You boys sure get confused trying to keep your lies about NCBA coherent.....and you are not really succeeding either!
OT, it's pretty pathetic when you have to resort to putting down a guy because of a prominent Adams apple! Maybe you are jealous.......it's usually tall, thin guys who have prominent adams apples, isn't it???
Haven't you been too busy playing judge or working your horsetrader gig to spend much time visiting with your anti-NCBA buddies?
You boys having hissy fits over the no BSE test stopping exports have no proof that the trade would have opened any faster if we had been testing. People I've heard talk who have considerable expertise and experience in international beef trade believe that issue is more an artificial trade barrier than anything else. It certainly isn't justified by known science.
Sandhusker, you DID NOT KNOW, did you??? Those VP's you have been claiming were members tossed out of NCBA for some hidden reason which you apparently assumed must be some scandal, were really staff people!!!! How many times did you post THAT false claim without getting the facts????
It probably is right, as many have told me, that there is no real use in trying to point out the ignorance and misconceptions of some of your posts to you. And your tagline does admit your posts are simply your own opinions, substantiated only by yourself. I suppose that could be why there are few other NCBA members posting her anymore. Bullsession has been dominated by a few of you with Luddite views for quite some time now. It seems a shame, as it used to be a good place for give and take exchange of views.
I believe NCBA has the right to tell legislators that OUR more than 40,000 members believe issues we support are in the best interest of the cattle industry. It would be rather easy for legislators to figure out how much of the US cattle industry we control, thus the affect on the total industry.
Sandhusker, your refusal to admit that NCBA does NOT represent packers to congress is simply that.......your refusal to admit it.......not fact at all.
NCBA members know there has to be a better way than the old LMA led adversarial relationship with packers, where each segment of the cattle/beef business feeds off the one behind it. We believe it more product to work cooperatively to achieve a Value Based system where we are paid for the value we add to the product we sell.
mrj
I don't share your beliefs that the USA is going to be flooded with South American beef anytime soon.
mrj
OT, it's pretty pathetic when you have to resort to putting down a guy because of a prominent Adams apple! Maybe you are jealous.......it's usually tall, thin guys who have prominent adams apples, isn't it???
Haven't you been too busy playing judge or working your horsetrader gig to spend much time visiting with your anti-NCBA buddies?
You boys having hissy fits over the no BSE test stopping exports have no proof that the trade would have opened any faster if we had been testing. People I've heard talk who have considerable expertise and experience in international beef trade believe that issue is more an artificial trade barrier than anything else. It certainly isn't justified by known science.
Sandhusker, you DID NOT KNOW, did you??? Those VP's you have been claiming were members tossed out of NCBA for some hidden reason which you apparently assumed must be some scandal, were really staff people!!!! How many times did you post THAT false claim without getting the facts????
It probably is right, as many have told me, that there is no real use in trying to point out the ignorance and misconceptions of some of your posts to you. And your tagline does admit your posts are simply your own opinions, substantiated only by yourself. I suppose that could be why there are few other NCBA members posting her anymore. Bullsession has been dominated by a few of you with Luddite views for quite some time now. It seems a shame, as it used to be a good place for give and take exchange of views.
I believe NCBA has the right to tell legislators that OUR more than 40,000 members believe issues we support are in the best interest of the cattle industry. It would be rather easy for legislators to figure out how much of the US cattle industry we control, thus the affect on the total industry.
Sandhusker, your refusal to admit that NCBA does NOT represent packers to congress is simply that.......your refusal to admit it.......not fact at all.
NCBA members know there has to be a better way than the old LMA led adversarial relationship with packers, where each segment of the cattle/beef business feeds off the one behind it. We believe it more product to work cooperatively to achieve a Value Based system where we are paid for the value we add to the product we sell.
mrj
I don't share your beliefs that the USA is going to be flooded with South American beef anytime soon.
mrj