• If you are having problems logging in please use the Contact Us in the lower right hand corner of the forum page for assistance.

Awlaki Was Working With FBI?

hypocritexposer

Well-known member
Oldtimer said:
hypocritexposer said:
Oldtimer said:
I'd bet they have drones packing all kinds of detecting equipment up looking for him... Problem with that is I understand that this is heavily timbered country full of wildlife and now deer hunters....

So taking out innocent associates is okay, but taking out a few trees and a deer, or 2 isn't?

You didn't really post that did you :???: :shock: Like discussing something with a bunch of second graders.... :roll:
But at least they would have concern for the deer :wink: :p :lol:

Lefties like yourself, always care more about trees and animals, than you do human life.

Advocated for any abortions today?
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
Whitewing said:
Which felon? You seemed to have missed my question OT.

Well it was a dumb question... Who have we been talking about -Al Awlaki ...
He was an international felon- with a "dead or alive" warrant issued for him by his "dual citizenship" country of Yemen which like the US is a part of the Interpol cooperative of law enforcement...
 

Whitewing

Well-known member
Oldtimer said:
Whitewing said:
Which felon? You seemed to have missed my question OT.

Well it was a dumb question... Who have we been talking about -Al Awlaki ...
He was an international felon- with a "dead or alive" warrant issued for him by his "dual citizenship" country of Yemen which like the US is a part of the Interpol cooperative of law enforcement...

I think yóu're making **** up as you go.

But along those same lines, why haven't you called for the arrest and extradition of Bush, Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld and their legal advisers Alberto Gonzales, David Addington, William Haynes, Jay Bybee and John Yoo?

They were all tried and convicted in abstencia in Malaysia who I'm sure is a part of the Intepol cooperative of law enforcement you mention above.

And further to that indictment and conviction, Obama's failure to act on the charges against Bush is also considered a war crime.

But as international law expert Francis Boyle, a professor of law at the University of Illinois, notes, under the Geneva Convention, failing to take action to prosecute those guilty of war crimes such as the “Crime against Peace” (invading a country that does not pose an imminent threat to the attacker), and torture, are war crimes in and of themselves.

Speaking last week at a Summit Conference on Human Rights held at the University of the Sacred Heart in the US island colony of Puerto Rico, Boyle said US authorities, including President Obama, are engaged in an “ongoing criminal conspiracy under international law” both to cover up and protect criminals like Bush, Cheney and Rumsfeld, and to continue the commission of war crimes by the US government.

So there you have it OT. Indictments, convictions, and failure to carry out the mandate of international laws has placed the last two US administrations squarely against international law.

I'm sure you'll be calling for the heads of all involved in these crimes including the failure of your Messiah to act on what is clearly a legitimate case out of Malaysia.
 

Whitewing

Well-known member
both President Obama and AG Holder became war criminals themselves under the UN Charter and the Nuremberg Principles, which declare that covering up war crimes by prior government and military leaders, and failure to prosecute such war crimes, are in themselves war crimes.

But as Boyle noted in his address in San Juan, P.R., Obama, Vice President Joseph Biden, and the various secretaries of defense and state, the head of the CIA and the Pentagon Chiefs of Staff, as well as other Obama administration personnel, are also guilty of perpetrating ongoing war crimes themselves.

Boyle accuses the Obama administration of continuing to conduct a “bogus” war on “international terrorism” including the ever escalating campaign of drone strikes in Pakistan, Afghanistan, Somalia, Yemen and other jurisdictions. He termed the president’s program of “targeted killings,” in which President Obama himself draws up the “kill list,” to be simply a case of “pure murder” under both traditional British common law and international law, and says these attacks constitute a “Crime against Humanity under Article 7(1)(a) of the Rome Statute for the International Criminal Court.”

An American murdering other Americans and non-Americans. This must make you very angry OT. :roll:
 

Mike

Well-known member
Oldtimer said:
Mike said:
Whitewing said:
Which felon are you referring to OT?

Which book?

U.S. Law

Under U.S. law the fleeing felon rule was limited in 1985 to non-lethal force in most cases by Tennessee v. Garner, 471 U.S. 1. The justices held that deadly force "may not be used unless necessary to prevent the escape and the officer has probable cause to believe that the suspect poses a significant threat of death or serious bodily harm to the officer or others."


A police officer may not seize an unarmed, nondangerous suspect by shooting him dead...however...Where the officer has probable cause to believe that the suspect poses a threat of serious physical harm, either to the officer or to others, it is not constitutionally unreasonable to prevent escape by using deadly force.

—Justice Byron White, Tennessee v. Garner

The son had no ties to terrorism and U.S authorities have called his death a mistake. Where was his probable cause? :roll:
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
Whitewing said:
Oldtimer said:
Whitewing said:
Which felon? You seemed to have missed my question OT.

Well it was a dumb question... Who have we been talking about -Al Awlaki ...
He was an international felon- with a "dead or alive" warrant issued for him by his "dual citizenship" country of Yemen which like the US is a part of the Interpol cooperative of law enforcement...

I think yóu're making s*** up as you go.

But along those same lines, why haven't you called for the arrest and extradition of Bush, Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld and their legal advisers Alberto Gonzales, David Addington, William Haynes, Jay Bybee and John Yoo?

They were all tried and convicted in abstencia in Malaysia who I'm sure is a part of the Intepol cooperative of law enforcement you mention above.

And further to that indictment and conviction, Obama's failure to act on the charges against Bush is also considered a war crime.

But as international law expert Francis Boyle, a professor of law at the University of Illinois, notes, under the Geneva Convention, failing to take action to prosecute those guilty of war crimes such as the “Crime against Peace” (invading a country that does not pose an imminent threat to the attacker), and torture, are war crimes in and of themselves.

Speaking last week at a Summit Conference on Human Rights held at the University of the Sacred Heart in the US island colony of Puerto Rico, Boyle said US authorities, including President Obama, are engaged in an “ongoing criminal conspiracy under international law” both to cover up and protect criminals like Bush, Cheney and Rumsfeld, and to continue the commission of war crimes by the US government.

So there you have it OT. Indictments, convictions, and failure to carry out the mandate of international laws has placed the last two US administrations squarely against international law.

I'm sure you'll be calling for the heads of all involved in these crimes including the failure of your Messiah to act on what is clearly a legitimate case out of Malaysia.

The US is an active participant with Interpol in tracking down and arresting international criminals wanted by the courts of the world for normal crimes such as murder, kidnapping, terrorism, etc., etc.

On November 22, the Kuala Lumpur War Crimes Tribunal based in Malaysia indicted former US President George Bush and former UK Prime Minister Tony Blair for war crimes, in connection with the 2003 invasion and subsequent occupation of Iraq.

But Bush was indicted under the war crimes act- and the US is not a signatory country to the International Criminal Courts that have jurisdiction over 'war crimes'...

The United States is not a participant in the International Criminal Court (ICC). The ICC is a permanent international criminal court, founded in 2002 by the Rome Statute to "bring to justice the perpetrators of the worst crimes known to humankind – war crimes, crimes against humanity, and genocide", especially when national courts are unable or unwilling to do so.

As of September 2012, 121 states are members of the court and 32 countries have signed but not ratified the Rome Statute. Other countries that have not signed or ratified the Rome Statute include India, Indonesia, and China. On May 6, 2002, the United States, in a position shared with Israel and Sudan, having previously signed the Rome Statute, formally withdrew its intent of ratification.

Positions in the United States concerning the ICC vary widely. The Clinton Administration signed the Rome Statute in 2000, but did not submit it for Senate ratification. The Bush Administration, the US administration at the time of the ICC's founding, stated that it would not join the ICC. The Obama Administration has subsequently re-established a working relationship with the court.

Kind of ironic that it was Bush that refused to go along with the 121 countries of the world that ratified the court !

Same irony as is why a U.S. citizen who prefers to live in the jungle of a communist country, and b*tch daily about the U.S., is so worried about the subject of Presidents being able to hunt down US wanted criminals in foreign countries by drones .... :wink:
 

kolanuraven

Well-known member
Mike said:
Oldtimer said:
Mike said:
Which book?

U.S. Law

Under U.S. law the fleeing felon rule was limited in 1985 to non-lethal force in most cases by Tennessee v. Garner, 471 U.S. 1. The justices held that deadly force "may not be used unless necessary to prevent the escape and the officer has probable cause to believe that the suspect poses a significant threat of death or serious bodily harm to the officer or others."


A police officer may not seize an unarmed, nondangerous suspect by shooting him dead...however...Where the officer has probable cause to believe that the suspect poses a threat of serious physical harm, either to the officer or to others, it is not constitutionally unreasonable to prevent escape by using deadly force.

—Justice Byron White, Tennessee v. Garner

The son had no ties to terrorism and U.S authorities have called his death a mistake. Where was his probable cause? :roll:


Thomas Friedman, author of From Beruit to Jersuleum, had a GREAT line that at once was shocking but now has a whole other aspect.

He was interviewing a security guard while he and the guard were stationed in Jersuleum. The guard was making reference to the people of the Gaza strip at the time.

" Sometimes you just have to shoot these people".
 

Mike

Well-known member
kolanuraven said:
Mike said:

The son had no ties to terrorism and U.S authorities have called his death a mistake. Where was his probable cause? :roll:


Thomas Friedman, author of From Beruit to Jersuleum, had a GREAT line that at once was shocking but now has a whole other aspect.

He was interviewing a security guard while he and the guard were stationed in Jersuleum. The guard was making reference to the people of the Gaza strip at the time.

" Sometimes you just have to shoot these people".

Ooooooooooo, that's very rich. The answer to all problems.

Especially with you being so Anti-Semitic. :roll:
 

kolanuraven

Well-known member
Mike said:
kolanuraven said:
Mike said:
The son had no ties to terrorism and U.S authorities have called his death a mistake. Where was his probable cause? :roll:


Thomas Friedman, author of From Beruit to Jersuleum, had a GREAT line that at once was shocking but now has a whole other aspect.

He was interviewing a security guard while he and the guard were stationed in Jersuleum. The guard was making reference to the people of the Gaza strip at the time.

" Sometimes you just have to shoot these people".

Ooooooooooo, that's very rich. The answer to all problems.

Especially with you being so Anti-Semitic. :roll:


I'll ask you also, find the VERY post where I said I was anti-Semitic.


Find it , hotshot.
 

loomixguy

Well-known member
kolanuraven said:
loomixguy said:
Inferred. You've never posted one good, positive thing about Israel or the children of Abraham.


But that doesn't mean I'm anti anything.

It just means that I know the facts.

So do I. You are an anti-Semite, pure and simple, bless your little heart. :wink:
 

Whitewing

Well-known member
Oldtimer said:
Same irony as is why a U.S. citizen who prefers to live in the jungle of a communist country, and b*tch daily about the U.S., is so worried about the subject of Presidents being able to hunt down US wanted criminals in foreign countries by drones .... :wink:

The only thing ironic about this entire issue is that you whined incessantly about King George trampling that precious constitution which you'd fought all those years to defend, putting your life on the line etc etc etc yet you'd rather bend over backwards and suck your own johnson instead of finding a single shred of a problem with a group of unnamed government officials in conjunction with a US president targeting an American citizen for assassination even though was he not on a battleground, was not armed and threatening anyone and HE HAD NEVER BEEN CHARGED WITH A SINGLE CRIME IN A SINGLE AMERICAN COURT.

That makes you a big fat tool, you big fat hypocrite.

Hypocrite:
a person who pretends to have virtues, moral or religious beliefs, principles, etc., that he or she does not actually possess, especially a person whose actions belie stated beliefs.

a person who feigns some desirable or publicly approved attitude, especially one whose private life, opinions, or statements belie his or her public statements.

Precious Constitution. :lol:
 

Mike

Well-known member
kolanuraven said:
loomixguy said:
Inferred. You've never posted one good, positive thing about Israel or the children of Abraham.


But that doesn't mean I'm anti anything.

It just means that I know the facts.

You can't have your own set of facts. :wink:
 

Mike

Well-known member
kolanuraven said:
Mike said:
kolanuraven said:
Thomas Friedman, author of From Beruit to Jersuleum, had a GREAT line that at once was shocking but now has a whole other aspect.

He was interviewing a security guard while he and the guard were stationed in Jersuleum. The guard was making reference to the people of the Gaza strip at the time.

" Sometimes you just have to shoot these people".

Ooooooooooo, that's very rich. The answer to all problems.

Especially with you being so Anti-Semitic. :roll:


I'll ask you also, find the VERY post where I said I was anti-Semitic.


Find it , hotshot.

Just one of many like this:
kolanuraven
Rancher
Rancher


Joined: 27 Jul 2005
Posts: 10766


PostPosted: Mon Jan 14, 2008 12:40 pm Post subject: Recipe for disaster.... Reply with quote


What a legacy this will be in the future for GW. I'm guessing a crater the size of Iraq and Iran together.




The US did a 20 BILLION+/- weapons deal with Saudi Arabia. The country from whence the majority of the people who flew the planes into the Twin Towers/Pentagon hail from. Say what? Say what? Say what?


The US did a 30 BILLION+/- deal with Israel. The country with a target " X" on it for any other Arab country in the world. Israel by itself is way way arrogant without any help from anyone else. They already got an itchy trigger finger as it is.....


So now we've loaded up both sides with jugs of gas...and we're also handing them the match!! Rolling Eyes Rolling Eyes Rolling Eyes


What a legacy this will be. Question is will anyone be left alive to record it?
 

Whitewing

Well-known member
hypocritexposer said:
Didn't Kola delete many of her posts...now she is challenging someone to find them?

I chuckle thinking of Reader the Second's meltdown. Had the mod delete ALL of her posts. :lol: AssHat Jr.
 

Latest posts

Top