Sandhusker said:What's the problem with a man and dog having sex as long as they're in love? For that matter, what's wrong with them getting married? Who are you to say what two loving beings can and can't do?
I'll let you guess Senator Larcenia's color. :lol: :lol:For the Love of God, Nobody Mention To Her That Wednesday is Humpday
Mar 13, 2009
Politics & Current Events, WTF?
Via Jonathan Turley, I encountered the elsewhere-freakish but Florida-mundane story of state senator Larcenia Bullard (D-Miami). Bullard became agitated during a Florida legislative debate over a bestiality law. Florida does not have a current bestiality law, apparently. I’m not entirely sure, based on my familiarity with Florida, that this is a bad thing; I’m not sure that they should be excluding some of the smarter animals from their potential gene pool.
Anyway, Bullard became agitated when someone used the term “animal husbandry”:
Rich’s legislation would target only those who derived or helped others derive ‘’sexual gratification” from an animal, specifying that conventional dog-judging contests and animal-husbandry practices are permissible.
That last provision tripped up Miami Democratic Sen. Larcenia Bullard.
”People are taking these animals as their husbands? What’s husbandry?” she asked. Some senators stifled their laughter as Sen. Charlie Dean, an Inverness Republican, explained that husbandry is raising and caring for animals. Bullard didn’t get it.
”So that maybe was the reason the lady was so upset about that monkey?” Bullard asked, referring to a Connecticut case where a woman’s suburban chimpanzee went mad and was shot.
Texan said:I suppose I'm deserving of that public rebuke, Sandhusker.I wasn't thinking about the "love" aspect of the situation. I thought it was just some sort of promiscuous behavior done only for fun.
Now that you have shown me where I'm wrong, I fully support this guy's right to marry the dog AND the horse. And maybe one day he can grow up to be the Chairman of some powerful House committee. :lol:
CattleArmy said:Texan said:I suppose I'm deserving of that public rebuke, Sandhusker.I wasn't thinking about the "love" aspect of the situation. I thought it was just some sort of promiscuous behavior done only for fun.
Now that you have shown me where I'm wrong, I fully support this guy's right to marry the dog AND the horse. And maybe one day he can grow up to be the Chairman of some powerful House committee. :lol:
Texan nice to see you back even when you are posting just to get a good argument out of me.![]()
Here's the question fellas were the horse and the dog of adult age and were they willing participents in the act? I'm doubting they were willing. Both yourself and Sandhusker take this a bit far and I throw this question out there are animals capable of the emotion of love? Isn't different species sex just a whole nother can of worms to open? Wouldn't this fall more in a rape discussion then a gay one?
I know you two are against gay marriage. I know you view it as some big sin in the Bible. When in fact a sin is a sin. It's man who thinks there is this rating level for sin when in fact sins sin. I support gay marriage fully when it happens between to consenting consentual of age ADULTS. We live in a society that lacks the responsibility or need to commit. Heterosexuals are even lacking opting to live together and raise children. I'm thrilled when people want to commit to one another. You two should be to as your so scared all this sinning is out there going on.
So let's go back to the issue at hand some wackjob raped a horse and a dog. Rape is wrong wether it's a man raping another man, a woman, a horse, or a dog.
I support gay marriage fully when it happens between to consenting consentual of age ADULTS.
Mike said:I support gay marriage fully when it happens between to consenting consentual of age ADULTS.
How about if the two consenting were both your brothers?
CattleArmy said:Mike said:I support gay marriage fully when it happens between to consenting consentual of age ADULTS.
How about if the two consenting were both your brothers?
Hetersosexuals aren't allowed to marry family either. A whole new door opens with incest. See you guys go so far left in trying to be right sometimes.
CattleArmy said:Mike said:I support gay marriage fully when it happens between to consenting consentual of age ADULTS.
How about if the two consenting were both your brothers?
Hetersosexuals aren't allowed to marry family either. A whole new door opens with incest. See you guys go so far left in trying to be right sometimes.
aplusmnt said:CattleArmy said:Mike said:How about if the two consenting were both your brothers?
Hetersosexuals aren't allowed to marry family either. A whole new door opens with incest. See you guys go so far left in trying to be right sometimes.
What is wrong with incest, why can it not be acceptable? Wouldn't the two people be consenting adults, no rape involved? Are you saying incest is wrong because it goes against Christian values? Is that not why it was outlawed based on Biblical reasoning?
alice said:aplusmnt said:CattleArmy said:Hetersosexuals aren't allowed to marry family either. A whole new door opens with incest. See you guys go so far left in trying to be right sometimes.
What is wrong with incest, why can it not be acceptable? Wouldn't the two people be consenting adults, no rape involved? Are you saying incest is wrong because it goes against Christian values? Is that not why it was outlawed based on Biblical reasoning?
It was "outlawed" because incest/intermarrying caused/causes birth defects...mental retardation, etc.
Alice
It was "outlawed" because incest/intermarrying caused/causes birth defects...mental retardation, etc.
Mike said:alice said:aplusmnt said:What is wrong with incest, why can it not be acceptable? Wouldn't the two people be consenting adults, no rape involved? Are you saying incest is wrong because it goes against Christian values? Is that not why it was outlawed based on Biblical reasoning?
It was "outlawed" because incest/intermarrying caused/causes birth defects...mental retardation, etc.
Alice
It's plain, clear, and obvious you don't know anything about "Linebreeding". :roll: :roll: :roll:
alice said:Mike said:alice said:It was "outlawed" because incest/intermarrying caused/causes birth defects...mental retardation, etc.
Alice
It's plain, clear, and obvious you don't know anything about "Linebreeding". :roll: :roll: :roll:
Obviously you've never worked with children that are the result of incest, thank GAWD!!!!! I can just imagine how you'd speak to them...and how you'd joke behind their backs.
Alice
alice said:aplusmnt said:CattleArmy said:Hetersosexuals aren't allowed to marry family either. A whole new door opens with incest. See you guys go so far left in trying to be right sometimes.
What is wrong with incest, why can it not be acceptable? Wouldn't the two people be consenting adults, no rape involved? Are you saying incest is wrong because it goes against Christian values? Is that not why it was outlawed based on Biblical reasoning?
It was "outlawed" because incest/intermarrying caused/causes birth defects...mental retardation, etc.
Alice
alice said:Mike said:alice said:It was "outlawed" because incest/intermarrying caused/causes birth defects...mental retardation, etc.
Alice
It's plain, clear, and obvious you don't know anything about "Linebreeding". :roll: :roll: :roll:
Obviously you've never worked with children that are the result of incest, thank GAWD!!!!! I can just imagine how you'd speak to them...and how you'd joke behind their backs.
Alice
aplusmnt said:CattleArmy said:Mike said:How about if the two consenting were both your brothers?
Hetersosexuals aren't allowed to marry family either. A whole new door opens with incest. See you guys go so far left in trying to be right sometimes.
What is wrong with incest, why can it not be acceptable? Wouldn't the two people be consenting adults, no rape involved? Are you saying incest is wrong because it goes against Christian values? Is that not why it was outlawed based on Biblical reasoning?