Sandhusker
Well-known member
reader (the Second) said:See the recent thread that Sandhusker put up about Orly Taitz where he cites only the small part of the article that appears to support his opinions but he forget conveniently to cite the bulk of the article which refutes his opinions and indeed his very way of thinking in the conspiracy vein. :wink:
This is what you all need to keep in mind when you read post after post that is either blatantly propaganda or is conveniently altered to suit Sandhusker or Mike's purposes.
I find it pathetic that they need to scour the Internet to find junk to post here and even then they have to accept posting incorrect or conveniently chopped stuff to support their fringe views.
You mean the recent thread where I SAID IT WAS AN EXCERPT FROM AN ARTICLE AND INCLUDED WHAT WEBSITE THE ARTICLE CAME FROM?
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
Man, I'm a sneaky devil............. :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: