market dropped several hundred points. Ever since, Geithner has struggled for the confidence of Wall Street, the beltway, and main street. Other lower profile nominees including Hilda Solis, Tom Daschle, Ron Kirk, Nancy Killefer, and Kathleen Sebelius have also been plagued by revelations of unpaid taxes. Both Killefer and Daschle ultimately had their nominations derailed as a result.

Kathleen Sebelius, yet to be confirmed, has also recently had to disclose that she initially under reported donations from Dr. George Tiller, a Kansas abortion doctor known for performing thousands of late term abortions. Then there is the nomination of Rosa Brooks, to a mid level post at the Pentagon. Brooks, most recently an L.A. Times columnists and Georgetown University professor, is known for not only her virulent anti Bush perspectives, but her equally virulent anti Israel stance and her connection to George Soros. Her last column called for a bailout for the newspapers.

Brooks wasn't the only questionable choice for a position on national security issues. The most high profile misstep came when Obama nominated Chas Freeman to head the National Intelligence Council. This position requires no confirmation and so it became nearly unprecedented when Freeman's name was withdrawn. Outcry came from many statements by Freeman that were also viewed as anti Israel, soft on China's record on civil rights, as well as his connections to the Saudi royal family.

Then, there is the Homeland Security Secretary, Janet Napolitano. She has made a series of her missteps that have even created a small amount of calls for her resignation. She drew the ire of the Canadians when she said that some of the 9/11 hijackers entered through Canada. She also inaccurately said that entering the country illegally is not a crime. Of course, her biggest gaffe was releasing a DHS report that singled out conservative "terrorists" including those returning from war.

There is also lesser known scandals involving second in command at HUD, Ron Sims and and the controversy surrounding Dawn Johnsen to head of the Office of Legal Counsel.
The scary thing is that most often the most scandalous events come from decisions cabinet members and advisors make while in office. The Obama administration has attained a stunningly large number of scandals largely before that can even occur. Imagine the scandal we are in for when this group of misfits, incompetents, and criminals actually has a chance to craft policy.
 

hopalong

Well-known member
Sandhusker said:
reader (the Second) said:
OMG, Badaxemoo, that was priceless.

:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

You have way too much time on your hands hypocrit. You should really put that curiosity to better use like going to the local community college and taking history and anthropology and political science courses and getting some mental discipline.

Yeah, Hypo. What he said! In your face! Neeeeaaahhhh!

If you're searching for a school, Reader can help you find one that teaches the differences between rights as spelled out in the Constitution and simple privileges..... or maybe not...... :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

Not to worry Reader will ask a cousin, a next door neighbor, an ex lover, the guy who runs the deli on her corner for the answer!! :roll: :roll:
You can BET she has tons of people she knows by thier first name in D.C.\ :roll: :roll: :roll:
 
Top