• If you are having problems logging in please use the Contact Us in the lower right hand corner of the forum page for assistance.

Are you not insulted?

kolanuraven

Well-known member
You Rep's & Bush supporters should be insulted .


We've heard..

NO TIMELINE FOR WITHDRAWL

WE'LL STAY AS LONG AS NEEDED, WE'LL NOT SET A TIME LINE
WE"LL DECIDE WHEN WE LEAVE

NO TIMELINE



Now, we hear that Bush and the Iraqi Pm are setting up a Troop Withdrawl Horizon???????????????????????????/



Come on people, he's insulted you on every " NO" remark he's made by going the complete and opposite direction EVERY TIME.....and here's the lastest one!!


He's trying to save his legacy ( azz) with both hands now.
 

Bullhauler

Well-known member
Sandhusker said:
A timeline is a DATE. Only an idiot would tell their enemies when they were going to leave.

Why the hell not? You think the Iraqi government is ever going to get it together if they know we will always be there propping them up? Iraq is like a twenty something child that still lives at home. It is time for some tough love and let them stand up and make it on their own.
 

Sandhusker

Well-known member
Bullhauler said:
Sandhusker said:
A timeline is a DATE. Only an idiot would tell their enemies when they were going to leave.

Why the hell not? You think the Iraqi government is ever going to get it together if they know we will always be there propping them up? Iraq is like a twenty something child that still lives at home. It is time for some tough love and let them stand up and make it on their own.

So you're telling me that if you're al-quada, the Iranian backed cavemen, or any other terrorist group, that you don't consider the date your enemy is going to move off the continent pertinent and usable information to your cause?
 

Bullhauler

Well-known member
Sandhusker said:
Bullhauler said:
Sandhusker said:
A timeline is a DATE. Only an idiot would tell their enemies when they were going to leave.

Why the hell not? You think the Iraqi government is ever going to get it together if they know we will always be there propping them up? Iraq is like a twenty something child that still lives at home. It is time for some tough love and let them stand up and make it on their own.

So you're telling me that if you're al-quada, the Iranian backed cavemen, or any other terrorist group, that you don't consider the date your enemy is going to move off the continent pertinent and usable information to your cause?

Not if the government of Iraq is ready to take over it isn't.
 

Sandhusker

Well-known member
Bullhauler said:
Sandhusker said:
Bullhauler said:
Why the hell not? You think the Iraqi government is ever going to get it together if they know we will always be there propping them up? Iraq is like a twenty something child that still lives at home. It is time for some tough love and let them stand up and make it on their own.

So you're telling me that if you're al-quada, the Iranian backed cavemen, or any other terrorist group, that you don't consider the date your enemy is going to move off the continent pertinent and usable information to your cause?

Not if the government of Iraq is ready to take over it isn't.

Think about it, that makes that information even more valuable! You've got a weak government that can't stop you, and you know the date that the only force that can stop you is leaving. So what do you do? You lay low, get your supplies in order, rest your "troops", train new ones, and use that time to make plans and test those plans. When that date comes and the troops leave, you're totally prepared to take over.
 

fff

Well-known member
Sandhusker said:
Bullhauler said:
Sandhusker said:
So you're telling me that if you're al-quada, the Iranian backed cavemen, or any other terrorist group, that you don't consider the date your enemy is going to move off the continent pertinent and usable information to your cause?

Not if the government of Iraq is ready to take over it isn't.

Think about it, that makes that information even more valuable! You've got a weak government that can't stop you, and you know the date that the only force that can stop you is leaving. So what do you do? You lay low, get your supplies in order, rest your "troops", train new ones, and use that time to make plans and test those plans. When that date comes and the troops leave, you're totally prepared to take over.

We've got the head of the government of Iraq, a soverign country, saying he wants us out of there in 16 months. Are you saying we should just ignore that request? That we should stay against the will of both Iraqis and their government?

I will be pleasantly surprised if Bush draws down numbers in Iraq. I don't think he'll do it. He'll see that as an admission of HIS failure and he can't stomach that. IMO, it will be up to the next president and we know McCain won't do it.....at least that was his stand last time I saw him mention it. No telling what his stand is today. :roll:
 

Sandhusker

Well-known member
If the government of Iraq wants us out today, I think that's their call and any result is on them.

However, Iraq calling for 16 months is a reletively new development. A year ago, they weren't saying that and you had Pelosi, Reid, and a host of other morons calling for a time line. That's what I'm talking about.
 

fff

Well-known member
Sandhusker said:
If the government of Iraq wants us out today, I think that's their call and any result is on them.

However, Iraq calling for 16 months is a reletively new development. A year ago, they weren't saying that and you had Pelosi, Reid, and a host of other morons calling for a time line. That's what I'm talking about.

Fairly new, yes. But two weeks ago, Maliki said the status of forces agreement (or whatever they're calling it) between the US and Iraq must have a withdrawal timetable. :D The Bush Administration dismissed that comment as a "translation error" and McCain brushed aside Maliki and his national security advisor's comments about a timetable for withdrawal. Now Bush is apparently agreeing to a "General Time Horizon." Have you ever in your entire life reached the horizon?

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080708/ap_on_re_mi_ea/iraq
 

kolanuraven

Well-known member
Sandhusker said:
If the government of Iraq wants us out today, I think that's their call and any result is on them.

However, Iraq calling for 16 months is a reletively new development. A year ago, they weren't saying that and you had Pelosi, Reid, and a host of other morons calling for a time line. That's what I'm talking about.


Those bastards....you mean Iraqi's flip flop also????? :shock: :shock: :shock:

How dare them change their minds as the situation changed, why it's practically scandalous!!


Well YOUR Rep. idiot is asking talking " horizon"


QUESTION to SANDY--- If a time line is a DATE, as you put it, what is your measure of the use of the word "horizon" in this instance?


Bush is talking down to his supporters like they are too stupid to translate the meanings..... ( and apparently they are!!)
 

Larrry

Well-known member
Words, words, words if the liberal socialist aren't pleased with a word they crap their pants.

Why are so many hung up on what they hear and want to hear. Do you think that the WH in all of history always puts out the info to please you. The WH has all down through history used the media to send info to the enemy. Why do you liberal socialists have such a hard time understanding that. what do you think, the WH should call you and ask your permission to do anything.

And to think these liberal socialists can vote-well sometimes.
 

Sandhusker

Well-known member
kolanuraven said:
Sandhusker said:
If the government of Iraq wants us out today, I think that's their call and any result is on them.

However, Iraq calling for 16 months is a reletively new development. A year ago, they weren't saying that and you had Pelosi, Reid, and a host of other morons calling for a time line. That's what I'm talking about.


Those bastards....you mean Iraqi's flip flop also????? :shock: :shock: :shock:

How dare them change their minds as the situation changed, why it's practically scandalous!!


Well YOUR Rep. idiot is asking talking " horizon"


QUESTION to SANDY--- If a time line is a DATE, as you put it, what is your measure of the use of the word "horizon" in this instance?


Bush is talking down to his supporters like they are too stupid to translate the meanings..... ( and apparently they are!!)

I have no "Rep. idiot", I'm not a Rep.

Why is it that when libs are confronted with one of their own making an ass of themselves, the response is always to point fingers and say, "Well, he did it, too". Bottom line: You DON'T tell your enemies what you're going to do. Stupid, stupid, stupid - soon to be dead, dead, dead.

Isn't a DATE a function of TIME? Aren't the two somewhat related? Where is the relationship between "DATE" and "HORIZON"? Explain to me how you read "Horizon" and then think "date"?
 

kolanuraven

Well-known member
You just can't answer a question.

You replied with about 4 questions!!!

You're just as confused as the rest of your gang!!


Ok, you're not a Rep..... but who did you vote for in the last election??? I voted for Kerry.

But knowing you , spouting all this crap and you prob didn't even vote.
 

fff

Well-known member
Sandhusker said:
kolanuraven said:
Sandhusker said:
If the government of Iraq wants us out today, I think that's their call and any result is on them.

However, Iraq calling for 16 months is a reletively new development. A year ago, they weren't saying that and you had Pelosi, Reid, and a host of other morons calling for a time line. That's what I'm talking about.


Those bastards....you mean Iraqi's flip flop also????? :shock: :shock: :shock:

How dare them change their minds as the situation changed, why it's practically scandalous!!


Well YOUR Rep. idiot is asking talking " horizon"


QUESTION to SANDY--- If a time line is a DATE, as you put it, what is your measure of the use of the word "horizon" in this instance?


Bush is talking down to his supporters like they are too stupid to translate the meanings..... ( and apparently they are!!)

I have no "Rep. idiot", I'm not a Rep.

Why is it that when libs are confronted with one of their own making an ass of themselves, the response is always to point fingers and say, "Well, he did it, too". Bottom line: You DON'T tell your enemies what you're going to do. Stupid, stupid, stupid - soon to be dead, dead, dead.

Isn't a DATE a function of TIME? Aren't the two somewhat related? Where is the relationship between "DATE" and "HORIZON"? Explain to me how you read "Horizon" and then think "date"?

I think you have we libs confused with Larrry, Curley (Mike) and Mo (you). I don't relate date and horizon. I see horizon and know that Bush will never agree to bring our troops back.

But the fact that he's agreed to anything relating to bringing troops home is a major about face on his part.
 

Sandhusker

Well-known member
kolanuraven said:
You just can't answer a question.

You replied with about 4 questions!!!

You're just as confused as the rest of your gang!!


Ok, you're not a Rep..... but who did you vote for in the last election??? I voted for Kerry.

But knowing you , spouting all this crap and you prob didn't even vote.

I don't remember who I voted for - it was one of the guaranteed also-rans. I just refused to vote for Clown A or Clown B, and wanted to send a little message that I don't have to choose just between the two big outfits.

The word "horizon" tells me very little about how/when/why troops will be withdrawn. How do you equate the word "horizon" to "date"?
 

kolanuraven

Well-known member
Sandhusker said:
kolanuraven said:
You just can't answer a question.

You replied with about 4 questions!!!

You're just as confused as the rest of your gang!!


Ok, you're not a Rep..... but who did you vote for in the last election??? I voted for Kerry.

But knowing you , spouting all this crap and you prob didn't even vote.

I don't remember who I voted for - it was one of the guaranteed also-rans. I just refused to vote for Clown A or Clown B, and wanted to send a little message that I don't have to choose just between the two big outfits.

The word "horizon" tells me very little about how/when/why troops will be withdrawn. How do you equate the word "horizon" to "date"?


OK...all this tells me that you vote for Bush. How could you NOT remember who you voted for when there was only 2 people running??? Man.....I would have thought you'd come up with somethiing better that than.

OK..how do I equate the word " horizon" to day? I equate it as a load of crap, another lie, and chicken shite way of wording for them to say TROOP WITHDRAWL.

Which is a MAJOR FLIP FLOP on their part....just another thing they've gone back on and lo and behold...changed their minds!!! :shock: :shock: :roll: :roll: :roll:


See, I was able to answer your question quiet easily.
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
I wonder how many White House attorneys and how much time they spent trying to come up with that word and that term- rather than just be honest and say we changed our position :???:

Do you see why the world wouldn't trust the man or his White House Crew of fools if they said "the sun rises in the east" :???:

Reminds me of the same way King George got one of his neocon attorneys to differently interpret one word in the law Congress passed to keep Mexican truckers out of the country- so he could go around the law, and the intent of Congress, to the ire of both Repub and Dem Congressmen.... :(
 

Sandhusker

Well-known member
I didn't vote for Bush either time. I didn't vote for the Dem. candidate either time. I'll swear to that with my right hand on the Bible. I don't know where you vote, but in Nebraska, there are other candidates on the ballot other than the two big parties.

Saying they will withdraw troops is only a flip-flop if they said they would never withdraw troops. When did Bush say that? I'll bet he never did - thus, no flip-flop. You're just throwing mud and hoping some sticks.

You never answered my question, you tangented off becasue there is no link between "Date" and "Horizon". Just throwing mud....
 

Texan

Well-known member
kolanuraven said:
Are you not insulted?
Actually, what insults me more than anything is the fact that some of you libs could actually support a racist, ultra-liberal, freshman Senator from Chicago to be the leader of this country and the Commander-in-Chief of our Armed Forces.

He's not even qualified to hold the job that he's got now and some of you are ready to promote him to the highest office in this land. That's what I find insulting.
 
Top