• If you are having problems logging in please use the Contact Us in the lower right hand corner of the forum page for assistance.

And Another Thing - A Pointer

Sandhusker

Well-known member
reader (the Second) said:
See the recent thread that Sandhusker put up about Orly Taitz where he cites only the small part of the article that appears to support his opinions but he forget conveniently to cite the bulk of the article which refutes his opinions and indeed his very way of thinking in the conspiracy vein. :wink:

This is what you all need to keep in mind when you read post after post that is either blatantly propaganda or is conveniently altered to suit Sandhusker or Mike's purposes.

I find it pathetic that they need to scour the Internet to find junk to post here and even then they have to accept posting incorrect or conveniently chopped stuff to support their fringe views.

You mean the recent thread where I SAID IT WAS AN EXCERPT FROM AN ARTICLE AND INCLUDED WHAT WEBSITE THE ARTICLE CAME FROM?
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

Man, I'm a sneaky devil............. :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
 

hypocritexposer

Well-known member
And why is hypocritexposer so silent about these clear examples of hypocrisy?

Would you like me to quote the number of times I have asked people on here to provide links?

I can state that I also have a 100% record of checking the links provided and making up my own mind, and doing research on the issue, if I have doubts.
 

Sandhusker

Well-known member
First of all, I didn't post any opinion, unless you think that it is only my opinion that Obama and/or the DNC is spending money defending these lawsuits. Secondly, perhaps you could kindly post the parts that refuted that "opinion" as you accuse?

Just expose me, Reader. Show how underhanded I am.
 

Sandhusker

Well-known member
Reader, you called me out, at least have the backbone to back your allegations. What parts did I omit that refuted my opinion? Feel free to cut and paste to your liberal heart's content.
 

Sandhusker

Well-known member
reader (the Second) said:
I did not realize that you were incapable of reading a moderately long article and recognizing which parts you cut and paste and which parts you chose to not cite.

Good grief.

Ironic that you started a thread trying to damage my credibility, but yours is the one taking the hit.

You made an accusation. Back it.
 

Texan

Well-known member
reader (the Second) said:
I find it pathetic that they need to scour the Internet to find junk to post here and even then they have to accept posting incorrect or conveniently chopped stuff to support their fringe views.
Do you find it equally as pathetic when Oldtimer does the same thing?
 

Larrry

Well-known member
I find this post purely antagonistic at best and purely spiteful because someone disagrees with another poster
 
Top