It might have been lost in anot6her thread but...do you agree with a Democratic speaker of the house inviting a foreign President to address Congress in regards to immigration?
If a Demonrat did it, it's all good...especially if Israel is besmirched in the process. Cummings lying about his involvement with the IRS targeting conservative groups is a non issue, and why should anybody be concerned with Hillary circumventing protocol by not using government email for SOS business/communication, or the fact her "right arm" has direct familial connections to the Muslim Brotherhood?
I think it's a BAD IDEA no matter what the sway of the Congress at the time. Boehner as just being a prick and trying to flex his muscle was all.
as far as the email issue goes, I really don't see all the fuss. I mean, hell the gov't can read all emails anyway via the NSA ..and a gov't email /server system didn't slow down Edward Snowden. So, nothing is a secret anymore.
(Before you jump on me for my typing....I had elbow surgery AGAIN yesterday!)
We have a President making all sorts of unconstitutional edicts, and when the Speaker does something entirely legal and constitutional he is a prick flexing his muscle.
Hint: I'm not particularly competent at typing, but I find my fingers much more useful at typing than my elbows.