• If you are having problems logging in please use the Contact Us in the lower right hand corner of the forum page for assistance.

Another Giveaway? The Sad Truth about the Geithner TALF Plan

hypocritexposer

Well-known member
Another Giveaway? The Sad Truth about the Geithner TALF Plan
By: Ian Welsh Monday March 16, 2009 2:47 pm

by Admit One

This may sound a little hyperbolic, but my jaw did drop when I read Obama Economic Advisor Anna Burger's succinct description of Geithner's plan for convincing private investors to buy up assets:

Secretary Geithner's proposal for the Term Asset-Backed Securities Loan Facility (TALF) would enable private equity firms and hedge funds to buy up higher quality loan securitizations, including auto, consumer, student and small business loans. The Federal government would provide low-cost financing for up to 95% of the purchase price, with private firms putting down as little as 5% and the securitizations as collateral. The hope is then to expand this proposal to include toxic mortgage-backed securities.

Each of these programs could cost taxpayers up to $1 trillion. If the private firms make a profit from the deal, they keep all of it. If they end up losing money, they are only on the hook for the nickel or two of equity they put in. The taxpayers would then assume the rest of the losses. Even worse, subsidizing the purchase up to 19-to-1 will drive up the price of the assets...

There is no reason to do this. If the government is providing 95% of the money, the government might as well provide 100% of the money and just take the profit as well as the risk. Under Geithner's plan, the government accepts all the risk and none of the profits and puts up almost all of the money?

This is ideology run rampant at the cost of common sense. What conceivable reason would Geithner have to pitch something like this? Could it be because he doesn't believe government should make a profit, or that private investors should take losses? Or, worse than that. .

http://firedoglake.com/
 

hypocritexposer

Well-known member
If Obama doesn't like Geithner's deal, why didn't he stop it before it went through?

AIG had a dealine of Sunday March 15 to pay out $165 million in bonuses to its Financial Products Division, but that was only a portion of the $450 that they are scheduled to receive this year. Geithner knew about this, so he struck a deal with AIG:

http://firedoglake.com/2009/03/16/if-obama-didnt-like-geithners-aig-bonus-deal-why-didnt-he-stop-it/
 
Top