• If you are having problems logging in please use the Contact Us in the lower right hand corner of the forum page for assistance.

Any Truth to This?

Help Support Ranchers.net:

gcreekrch

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 22, 2008
Messages
11,609
Reaction score
440
Location
west chilcotin bc
Copied this from another site, any truth to it?


If this passes, There will be a civil war.
U.S. reverses stance on treaty to regulate arms trade


WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The United States reversed policy on Wednesday and said it would back launching talks on a treaty to regulate arms sales as long as the talks operated by consensus, a stance critics said gave every nation a veto.


The decision, announced in a statement released by the U.S. State Department, overturns the position of former President George W. Bush's administration, which had opposed such a treaty on the grounds that national controls were better.


On Wednesday Obama Took the First Major Step in a Plan to Ban All Firearms in the United States. The Obama administration intends to
force gun control and a complete ban on all weapons for US citizens through the signing of international treaties with foreign nations. By
signing international treaties on gun control, the Obama administration can use the US State Department to bypass the normal legislative process in Congress. Once the US Government signs these international treaties, all US citizens will be subject to those gun laws created by foreign governments. These are laws that have been developed and promoted by organizations such as the United Nations and individuals such as George Soros and Michael Bloomberg. The laws are designed and intended to lead to the complete ban and confiscation of all firearms.


The Obama administration is attempting to use tactics and methods of gun control that will inflict major damage to our 2nd Amendment before US citizens even understand what has happened. Obama can appear before the public and tell them that he does not intend to pursue any legislation (in the United States) that will lead to new gun control laws, while cloaked in secrecy, his Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton is committing the US to international treaties and foreign gun control laws. Does that mean Obama is telling the truth? What it means is that there will be no publicized gun control debates in the media or votes in Congress. We will wake up one morning and find that the United States has signed a treaty that prohibits firearm and ammunition manufacturers from selling to the public. We will wake up another morning and find that the US has signed a treaty that prohibits any transfer of firearm ownership. And then, we will wake up yet another morning and find that the US has signed a treaty that requires US citizens to deliver any firearm they own to the local government collection and destruction center or face imprisonment.


This is not a joke nor a false warning. As sure as government health care will be forced on us by the Obama administration through whatever means necessary, so will gun control.


Please forward this message to others who may be concerned about the direction in which our country is headed.


We are being led like a lamb to the slaughter (Socialism/Dictatorship).


I do not know if this is true or not.
 

Steve

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 13, 2005
Messages
16,547
Reaction score
1
Location
Wildwood New Jersey
Any Truth to This?

and to top it off,.. the put Iran in a key position to negotiate the treaty.. :shock:

The Arms Trade Treaty is the name of a controversial potential multilateral treaty that would regulate the international trade in conventional weapons. The treaty is being negotiated at a global conference under the auspices of the United Nations from July 2–27, 2012 in New York

Sources have revealed that the famously corrupt anti-gun diplomats at the U.N. have given IRAN a key seat at the negotiations for the global arms treaty.

Do you want to know who else has a seat at the table to carve-up your gun rights?

Egypt, China, Belarus and Nigeria among others.

Mexico is using the Obama administration’s Fast and Furious debacle as their justification to take your Second Amendment right


On July 12, 2012, the United States issued a statement condemning the selection of Iran to serve as vice president of the conference. The statement called the move "outrageous" and noted that Iran is under Security Council sanctions for weapons proliferation



while it may pass the UN it will not pass in the senate..
As of September 14, 2011, 58 US Senators (45 Republicans and 13 Democrats) have expressed their opposition to an ATT that would limit the Second Amendment rights of US citizen
 

Steve

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 13, 2005
Messages
16,547
Reaction score
1
Location
Wildwood New Jersey
an article from a source only a liberal can trust..

"I believe there are some countries like Iran, Syria, North Korea and others which really don't like the treaty," he told Al Jazeera.

"The Chinese delegation announced that they would only allow the European Union to be a state party to this treaty if the European Union ended its arms embargo on China by the end of today. As soon as they said that, a lot of delegates in the room just burst out laughing."

"The last time world powers tried to do this was in the 1920s and it failed ... It's taken all this time to bring them back together.

http://www.aljazeera.com/news/americas/2012/07/201272718366780286.html


from another more reliable source..
The U.S. State Department, however, said in a statement released at the conclusion of the negotiating conference that the effort will indeed be revived after the election in November.

Joe Klein leading the pack at Time Magazine – are now pushing “sensible” and “moderate” approaches to disarming the American people.
 

jigs

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 17, 2005
Messages
8,439
Reaction score
0
Location
KANSAS
if they ban guns, I hope they send Obama out to collect the guns......
 

smalltime

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 25, 2005
Messages
600
Reaction score
0
Location
SD
Noone is going to take our guns jigs.The constitution says so .I will fight to the death to protect the constitution and youwill too_Obama wont be the one to collect the guns tho.It will be the armed forces that do the job.
 

Faster horses

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 11, 2005
Messages
29,544
Reaction score
724
Location
NE WY at the foot of the Big Horn mountains
smalltime said:
Noone is going to take our guns jigs.The constitution says so .I will fight to the death to protect the constitution and youwill too_Obama wont be the one to collect the guns tho.It will be the armed forces that do the job.

I'm not totally convinced the armed forces will do it, smalltime.
Doesn't Obama have his own military that answers to no one but
him? Not sure of that, but I know it was on the table at one time,
as it was with Clinton.
 

Triangle Bar

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 24, 2008
Messages
1,282
Reaction score
2
Location
S. Central Colorado
Faster horses said:
smalltime said:
Noone is going to take our guns jigs.The constitution says so .I will fight to the death to protect the constitution and youwill too_Obama wont be the one to collect the guns tho.It will be the armed forces that do the job.

I'm not totally convinced the armed forces will do it, smalltime.
Doesn't Obama have his own military that answers to no one but
him? Not sure of that, but I know it was on the table at one time,
as it was with Clinton.

Regardless if LEOs or military whom are tasked to collect guns... it will be up to those individuals to decide if they are going to just follow orders or uphold the oath they took to defend & protect the constitution.
 

Faster horses

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 11, 2005
Messages
29,544
Reaction score
724
Location
NE WY at the foot of the Big Horn mountains
but...but...but...under the consitiution we have the right to bear arms...
so would the armed forces take them when that is written into the
constitution?

I suppose there is no way of knowing til the time comes...and it will,
as long as these jackasses are in charge. Too bad that last election
(2010) didn't get rid of Harry Reid. That would have helped immensely.
 

Latest posts

Top