• If you are having problems logging in please use the Contact Us in the lower right hand corner of the forum page for assistance.

Another OBAMA DEBATE LIE

Tam

Well-known member
During last night’s presidential debate, President Obama claimed, “First of all, the sequester is not something that I’ve proposed. It is something that Congress has proposed.”

But here is what Bob Woodward reported on page 326 of his book, The Price of Politics:


At 2:30 p.m. [White House Office of Management Director Jack] Lew and [White House Director of legislative affairs Rob] Nabors went to the Senate to meet with [Senate Majority Leader Harry] Reid and his chief of staff, David Krone.
“We have an idea for the trigger,” Lew said.
“What’s the idea?” Reid asked skeptically.
“Sequestration.”
Reid bent down and put his head between his knees, almost as if he were going to throw up or was having a heart attack. he sat back up and looked at the ceiling. “A couple of weeks ago,” he said, “my staff said to me that there is one more possible” enforcement mechanism: sequestration. He said he told them, “get the hell out of here. That’s insane. The White House surely will come up with a plan that will save the day. And you come to me with sequestration?”
Well it could work, Lew and Nabors explained.

What would the impact be?
They would design it so that half the threatened cuts would be from the Defense Department.

Later on pager 339 Woodward adds:


Lew, Nabors, [White House National Economic Council Director Gene] Sperling, and Bruce Reed, Biden’s chief of staff, had finally decided to propose using language from the 1985 Gramm-Rudman-Hollings deficit reduction law as the model for the trigger. It seemed tough enough to apply to the current situation. It would require a sequester with half the cuts from Defense, and the other half from domestic programs. There would be no chance the Republicans woul want to pull the trigger and allow the sequester to force massive cuts to Defense.
 

Tam

Well-known member
Steve said:
Do you ever get the feeling Obama doesn't really know what is going on around him?

Steve are you trying to be silly tonight asking such a question? :? :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
 

Larrry

Well-known member
Seeing the leftist regime in power now is a lot like going to the zoo and watching the monkeys. They beg and then just throw crap....a true leftwingernut
 

Mike

Well-known member
Steve said:
Do you ever get the feeling Obama doesn't really know what is going on around him?

No I don't. I think he knows exactly what's going on around him.

It's his constituents that don't have a clue.
 

Tam

Well-known member
Have you notice how many times Obama will say or do something and then when he is caught up in the fall out he backtracks and says crap like he didn't apologize or he did call it a Terrorist attack a day later.

Everything he said in his 2009 World tour was meant to tell the World the US was at fault for the feeling people were having about the US. And that he as President would fix all their hurt feelings. HE WAS APOLOGIZING but the left don't see it that way as he didn't say the words I APOLOGIZE FOR PAST AMERICAN ACTIONS.

But after he spent a month telling everyone the Benghazi attack was due to a protest over a video and he is called out on his lie he claims I did call it an ACT OF TERRORISM in the Rose Garden on Sept 12. So now we are to believe his mention of ACTS OF TERRORISM (IN GENERAL CONTEXT) not effecting the US, was his way of claiming BENGHAZI WAS A TERRORIST ATTACK. :roll:

Funny how we are not to read his meaning in one speech but the left can read his meaning in another. He is the master of WORD GAMES and that is all his whole Presidency has been about WORD GAMES TO CONFUSE THE LISTENERS.

Take the Iraq war Bush not Obama negotiated the withdraw fro Iraq, all Obama had to do was negotiate the Status of Agreement that would leave some troops in Iraq to protect the achievements the US had made in that country and he and Biden blew it. So now he is claiming HE ENDED THE IRAQ WAR AND BROUGHT ALL THE TROOPS HOME LIKE HE PROMISED HE WOULD. When called out on it he acts like he knew nothing about anything called the Status of Agreement negotiations. :mad:

He claimed he knew nothing about Fast and Furious but when Issa gets close to the truth Obama claims Executive Priviledge. :?

He was called out on not going to Israel while President and he claims his first trip to Israel while he was campaign in 2008 he when there and visit all the historical sites to remind himself of their suffering as if that is suppose to make the fact AS PRESIDENT HE HAS TREATED ISRAEL LIKE DIRT UNDER HIS STINKING FEET.

WORD GAMES, EXCUSES AND BACKTRACKING WHEN CAUGHT LYING. :mad: And he expects another four years to be MORE FLEXIBLE WITH THE ENEMY, GUT THE MILITARY THOUGH HIS PROPOSED SEQUESTRATION , TO THE TREAT ALLIES LIKE DIRT AND LIE TO VOTERS . :mad:
 
Top