• If you are having problems logging in please use the Contact Us in the lower right hand corner of the forum page for assistance.

Another Moonbat?

Texan

Well-known member
Not sure if this is the right place for this...

http://www.wmcstations.com/Global/story.asp?S=10042102

Maybe it should be on the Horses and Dogs board? :lol:
 

Sandhusker

Well-known member
What's the problem with a man and dog having sex as long as they're in love? For that matter, what's wrong with them getting married? Who are you to say what two loving beings can and can't do?
 

Texan

Well-known member
I suppose I'm deserving of that public rebuke, Sandhusker. :oops: I wasn't thinking about the "love" aspect of the situation. I thought it was just some sort of promiscuous behavior done only for fun.

Now that you have shown me where I'm wrong, I fully support this guy's right to marry the dog AND the horse. And maybe one day he can grow up to be the Chairman of some powerful House committee. :lol:
 

CattleArmy

Well-known member
Sandhusker said:
What's the problem with a man and dog having sex as long as they're in love? For that matter, what's wrong with them getting married? Who are you to say what two loving beings can and can't do?

You have to be kidding me. You are just full of sarcasm today aren't you?
 

Mike

Well-known member
For the Love of God, Nobody Mention To Her That Wednesday is Humpday
Mar 13, 2009
Politics & Current Events, WTF?

Via Jonathan Turley, I encountered the elsewhere-freakish but Florida-mundane story of state senator Larcenia Bullard (D-Miami). Bullard became agitated during a Florida legislative debate over a bestiality law. Florida does not have a current bestiality law, apparently. I’m not entirely sure, based on my familiarity with Florida, that this is a bad thing; I’m not sure that they should be excluding some of the smarter animals from their potential gene pool.

Anyway, Bullard became agitated when someone used the term “animal husbandry”:

Rich’s legislation would target only those who derived or helped others derive ‘’sexual gratification” from an animal, specifying that conventional dog-judging contests and animal-husbandry practices are permissible.

That last provision tripped up Miami Democratic Sen. Larcenia Bullard.

”People are taking these animals as their husbands? What’s husbandry?” she asked. Some senators stifled their laughter as Sen. Charlie Dean, an Inverness Republican, explained that husbandry is raising and caring for animals. Bullard didn’t get it.

”So that maybe was the reason the lady was so upset about that monkey?” Bullard asked, referring to a Connecticut case where a woman’s suburban chimpanzee went mad and was shot.
I'll let you guess Senator Larcenia's color. :lol: :lol:
 

CattleArmy

Well-known member
Texan said:
I suppose I'm deserving of that public rebuke, Sandhusker. :oops: I wasn't thinking about the "love" aspect of the situation. I thought it was just some sort of promiscuous behavior done only for fun.

Now that you have shown me where I'm wrong, I fully support this guy's right to marry the dog AND the horse. And maybe one day he can grow up to be the Chairman of some powerful House committee. :lol:


Texan nice to see you back even when you are posting just to get a good argument out of me. :D

Here's the question fellas were the horse and the dog of adult age and were they willing participents in the act? I'm doubting they were willing. Both yourself and Sandhusker take this a bit far and I throw this question out there are animals capable of the emotion of love? Isn't different species sex just a whole nother can of worms to open? Wouldn't this fall more in a rape discussion then a gay one?

I know you two are against gay marriage. I know you view it as some big sin in the Bible. When in fact a sin is a sin. It's man who thinks there is this rating level for sin when in fact sins sin. I support gay marriage fully when it happens between to consenting consentual of age ADULTS. We live in a society that lacks the responsibility or need to commit. Heterosexuals are even lacking opting to live together and raise children. I'm thrilled when people want to commit to one another. You two should be to as your so scared all this sinning is out there going on.


So let's go back to the issue at hand some wackjob raped a horse and a dog. Rape is wrong wether it's a man raping another man, a woman, a horse, or a dog.
 

aplusmnt

Well-known member
CattleArmy said:
Texan said:
I suppose I'm deserving of that public rebuke, Sandhusker. :oops: I wasn't thinking about the "love" aspect of the situation. I thought it was just some sort of promiscuous behavior done only for fun.

Now that you have shown me where I'm wrong, I fully support this guy's right to marry the dog AND the horse. And maybe one day he can grow up to be the Chairman of some powerful House committee. :lol:


Texan nice to see you back even when you are posting just to get a good argument out of me. :D

Here's the question fellas were the horse and the dog of adult age and were they willing participents in the act? I'm doubting they were willing. Both yourself and Sandhusker take this a bit far and I throw this question out there are animals capable of the emotion of love? Isn't different species sex just a whole nother can of worms to open? Wouldn't this fall more in a rape discussion then a gay one?

I know you two are against gay marriage. I know you view it as some big sin in the Bible. When in fact a sin is a sin. It's man who thinks there is this rating level for sin when in fact sins sin. I support gay marriage fully when it happens between to consenting consentual of age ADULTS. We live in a society that lacks the responsibility or need to commit. Heterosexuals are even lacking opting to live together and raise children. I'm thrilled when people want to commit to one another. You two should be to as your so scared all this sinning is out there going on.


So let's go back to the issue at hand some wackjob raped a horse and a dog. Rape is wrong wether it's a man raping another man, a woman, a horse, or a dog.

Maybe the horse and dog enjoyed it, how you know it was rape? :lol:
 

CattleArmy

Well-known member
Mike said:
I support gay marriage fully when it happens between to consenting consentual of age ADULTS.

How about if the two consenting were both your brothers?


Hetersosexuals aren't allowed to marry family either. A whole new door opens with incest. See you guys go so far left in trying to be right sometimes.
 

Mike

Well-known member
CattleArmy said:
Mike said:
I support gay marriage fully when it happens between to consenting consentual of age ADULTS.

How about if the two consenting were both your brothers?


Hetersosexuals aren't allowed to marry family either. A whole new door opens with incest. See you guys go so far left in trying to be right sometimes.

The line has to be established somewhere.

I thought you wanted adult, consensual adults to be free of any social bondages?

Now YOU are the one backtracking......by picking and choosing what is right or wrong. :roll: :roll: :roll:
 

aplusmnt

Well-known member
CattleArmy said:
Mike said:
I support gay marriage fully when it happens between to consenting consentual of age ADULTS.

How about if the two consenting were both your brothers?


Hetersosexuals aren't allowed to marry family either. A whole new door opens with incest. See you guys go so far left in trying to be right sometimes.

What is wrong with incest, why can it not be acceptable? Wouldn't the two people be consenting adults, no rape involved? Are you saying incest is wrong because it goes against Christian values? Is that not why it was outlawed based on Biblical reasoning?
 

alice

Well-known member
aplusmnt said:
CattleArmy said:
Mike said:
How about if the two consenting were both your brothers?


Hetersosexuals aren't allowed to marry family either. A whole new door opens with incest. See you guys go so far left in trying to be right sometimes.

What is wrong with incest, why can it not be acceptable? Wouldn't the two people be consenting adults, no rape involved? Are you saying incest is wrong because it goes against Christian values? Is that not why it was outlawed based on Biblical reasoning?

It was "outlawed" because incest/intermarrying caused/causes birth defects...mental retardation, etc.

Alice
 

Mike

Well-known member
alice said:
aplusmnt said:
CattleArmy said:
Hetersosexuals aren't allowed to marry family either. A whole new door opens with incest. See you guys go so far left in trying to be right sometimes.

What is wrong with incest, why can it not be acceptable? Wouldn't the two people be consenting adults, no rape involved? Are you saying incest is wrong because it goes against Christian values? Is that not why it was outlawed based on Biblical reasoning?

It was "outlawed" because incest/intermarrying caused/causes birth defects...mental retardation, etc.

Alice

It's plain, clear, and obvious you don't know anything about "Linebreeding". :roll: :roll: :roll:
 

alice

Well-known member
Mike said:
alice said:
aplusmnt said:
What is wrong with incest, why can it not be acceptable? Wouldn't the two people be consenting adults, no rape involved? Are you saying incest is wrong because it goes against Christian values? Is that not why it was outlawed based on Biblical reasoning?

It was "outlawed" because incest/intermarrying caused/causes birth defects...mental retardation, etc.

Alice

It's plain, clear, and obvious you don't know anything about "Linebreeding". :roll: :roll: :roll:

Obviously you've never worked with children that are the result of incest, thank GAWD!!!!! I can just imagine how you'd speak to them...and how you'd joke behind their backs.

Alice
 

Mike

Well-known member
alice said:
Mike said:
alice said:
It was "outlawed" because incest/intermarrying caused/causes birth defects...mental retardation, etc.

Alice

It's plain, clear, and obvious you don't know anything about "Linebreeding". :roll: :roll: :roll:

Obviously you've never worked with children that are the result of incest, thank GAWD!!!!! I can just imagine how you'd speak to them...and how you'd joke behind their backs.

Alice

The subject was CA's two brothers intermarrying. My question is how could they reproduce?????? The Linebreeding statement was a joke based on this staement by CA.

The reason for intermarrying is not physical defects, it's morally taboo:

http://www.umanitoba.ca/faculties/arts/anthropology/tutor/marriage/usa-ncst.html
 

aplusmnt

Well-known member
alice said:
aplusmnt said:
CattleArmy said:
Hetersosexuals aren't allowed to marry family either. A whole new door opens with incest. See you guys go so far left in trying to be right sometimes.

What is wrong with incest, why can it not be acceptable? Wouldn't the two people be consenting adults, no rape involved? Are you saying incest is wrong because it goes against Christian values? Is that not why it was outlawed based on Biblical reasoning?

It was "outlawed" because incest/intermarrying caused/causes birth defects...mental retardation, etc.

Alice

What about Gay incest, no birth defects going to happen between two brothers who want to marry? Or two sisters? So we going to have Gay Incest legal but not Heterosexual incest?
 

aplusmnt

Well-known member
alice said:
Mike said:
alice said:
It was "outlawed" because incest/intermarrying caused/causes birth defects...mental retardation, etc.

Alice

It's plain, clear, and obvious you don't know anything about "Linebreeding". :roll: :roll: :roll:

Obviously you've never worked with children that are the result of incest, thank GAWD!!!!! I can just imagine how you'd speak to them...and how you'd joke behind their backs.

Alice

Once again you avoid the issue and attack the messenger. Typical play for a Social Simpleton!
 

CattleArmy

Well-known member
aplusmnt said:
CattleArmy said:
Mike said:
How about if the two consenting were both your brothers?


Hetersosexuals aren't allowed to marry family either. A whole new door opens with incest. See you guys go so far left in trying to be right sometimes.

What is wrong with incest, why can it not be acceptable? Wouldn't the two people be consenting adults, no rape involved? Are you saying incest is wrong because it goes against Christian values? Is that not why it was outlawed based on Biblical reasoning?

Honestly I don't care if you f*** a chicken. I think society itself would take care of problems like these where it crosses species lines. Little peer pressure and animals might not seem so appealing.

To ask why people can't be involved in incest is just grasping at straws because you have nothing else to type today.


"Promoting hatred and bigotry in the name of God is what destroys society, not the marriage of two loving people of the same gender." Raymond Miller.
 

Larrry

Well-known member
My dad always told me that when someone does something for another person and they constantly keep telling everyone what they did, the action was for their benefit and not the recipient of this action.
 
Top