• If you are having problems logging in please use the Contact Us in the lower right hand corner of the forum page for assistance.

Ann

Mike

Well-known member
If Only Bin Laden Had a Stained Blue Dress...
HUMAN EVENT ^ | 09/13/2006 | By Ann Coulter


Posted on 09/13/2006 3:41:07 PM PDT by oxcart


If you wonder why it took 50 years to get the truth about Joe McCarthy, consider the fanatical campaign of the Clinton acolytes to kill an ABC movie that relies on the 9/11 Commission Report, which whitewashed only 90 percent of Clinton's cowardice and incompetence in the face of terrorism, rather than 100 percent.

Islamic jihadists attacked America year after year throughout the Clinton administration. They did everything but blow up his proverbial "bridge to the 21st century." Every year but one, Clinton found an excuse not to fight back.

The first month Clinton was in office, Islamic terrorists with suspected links to al-Qaida and Saddam Hussein bombed the World Trade Center.

For the first time ever, a terrorist act against America was treated not as a matter of national security, but exclusively as a simple criminal offense. The individual bombers were tried in a criminal court. (The one plotter who got away fled to Iraq, that peaceful haven of kite-flying children until Bush invaded and turned it into a nation of dangerous lunatics.)

In 1995 and 1996, various branches of the Religion of Peace -- al-Qaida, Hezbollah and the Iranian "Party of God" -- staged car bomb attacks on American servicemen in Saudi Arabia, killing 24 members of our military in all. Each time, the Clinton administration came up with an excuse to do nothing.

Despite the Democrats' current claim that only the capture of Osama bin Laden will magically end terrorism forever, Clinton turned down Sudan's offer to hand us bin Laden in 1996. That year, Mohammed Atta proposed the 9/11 attack to bin Laden.

Clinton refused the handover of bin Laden because -- he said in taped remarks on Feb. 15, 2002 -- "(bin Laden) had committed no crime against America, so I did not bring him here because we had no basis on which to hold him." Luckily, after 9/11, we can get him on that trespassing charge.

Although Clinton made the criminal justice system the entire U.S. counterterrorism strategy, there was not even an indictment filed after the bombing of either Khobar Towers (1996) or the USS Cole (2000). Indictments were not filed until after Bush/Ashcroft came into office.

Only in 1998 did the Clinton-haters ("normal people") force Clinton into a military response. Solely because of the Monica Lewinsky scandal, Clinton finally lobbed a few bombs in the general direction of Saddam Hussein and Osama bin Laden.

In August 1998, three days after Clinton admitted to the nation that he did in fact have "sex with that woman," he bombed Afghanistan and Sudan, doing about as much damage as another Clinton fusillade did to a blue Gap dress.

The day of Clinton's scheduled impeachment, Dec. 18, 1998, he bombed Iraq. This accomplished two things: (1) It delayed his impeachment for one day, and (2) it got a lot of Democrats on record about the monumental danger of Saddam Hussein and his weapons of mass destruction.

So don't tell me impeachment "distracted" Clinton from his aggressive pursuit of terrorists. He never would have bombed anyone if it weren't for the Clinton-haters.

As soon as Clinton was no longer "distracted" by impeachment, he went right back to doing nothing in response to terrorism. In October 2000, al-Qaida bombed the USS Cole, killing 17 sailors and nearly sinking the ship.

Clinton did nothing. This is only an abbreviated list of Clinton's surrender to Islamic savagery. For a president who supposedly stayed up all night "working" and hated vacations, Clinton sure spent a lot of time sitting around on his butt while America was being attacked.

According to Rich Miniter, author of "Losing Bin Laden," Clinton's top national security advisers made the following classic Democrat excuses for doing nothing in response to the Cole attack:

* Attorney General Janet Reno "thought retaliation might violate international law and was therefore against it." * CIA Director George Tenet "wanted more definitive proof that bin Laden was behind the attack, although he personally thought he was." * Secretary of State Madeleine Albright "was concerned about the reaction of world opinion to a retaliation against Muslims and the impact it would have in the final days of the Clinton Middle East peace process." (How did that turn out, by the way? Big success, I take it? Everybody over there all friendly with one another?) * Secretary of Defense William Cohen "did not consider the Cole attack 'sufficient provocation' for a military retaliation."

Less than a year after Clinton's final capitulation to Islamic terrorists, they staged the largest terrorist attack in history on U.S. soil. The Sept. 11 attack, planning for which began in the '90s, followed eight months of President Bush -- but eight years of Bill Clinton.

Clinton's own campaign adviser on Iraq, Laurie Mylroie, says Clinton and his advisers are "most culpable" for the intelligence failure that allowed 9/11 to happen.

Now, after five years of no terrorist attacks in America, Democrats are hoping we'll forget the consequences of the Democrat strategy of doing nothing in response to terrorism and abandon the Bush policies that have kept this nation safe since 9/11. But first, they need to rewrite history.
 

don

Well-known member
quote: The first month Clinton was in office, Islamic terrorists with suspected links to al-Qaida and Saddam Hussein bombed the World Trade Center

then wouldn't this reflect on ghwb?
 

Mike

Well-known member
don said:
quote: The first month Clinton was in office, Islamic terrorists with suspected links to al-Qaida and Saddam Hussein bombed the World Trade Center

then wouldn't this reflect on ghwb?

One could maybe stretch it out and wonder if it reflected on Pee Wee Herman also. :roll:
 

don

Well-known member
well if clinton is responsible for bin laden a year into gwb wouldn't ghwb be responsible for al qaida a month into clinton's admin? ann has made a mint out of telling people they like to hear. i wonder how much of it she believes.
 

passin thru

Well-known member
don, I know you must be a smart man but golly gee.............................please tell me you are trying to be funny. There has to a rational explanation for your assumption and a try at comedy is the only thing that a rational person can deduce.

When I saw this post I wondered how many posts would happen before an Ann attack would occur. I guessed three and set back and waited.....................BINGO
 

don

Well-known member
well all the republicans are blaming clinton for not taking care of bin laden so i'm just wondering why bush senior didn't have a better handle on al-qaida. ann is the one who pointed it out.
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
don said:
well all the republicans are blaming clinton for not taking care of bin laden so i'm just wondering why bush senior didn't have a better handle on al-qaida. ann is the one who pointed it out.

Just like prior to Dec 7, 1941, the American public was sitting fat and happy at home- refused to recognize the threat and did not want to get involved as long as it wasn't on home grounds....Clintons crime is that all thru his terms, even tho he was being advised of the true danger- he cut intelligence, military, and preparedness funding and manpower, which may have given him or GW the ability to stop the 9/11 attack......
 

jigs

Well-known member
in the 8 years of Clinton he cut from our military enough men and weapons andships/tanks/missles/planes/ and subs to be something like the 4th largest fighting force in the world...... I would have to dig a while to find the paper I recieved on this, but I bet I could find it.


Bill was using the 8 years in office to line his pockets, soak up the glory and sell out his country.

hang him, and his old lady too
 

Steve

Well-known member
well all the republicans are blaming clinton for not taking care of bin laden so i'm just wondering why bush senior didn't have a better handle on al-qaida.

first a few facts.....

"ON SEPTEMBER 1, 1992, Ramzi Yousef arrived at JFK airport. He presented an Iraqi passport without a U.S. visa, was briefly detained (and fingerprinted) for illegal entry, and granted asylum pending a hearing."

" INS holding cells were overcrowded and Yousef, claiming political asylum, was given a hearing date."

"Although the principal conspirators had been in place since September, it was not until after the U.S. elections on November 3 that Yousef began to prepare the World Trade Center bomb. In mid-November the first of many calls to chemical companies appears on his phone bills. At the same time, Yousef also began calling surgical supply companies for the gloves, masks, and rubber tubing he needed to make the bomb."

"On November 9, 1992, just after the final green light for the bombing had been given, Yousef reported to Jersey City., police that he had lost his passport. He claimed to be Abdul Basit Mahmud Abdul Karim, a Pakistani born and reared in Kuwait. Then, between December 3 and December 27, Yousef made a number of calls to Baluchistan. Several of them were conference calls to a few key numbers, a geographical plotting of which suggests that they were related to Yousef's probable escape route--through Pakistani and Iranian Baluchistan--across the Arabian Sea to Oman, after which the "telephone trail" ends. After Yousef s arrest, a National Security Council staffer confirmed to me that Yousef had indeed fled from the United States through Baluchistan.."
http://www.fas.org/irp/world/iraq/956-tni.htm

"In 1995, investigative journalist Steven Emerson noted that federal investigators had identified links between the WTC bombers and at least five Islamic organizations: the Gama al-Islamiya, Islamic Jihad, Hamas, the Sudanese National Islamic Front, and al-Fuqrah.."

"Osama bin Laden, widely believed to have been the mastermind of the August 1998 attacks on the U.S. embassies in Kenya and Tanzania, would seem a natural candidate to support the WTC bombing, but to date none of the government indictments against him indicate a connection to the incident.."
http://cns.miis.edu/pubs/reports/wtc93.htm


In the course of the trial it was revealed that the FBI had an informant, an Egyptian man named Emad A. Salem, a former Egyptian army officer. Salem claims to have informed the FBI of the plot to bomb the towers as early as February 6, 1992. Salem's role as informant allowed the FBI to quickly pinpoint the conspirators out of the hundreds of possible suspects.
http://www.answers.com/topic/world-trade-center-bombing.

so in fact, Yousef, was never in contact with or affiliated with Osama, his uncle Shiek Kahlied Mohammed went to Osama after Yousef was captured, and furthered Yousef's plan....

facts show Yousef planned the first attack right under the INS and FBI's noses.....was Bush sr informed? we are not sure, ...but I would honestly say that the first hint of a problem was on November 4, 1979

the only thing I know as fact is that Terrorist operated with no hindrence for over 20 years....and we paid the price.. ......
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
don said:
ann has made a mint out of telling people they like to hear. i wonder how much of it she believes.
That's a big difference in conservatives and liberals. Liberals don't have to believe something just because they say it. You can bet your ass that if AC says it, she believes it. And also, if she believes something, she sure as hell don't mind saying it, either. :lol:
 

Mike

Well-known member
I see where "Air America" has gone bankrupt and is left owing Al Franken a pile of money. Poor guy! :lol: :lol:
 

Bob_Frapples

Well-known member
I am neither for or against AC,but,I do not see how her written words can possibly have any integrity left.Her word's can no longer be trusted as fact,or even as her's.After being exposed as a sloppy,plagiaristic informer of the public,should her words not be questioned? If she was to hold herself up to the same scrutiny she does others,she would of asked herself to step down,and,to let another do her job.
 

passin thru

Well-known member
Bob said:
I am neither for or against AC,
BUT
Bob said:
I do not see how her written words can possibly have any integrity left.Her word's can no longer be trusted as fact,or even as her's.After being exposed as a sloppy,plagiaristic informer of the public,should her words not be questioned? If she was to hold herself up to the same scrutiny she does others,she would of asked herself to step down,and,to let another do her job.

That BUTwill get you every time. Now that is talking out of both sides of your mouth. Boy you sure put the camo on in the first part but stripped completely bare in the second part.

On the Air America, I hate to see it go under. Two things, I like to know what these radicals are thinking and I use the word "thinking" lightly. And second you will see an assault on right radio like you have never seen if AA goes under. There will be call for the gov to step in and silence the right like we have never seen before. Besides when these people talk................their true colors show..............the camo comes off so to speak.
 

Hanta Yo

Well-known member
jigs said:
in the 8 years of Clinton he cut from our military enough men and weapons andships/tanks/missles/planes/ and subs to be something like the 4th largest fighting force in the world...... I would have to dig a while to find the paper I recieved on this, but I bet I could find it.


Bill was using the 8 years in office to line his pockets, soak up the glory and sell out his country.

hang him, and his old lady too



WOW :shock: :shock: That was GOOD :!:
 

Tap

Well-known member
I am neither for or against AC,but,I do not see how her written words can possibly have any integrity left.Her word's can no longer be trusted as fact,or even as her's.After being exposed as a sloppy,plagiaristic informer of the public,should her words not be questioned? If she was to hold herself up to the same scrutiny she does others,she would of asked herself to step down,and,to let another do her job.

Bob, people on the losing side of an argument sometimes attack the charcater of their opponenents, trying to discredit them. I think that is probably the case with Ann's detractors here. Show me the evidence of her copying others work. She is so damn sharp that she does not need to copy others. Have you seen her dabate on TV, where that would be impossible?

Maybe we should start to send folks to jail simply when they are accused of a crime. But the liberals would only go for that if there was a conservative accused. :wink:
 

Latest posts

Top