• If you are having problems logging in please use the Contact Us in the lower right hand corner of the forum page for assistance.

Ann on Duke Rape Case

Mike

Well-known member
STRIPPER LIED ... WHITE BOYS FRIED
January 10, 2007


About a month after members of the Duke lacrosse team were falsely accused of raping a stripper last year, 88 members of the Duke faculty fanned the flames of hysteria by signing a letter announcing that they were "listening" to students "who know themselves to be objects of racism and sexism."

Maybe they should have been listening to the accused, several of whom had iron-clad alibis. Now the professors are going to need a new example of "racism and sexism" at Duke since their case in chief has turned out to be a fraud.

In lieu of a gang rape perpetrated by high-stepping white male athletes against a poor black woman, the Duke lacrosse case has turned out to be another in a long string of hoax hate crimes in which whites are falsely accused.

The lacrosse players denied that any rape had occurred and immediately submitted their DNA to the state, confident that the DNA would prove them innocent.

It did: Not a trace of DNA from any of the lacrosse players was found on the accuser, though this girl had more DNA in her than a refrigerator at a fertility clinic.

She had DNA from five other men, which ought to have raised suspicions about her story that she had not had sex with anyone for the week before the alleged gang rape. Well, that was one of the several versions of events the accuser has offered police to date, although my personal favorite was the one in which Elvis came back from the dead and sexually assaulted her. (I think that was version No. 3 — I'd have to check my notes.)

This is the second time this woman has accused a group of men of gang-raping her. One more time and it's officially considered a hobby.

And yet despite the vast privilege, untold wealth and bright shiny whiteness of the defendants, they are still under criminal indictment in this case. Three of the players face up to 30 years in prison for a crime every sane person knows they did not commit. Ah, the life of the privileged!

Duke English professor Cathy N. Davidson recently wrote an opinion piece defending her signing of the "listening" letter, noting that it was "not addressed to the police investigation," but rather "focused on racial and gender attitudes all too evident" after the alleged rape. She explained that the letter had merely "decried prejudice and inequality in the society at large."

This would be like defending a letter written during the Dreyfus affair on the grounds that the letter did not explicitly accuse Alfred Dreyfus of treason against France, but simply took the occasion of his arrest to decry the treasonable attitudes of the Jews in society at large.

If poor black women are constantly being raped by rich white men, then how about they produce one case?

Professor Davidson's column — written when it was clear to everyone except Nancy Grace that three innocent men were facing 30 years in prison for a rape they did not commit — notes that she remains "dismayed by the glaring social disparities implicit in what we know happened on March 13" and says the incident "underscores the appalling power dynamics of the situation."

OK, this one they made up, but the case still illustrates a larger truth!

If anything, our awareness of the "power dynamics of the situation" is too high. What we need is a little of that skepticism liberals bring to every single criminal case that is not a white-on-black crime or a rape case involving Bill Clinton.

The truth, as opposed to the larger truth, is that the allegedly powerful white males are at risk of losing their freedom at the hands of a lunatic accuser and a power-mad prosecutor. Meanwhile the allegedly powerless poor black woman has destroyed people's lives with her false accusations, for which she will walk away scot-free.

Don't liberals ever have to pony up at least one example of a powerful privileged white male trampling on the rights of a powerless black woman in order to keep droning on about powerful privileged white males? Every real-life example invariably turns out to be a hoax, among the most spectacular the Tawana Brawley case and now the Duke lacrosse case.

According to the Los Angeles Times — in an article about another hoax "hate crime" on a college campus — false reports of racist hate crimes on college campuses have averaged about one a year for 20 years.

Liberal professors believe that crying wolf is valuable for calling attention to the societal problem of wolves, even though there's never a wolf in any particular case. Evidently, awareness of an alleged societal ill — of which we have no actual examples — is worth ruining the lives of three innocent people. After all, they're just powerful white men.

At the next White Males of Privilege meeting, someone ought to bring up how they can use their vast power to win the right not to be put on trial for crimes they didn't commit.

COPYRIGHT 2007 ANN COULTER
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
This stupid D.A. finally got forced to ask the State AG for a "Special Prosecuter"....If what we read about this case is true- I'll bet they throw it out the door...
But if what we read is true, this Prosecuter should be hung out to dry- playing politics and the race vote with his prosecutional discretion....
 

Work Hard and Study Hard

Well-known member
Mike said:
STRIPPER LIED ... WHITE BOYS FRIED
January 10, 2007


About a month after members of the Duke lacrosse team were falsely accused of raping a stripper last year, 88 members of the Duke faculty fanned the flames of hysteria by signing a letter announcing that they were "listening" to students "who know themselves to be objects of racism and sexism."

Maybe they should have been listening to the accused, several of whom had iron-clad alibis. Now the professors are going to need a new example of "racism and sexism" at Duke since their case in chief has turned out to be a fraud.

In lieu of a gang rape perpetrated by high-stepping white male athletes against a poor black woman, the Duke lacrosse case has turned out to be another in a long string of hoax hate crimes in which whites are falsely accused.

The lacrosse players denied that any rape had occurred and immediately submitted their DNA to the state, confident that the DNA would prove them innocent.

It did: Not a trace of DNA from any of the lacrosse players was found on the accuser, though this girl had more DNA in her than a refrigerator at a fertility clinic.

She had DNA from five other men, which ought to have raised suspicions about her story that she had not had sex with anyone for the week before the alleged gang rape. Well, that was one of the several versions of events the accuser has offered police to date, although my personal favorite was the one in which Elvis came back from the dead and sexually assaulted her. (I think that was version No. 3 — I'd have to check my notes.)

This is the second time this woman has accused a group of men of gang-raping her. One more time and it's officially considered a hobby.

And yet despite the vast privilege, untold wealth and bright shiny whiteness of the defendants, they are still under criminal indictment in this case. Three of the players face up to 30 years in prison for a crime every sane person knows they did not commit. Ah, the life of the privileged!

Duke English professor Cathy N. Davidson recently wrote an opinion piece defending her signing of the "listening" letter, noting that it was "not addressed to the police investigation," but rather "focused on racial and gender attitudes all too evident" after the alleged rape. She explained that the letter had merely "decried prejudice and inequality in the society at large."

This would be like defending a letter written during the Dreyfus affair on the grounds that the letter did not explicitly accuse Alfred Dreyfus of treason against France, but simply took the occasion of his arrest to decry the treasonable attitudes of the Jews in society at large.

If poor black women are constantly being raped by rich white men, then how about they produce one case?

Professor Davidson's column — written when it was clear to everyone except Nancy Grace that three innocent men were facing 30 years in prison for a rape they did not commit — notes that she remains "dismayed by the glaring social disparities implicit in what we know happened on March 13" and says the incident "underscores the appalling power dynamics of the situation."

OK, this one they made up, but the case still illustrates a larger truth!

If anything, our awareness of the "power dynamics of the situation" is too high. What we need is a little of that skepticism liberals bring to every single criminal case that is not a white-on-black crime or a rape case involving Bill Clinton.

The truth, as opposed to the larger truth, is that the allegedly powerful white males are at risk of losing their freedom at the hands of a lunatic accuser and a power-mad prosecutor. Meanwhile the allegedly powerless poor black woman has destroyed people's lives with her false accusations, for which she will walk away scot-free.

Don't liberals ever have to pony up at least one example of a powerful privileged white male trampling on the rights of a powerless black woman in order to keep droning on about powerful privileged white males? Every real-life example invariably turns out to be a hoax, among the most spectacular the Tawana Brawley case and now the Duke lacrosse case.

According to the Los Angeles Times — in an article about another hoax "hate crime" on a college campus — false reports of racist hate crimes on college campuses have averaged about one a year for 20 years.

Liberal professors believe that crying wolf is valuable for calling attention to the societal problem of wolves, even though there's never a wolf in any particular case. Evidently, awareness of an alleged societal ill — of which we have no actual examples — is worth ruining the lives of three innocent people. After all, they're just powerful white men.

At the next White Males of Privilege meeting, someone ought to bring up how they can use their vast power to win the right not to be put on trial for crimes they didn't commit.

COPYRIGHT 2007 ANN COULTER

First off I would like to say that I never believed the black whore. Secondly I am a democrat. The gross generalization that goes on in this forum is appalling at best. From what i've witnessed the head hunt for the Duke boys was led by ONE man, the prosecuter. Ultimately justice has prevailed and i'm sure with the civil suits that will soon to be coming these poor young men will be able to "get back on their feet". Conservative talk radio either seems to have made many of you unable to think on your own or emboldened the ignorant amongst you to finally speak.
 

Cal

Well-known member
First off I would like to say that I never believed the black whore. Secondly I am a democrat. The gross generalization that goes on in this forum is appalling at best. From what i've witnessed the head hunt for the Duke boys was led by ONE man, the prosecuter. Ultimately justice has prevailed and i'm sure with the civil suits that will soon to be coming these poor young men will be able to "get back on their feet". Conservative talk radio either seems to have made many of you unable to think on your own or emboldened the ignorant amongst you to finally speak.

Where in this article is the word "Democrat" written?
 

jigs

Well-known member
Cal said:
First off I would like to say that I never believed the black whore. Secondly I am a democrat. The gross generalization that goes on in this forum is appalling at best. From what i've witnessed the head hunt for the Duke boys was led by ONE man, the prosecuter. Ultimately justice has prevailed and i'm sure with the civil suits that will soon to be coming these poor young men will be able to "get back on their feet". Conservative talk radio either seems to have made many of you unable to think on your own or emboldened the ignorant amongst you to finally speak.

Where in this article is the word "Democrat" written?

in my opinion the word democrat and whore are interchangeable ....

where is Jessie and Al in this case??? do they not care about a black woman, forced to earn a living on her back? surely this is a direct result of the oppression of the white man and she is still paying dues to the culture of the plantation lifestyle.
 

Steve

Well-known member
hardly
Secondly I am a democrat. The gross generalization that goes on in this forum is appalling at best.,... Conservative talk radio either seems to have made many of you unable to think on your own or emboldened the ignorant amongst you to finally speak.

yep,... your gross generalization on this forum is appalling,...maybe it's because your a democrat that you can't see it even when you typed it yourself?.....

as for the other uneducated uninformed comment from Hardly:
Ultimately justice has prevailed

kicked out of school....held up in front of the biased media as scum...labeled as racist rapist....awaiting still another date in court....possibly 30 years prison....sure sounds like justice prevailed agian.....
 

Mike

Well-known member
From what i've witnessed the head hunt for the Duke boys was led by ONE man, the prosecuter.


PLUS:


Jessie Jackson
Al Sharpton
The black leaders in the Prosecutors district
The local black community as a whole
The Board at the nearby Black College
 

IL Rancher

Well-known member
Your forgot about half the proffessors and administors as Duke itself Mike... That DA better loose his liscense over this... Talk about gross abuse of power.
 

Mike

Well-known member
IL Rancher said:
Your forgot about half the proffessors and administors as Duke itself Mike... That DA better loose his liscense over this... Talk about gross abuse of power.

You are correct......

I was just showing this dumbass that the DA was not the only one on board.
 

aplusmnt

Well-known member
People should loose Jobs and money over this event. I am not a big advocate of suing but if I was the kids I would sue the city, the school and anyone else I could make pay for it.

Also think the girl should have to do jail time for her crime. Maybe the at least the minimum time a rapist would have had to do.
 

IL Rancher

Well-known member
she could get in trouble for filling a false police report... She would get off probably because the DA led her down the line by the nose to the point of fixing police lineups.. Generally they don't want to make it any more difficult for victims of rape to report the crime.. They don't them to have the fear of being prosecuted if not enough evidence is gathered (the Duke case is different, I know) to get the conviction... Nope, the real problem is with the DA pressing charges when he did not have the evidence...


They probably won't sue because they want this thing to go away. Probably why the DA is still pressing the kidnapping charges as he thinks they will just settle to stay out of court (I think this was Sowell's opinion) in which case the DA can say that he got a conviction on some misdemeanor so obviously they were guilty and he was justified in going after them... He needs to be disbarred.
 

aplusmnt

Well-known member
IL Rancher said:
she could get in trouble for filling a false police report... She would get off probably because the DA led her down the line by the nose to the point of fixing police lineups.. Generally they don't want to make it any more difficult for victims of rape to report the crime.. They don't them to have the fear of being prosecuted if not enough evidence is gathered (the Duke case is different, I know) to get the conviction... Nope, the real problem is with the DA pressing charges when he did not have the evidence...


They probably won't sue because they want this thing to go away. Probably why the DA is still pressing the kidnapping charges as he thinks they will just settle to stay out of court (I think this was Sowell's opinion) in which case the DA can say that he got a conviction on some misdemeanor so obviously they were guilty and he was justified in going after them... He needs to be disbarred.

Good point, I was not thinking of how it would affect future victims that actually were raped. Shame that the girl can not be punished some how.

And I agree the DA should be disbarred!
 

Cal

Well-known member
jigs said:
Cal said:
First off I would like to say that I never believed the black whore. Secondly I am a democrat. The gross generalization that goes on in this forum is appalling at best. From what i've witnessed the head hunt for the Duke boys was led by ONE man, the prosecuter. Ultimately justice has prevailed and i'm sure with the civil suits that will soon to be coming these poor young men will be able to "get back on their feet". Conservative talk radio either seems to have made many of you unable to think on your own or emboldened the ignorant amongst you to finally speak.

Where in this article is the word "Democrat" written?

in my opinion the word democrat and whore are interchangeable ....

where is Jessie and Al in this case??? do they not care about a black woman, forced to earn a living on her back? surely this is a direct result of the oppression of the white man and she is still paying dues to the culture of the plantation lifestyle.
Thanks for pointing this obvious association out. It just seemed to me that WHSH was trying to scheme some "victim points" by association when Dem wasn't actually mentioned, unless he has something else in common with the accuser, such as false reportings of being gang raped by young white males.
 

nr

Well-known member
The DA should be thankful. Thankful that one of the students didn't commit suicide during all the media attention.
 

schnurrbart

Well-known member
jigs said:
Cal said:
First off I would like to say that I never believed the black whore. Secondly I am a democrat. The gross generalization that goes on in this forum is appalling at best. From what i've witnessed the head hunt for the Duke boys was led by ONE man, the prosecuter. Ultimately justice has prevailed and i'm sure with the civil suits that will soon to be coming these poor young men will be able to "get back on their feet". Conservative talk radio either seems to have made many of you unable to think on your own or emboldened the ignorant amongst you to finally speak.

Where in this article is the word "Democrat" written?

in my opinion the word democrat and whore are interchangeable ....

where is Jessie and Al in this case??? do they not care about a black woman, forced to earn a living on her back? surely this is a direct result of the oppression of the white man and she is still paying dues to the culture of the plantation lifestyle.

And I think your ?handle? is racist and bigoted. If you believe ANYTHING coulter says, you're an idiot. I think the woman probably figured she could get a little money with a settlement to keep it quiet and it got out of hand. I think something happened to her that night but probably not what she said and certainly not with the three she picked out. But just because coulter says something doesn't make it anything but venomous.
 

Mike

Well-known member
And I think your ?handle? is racist and bigoted. If you believe ANYTHING coulter says, you're an idiot.

I doubt very seriously that Jigs gives a **** what you think. :lol:
Wouldn't blame him either.

Another thing, Ann Coulter has more balls than you do, I'm sure. At least some of her rants are actually researched instead of just liberal slime.
 

movin' on

Well-known member
What's wrong with his handle? I have heard jigs say some things I didn't agree with, but I guess I don't get what's wrong with "jigs"
 
Top