• If you are having problems logging in please use the Contact Us in the lower right hand corner of the forum page for assistance.

Are Mike and Hypocritexposer Over Exposed?

hypocritexposer

Well-known member
Go count the people on this thread that think you are a Nut!

You are correct though, I find a lot of people will not respond to a post:

If they agree with it OR if they cannot bring facts to discount it!
 

alice

Well-known member
R2,

I wish you'd made it a poll...

However, I vote yes...they are overexposed...and they both have way too much time on their hands.

Alice
 

hypocritexposer

Well-known member
hypo - I said neither of those things - I did not say that you cannot post anymore. Nor did I say that I don't agree with what you post. (Although usually the latter is true Wink)

I point out that you each post as if you have OCD, posting 12 - 20 threads a day, one after the other, and that most of them are ignored.

I suggest that if you wish to be taken seriously you post fewer threads and on a variety of topics versus just Obama bashing.

Who told you they do not take the posts seriously? I would suggest that you count the different topics I have posted on this week, while you are at it, count the sources, so I'm not accused of going to the "same well of info."

Back your statements up with a little more fact, and you my dear Liberal, will be taken more seriously!
 

hypocritexposer

Well-known member
You'd have to ask them, and not assume that you always know how others are feeling!

Obviously they are not finding this thread overly exciting either!
 

Bullhauler

Well-known member
hypocritexposer said:
You'd have to ask them, and not assume that you always know how others are feeling!

Obviously they are not finding this thread overly exciting either!

Well I see a different thread Reader started is up to 9 pages in just two days.
 

Sandhusker

Well-known member
reader (the Second) said:
Go count the number of threads they have started with 0 or 1 response in the past few weeks :lol: :lol: :lol:

That just proves how adept liberals are at ignoring facts that contradict their fanstasy worlds. No matter how true it may be, if you ignore it, it doesn't exist.
 

MsSage

Well-known member
Reader didnt nonothing do the same sort of thing count posts? :roll:
I wish I had as much time as yall do but with work and PT and other blogs and quilting I dont have time nor can I sit for that long.
Oh well I guess it s a slow day and you needed some thing to do. Did it keep you out of trouble? cool have fun :wink: :wink: :p :p
 

kolanuraven

Well-known member
Soapweed said:
alice said:
R2,

I wish you'd made it a poll...

However, I vote yes...they are overexposed...and they both have way too much time on their hands.

Alice

And the two of you don't? :???: :roll:


Yeah girls....look at all the time you waste here when you could be out taking pictures of other people working!!!!!!!! :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
 

Larrry

Well-known member
Heck you could even post opn the thiongs you have that come from other peoples efforts. The thing that is way worse than posting these stupid post counts of yours is you following them like a sniveling idiot.
 

backhoeboogie

Well-known member
reader (the Second) said:
Go count the number of threads they have started with 0 or 1 response in the past few weeks :lol: :lol: :lol:

When reading their posts, would you like for me to respond to all of them?
 

Mike

Well-known member
Maybe some subjects have been posted that the Libs don't like? :lol: :lol:

You have given me a new agenda R2.

That is to "Double" my numbers of posts that seem to aggravate or upset you. :lol: :lol:

All in all, yes, I have seen the numbers of posts that cannot be argued by the left.............

Feel like you're losing the battle?????? GOOD!!!!!!! :lol:

It also makes me feel good that I have gotten on one of your nerves. Maybe the last one? :lol:


WE TOLD YOU SO!!!!!!!!!!!!!
 

Larrry

Well-known member
Exactly they just don't like you making those post because it reinforces your ability to tell the WE TOLD YOU SO It is just the libs trying to silence the opposition.

I read most of those posts when I do come on, way more the liberal whining cryinbaby posts.
 

backhoeboogie

Well-known member
Mike reader must be reading all of your posts. I didn't think she read much at all :D

So those numbers in the "viewers" column include atleast one from her.
 

hypocritexposer

Well-known member
I'd like to see Reader2 do an accurate data set on posting. Alice can be her helper.

Include such things as:

1) Response to views ratio
2) Response to views ratio, minus secondary responses by Author of original topic
3) Responses to praise or condemn the topic, grouped by Political affiliation
4) Responses made to divert the topic, grouped by Political affiliation
5) # of apologies generated by topic, (PM'd or public)
6) # of views that should be discounted, due to Reader viewing them, just to count the views!

That should keep you busy for a bit Reader and sidekick. :wink:

P.S Apology accepted!
 

Mike

Well-known member
backhoeboogie said:
Mike reader must be reading all of your posts. I didn't think she read much at all :D

So those numbers in the "viewers" column include atleast one from her.

Her biatching and non-response shows her inability to debate the subject at hand? :lol: :lol:
 

hopalong

Well-known member
Since they think non responses to the posts means no one is reading them
it appears that if we read a post we must respond, so i suggest we do do even if all we do is bump it back to the top, that would make r2 and fluffy1 and fluffy2 happy :D :D
 
Top